RISE with SAP Negotiation Tactics — Article Series
- Complete Enterprise Guide
- Key Questions to Ask SAP
- → Negotiation Strategies (this article)
- Cost Optimisation Tactics for RISE Contracts
- 2026 Enterprise Guidance: RISE Negotiation Outlook
Key Takeaways
- RISE negotiation is a multi-round process — the enterprise that understands SAP's internal deal mechanics consistently outperforms the one that treats it as a standard procurement exercise
- Anchoring to market benchmarks rather than SAP's list price is the single highest-return strategy — enterprises that benchmark-anchor consistently achieve 45–55% discounts versus 30–40% for list-price negotiators
- Walk-away credibility is not about actually walking away — it is about building a position where SAP believes you genuinely might, which requires constructing real alternatives
- Timing leverage (SAP's fiscal year-end September 30) is a repeatable tactic that creates predictable deal-closing pressure every year
- Bringing independent RISE advisory into the negotiation signals commercial sophistication to SAP's team and consistently unlocks concessions that internal-only negotiations do not
RISE with SAP negotiation is not like buying enterprise software. It is more like negotiating a long-term infrastructure contract with a vendor that holds structural information advantages, has experienced negotiators on their side, and is under pressure from a board-level directive to migrate every ECC customer before 2027. Understanding those dynamics — and deploying strategies that account for them — is what separates the 20% discount from the 35% discount.
These eight strategies are drawn from our team's direct experience reviewing and negotiating over 60 RISE with SAP deals. They are sequenced in the order they should be deployed in a typical enterprise negotiation — from preparation through to final close. For the foundational context on RISE deal structure, start with our complete RISE negotiation tactics guide. Independent SAP licensing advisory — not affiliated with SAP SE.
Strategy 1: Build Your BATNA Before You Engage SAP Commercially
Construct a credible Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement
Your BATNA in a RISE negotiation is the alternative you pursue if the deal falls through or SAP refuses to meet your terms. The strength of your BATNA determines how much leverage you have throughout the negotiation. Without a credible BATNA, every concession you make is driven by the implicit reality that you need SAP more than they need you.
For RISE negotiations in 2025–2026, the most credible BATNA options are: continued ECC operation with third-party support (Rimini Street, Spinnaker) for 2–3 years while reassessing; Oracle ERP Cloud evaluation (even if not genuinely preferred, the evaluation process is real leverage); GROW with SAP as a lower-cost alternative for eligible SME divisions; or a phased migration strategy that defers the full RISE commitment by 12–18 months.
You do not need to prefer your BATNA. You need SAP to believe it is genuinely on the table. That requires documenting it: have a third-party support vendor provide a proposal, complete an Oracle evaluation, or commission an independent TCO comparison. SAP's account team will research your position. Make sure the research confirms your alternatives are real.
Strategy 2: Anchor to Market Benchmarks, Not SAP's List Price
Establish benchmark pricing before any commercial discussion
The most costly mistake in RISE negotiations is allowing SAP's list price to become the reference point for the entire negotiation. Enterprises that negotiate from list price — asking "can you improve the 15% discount?" — are playing on SAP's terms. Enterprises that enter with independent benchmark data — "comparable enterprises in our industry have achieved 45–50% discount on similar user mixes" — fundamentally alter the commercial framing.
Sourcing credible RISE benchmark data requires deliberate effort. Sources include: peer enterprise user groups (DSAG, ASUG, UK&I SAP User Group), informal peer polling (direct conversations with peers in comparable organisations who have recently signed RISE), and independent SAP advisory firms who maintain proprietary deal databases. The cost optimisation tactics article in this series covers the benchmarking methodology in detail.
Once you have benchmark data, deploy it in your first commercial response to SAP's proposal. State clearly that your market research indicates comparable enterprises are achieving X% discount on similar NLV deals, and that you will require SAP's proposal to align with market benchmarks before proceeding. This positions you as a sophisticated buyer with data — not a captive customer who will accept whatever SAP offers.
Strategy 3: Decompose the Bundle — Line by Line
Force itemised pricing across every RISE component
SAP's bundled RISE pricing is designed to prevent component-level comparison. When you receive a single RISE price, you cannot challenge the infrastructure cost independently of the software cost, or the BTP credit sizing independently of the Enterprise Support rate. Decomposition breaks this dynamic.
Request — insist, if necessary — that SAP provide itemised pricing for each RISE component: S/4HANA user licences (by type), infrastructure by hyperscaler, BTP credits (volume and unit price), Enterprise Support (expressed as percentage of NLV), Business Network access, and migration assistance. Each line item can then be challenged against market rates or your specific requirements. This process typically identifies 2–3 components where the initial proposal significantly exceeds market pricing.
The most common over-priced component we find in decomposition is BTP credits — routinely sized at 2–3× actual requirement. The second most common is infrastructure pricing, particularly when SAP has assumed a specific hyperscaler without conducting a competitive RFP. For the detailed questions to table during decomposition, see our guide on key questions to ask SAP during RISE negotiations.
Strategy 4: Run a Genuine Hyperscaler RFP
Create competition between Azure, AWS, and GCP for your RISE deployment
A hyperscaler RFP serves two purposes in RISE negotiation. First, it directly reduces infrastructure cost: hyperscaler competition consistently produces infrastructure savings of 12–18% versus SAP's initial infrastructure component pricing. Second, it creates deal-level leverage that affects all RISE components — SAP's commercial team is highly sensitive to hyperscaler preferences because the infrastructure margin affects SAP's own economics on the deal.
Running a genuine RFP requires engaging all three hyperscalers formally, providing them with your infrastructure requirements specification, and requesting pricing proposals with defined SLAs. The process takes 4–6 weeks. It is worth every week: the leverage it creates is disproportionate to the cost and effort. Communicate the RFP process to SAP's account team early — transparency about the evaluation creates competitive pressure before the proposals arrive.
A key tactic within the hyperscaler RFP: obtain Azure and AWS incentive funding commitments alongside the RISE infrastructure pricing. Both providers have enterprise incentive programmes that can be structured to offset RISE implementation costs. These incentives are separate from SAP's migration credits and can be deployed in parallel to maximise total deal value.
Strategy 5: Deploy Timing Leverage Systematically
Align your close to SAP's fiscal year-end pressure
SAP's fiscal year ends September 30. In Q3 (July–September), SAP's account teams are under maximum pressure to close pipeline deals. Deal-closing incentives align, discretionary budgets are deployed, and SAP's commercial architects have broader authority to offer concessions that would not be available in Q1 or Q2.
The strategy is straightforward: plan your RISE evaluation to reach final negotiation stage in July–August, with a target signature in September. Signal to SAP's account team in June that you are targeting a September close — this activates their quarter-end closing processes and positions your deal as priority pipeline. Then hold the timeline, resist signing earlier than planned, and make your final round of demands in late August when SAP's pressure is maximum.
This strategy requires disciplined timeline management. Enterprises that allow SAP to accelerate the timeline — signing in Q1 or Q2 to capture an "early bird" offer — almost always leave significant value on the table compared to enterprises that maintain Q3 discipline.
Strategy 6: Escalate to SAP's Commercial Architects
Bypass the account team and engage the commercial decision-makers
SAP's account team is the front line of the sales process, but they are not the commercial decision-makers. The account team has limited discretionary authority — they can offer standard concessions, but significant deals (typically >€5M TCV) require approval from SAP's commercial architects or regional deal desk. Escalating to that level — particularly when the account team signals that a request is "beyond their authority" — is a deliberate negotiation tactic, not an escalation of last resort.
Escalation is most effective when it is framed around specific, quantified requests. "We need a 5% reduction in the annual price escalator and an additional €500K in BTP credits" is more escalation-effective than "we need a better deal." Specific requests force SAP's deal desk to respond with specific counter-offers, which creates a documented negotiation record that can be used to track concession progress across proposal rounds.
Our SAP contract negotiation team manages escalation processes across multiple deal rounds, maintaining the documented concession record that enterprise procurement teams often fail to create when negotiating internally.
Strategy 7: Use Contract Terms as a Secondary Negotiation Currency
Trade contract flexibility against price concessions
RISE contract terms — exit provisions, user reassignment rights, SLA commitments, Digital Access scope, migration timeline flexibility — have real economic value. When SAP refuses to move further on price, deploying contract term requests as a secondary negotiation currency often unlocks value that pricing negotiations have exhausted. Conversely, offering to accept slightly less favourable terms in low-risk areas can unlock price concessions in the components that matter most.
The contract terms that have the highest commercial value for the enterprise (and therefore the highest leverage in negotiation) are: exit provisions with defined financial terms, user reassignment and reclassification rights, price escalator caps, and BTP credit rollover provisions. The terms that SAP values most — and will trade against — are contract length commitments, implementation timeline commitments, and reference/case study rights.
Structure these trades explicitly in your negotiation. "We are prepared to provide a reference case study and commit to a September 2025 go-live in exchange for a CPI-capped escalator and 18-month BTP credit rollover" is a more productive negotiation position than requesting all concessions simultaneously with nothing offered in return.
Strategy 8: Engage Independent RISE Advisory for the Final Round
Bring independent expertise to the closing phase
The final negotiation round is where the most value is either captured or lost. SAP's commercial team brings deal-closing pressure — timeline urgency, relationship-level appeals, and "final offer" positioning — that enterprise procurement teams are not equipped to counter without independent commercial data and experience.
Independent RISE with SAP advisory in the final round provides three things SAP's team cannot match: (1) real market benchmark data from comparable deals, (2) a documented concession history showing what SAP has offered and what the market rate implies they can still offer, and (3) commercial credibility that tells SAP's deal desk they are dealing with an informed buyer who will not be closed on unfavourable terms. The investment in independent advisory in the final round of a €10M+ RISE deal consistently generates positive ROI within the first year of the contract term.
Across 60+ RISE negotiations our team has participated in, the pattern is consistent: enterprises that deploy Strategies 1–3 (BATNA construction, benchmark anchoring, bundle decomposition) achieve an average of 22–28% savings versus SAP's initial proposal. Adding Strategies 4–5 (hyperscaler RFP and timing leverage) pushes that to 28–35%. The full eight-strategy approach — deployed in sequence — consistently achieves the 35%+ range on initial proposal savings, with additional contract term protections worth millions over the 5-year term.
The Negotiation Sequence: Putting It All Together
| Phase | Strategies Active | Key Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement (Months 1–2) | Strategy 1, 2 | BATNA documented; benchmark data sourced |
| First Proposal (Months 2–3) | Strategy 3, 4 | Bundle decomposed; hyperscaler RFP launched |
| Second Proposal (Months 3–4) | Strategy 5, 6 | Timing leverage activated; escalation to deal desk |
| Final Round (Month 5–6, targeting SAP Q3) | Strategy 7, 8 | Contract terms traded; independent advisory engaged |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISE with SAP Advisory
Deploy all eight strategies with independent expert support. We have the benchmark data, the deal experience, and the commercial precision your deal requires.
Get RISE Advisory Support →RISE Cost Optimisation Tactics
The detailed cost reduction methods behind these strategies — BTP right-sizing, user reclassification, and benchmarking methodology.
Read Cost Tactics →Ready to Negotiate Your RISE Deal?
Our team has negotiated RISE contracts worth over €500M combined. We know SAP's playbook because we helped write it. Now we use that knowledge exclusively for enterprise buyers.
Book a Free RISE Consultation