Key Takeaways
- The 6-step benchmarking process takes 4-6 weeks and requires gathering data from 3-4 sources (user groups, peer polling, independent advisors, public case studies)
- Establish your baseline: Calculate current effective discount rate (% off list), normalize to €/NLV, and compare against tier benchmarks
- Identify comparable companies: Match on revenue size, SAP NLV, industry vertical, and geography to create a valid peer group (10-15 minimum)
- Gather peer data through user groups (DSAG, ASUG), informal peer polling (confidential discussions with peers), and independent advisor reports (most reliable source)
- Model your target position: Set benchmark-based targets for license discount, support tier, and special terms; then deploy in negotiations with SAP
The 6-Step Benchmarking Process
Step 1: Establish Your Baseline Position (Week 1)
Before gathering peer data, know where you stand today. Calculate three metrics:
A. Current Effective Discount Rate (% off SAP list)
Formula:
- SAP list price for your license mix = sum of (license count × SAP list price per license)
- Your actual NLV = your current contract's Net License Value
- Discount = (SAP list - actual NLV) / SAP list × 100%
Example:
- Your license mix: 250 Named User Licenses (NUL) @ €40K/list = €10M list price
- Your contract NLV: €5.8M
- Discount: (€10M - €5.8M) / €10M = 42% discount
B. Normalized Cost (€/NLV)
SAP pricing is easiest to compare when normalized to a per-€1M-NLV basis:
- Annual support cost (€) / Total NLV (€M) = €K per €1M NLV
- Example: €22M support cost / €100M NLV = €220K per €1M = normalized rate is €22K/NLV
C. Support Tier (% of NLV)
Separately calculate your support cost as a percentage of NLV:
- Annual support fee / Total NLV = % of NLV
- Example: €22M / €100M = 22% of NLV (Enterprise Support standard rate)
Document these three metrics. You'll compare them against peer data.
I worked with a global manufacturing company that thought they had negotiated a "good deal" at 45% discount. When we normalized their position (€18M license NLV + €4.2M support = €22.2M total annual spend on €40M technical footprint), we discovered they were paying €22K per €1M NLV with support at 21% of NLV. Compared to peers (€20K/€1M, 21% support), they looked average. But their large NLV (€40M) meant they had massive negotiating leverage they weren't using. By positioning as a "Tier 4" customer and threatening RISE migration, they brought the rate down to €18.5K/€1M and support to 20%—saving €6.8M over their 3-year renewal term. The benchmark anchored the conversation at realistic market rates, not SAP's opening position.
Step 2: Identify Your Comparable Peer Profile (Week 1-2)
Create a peer profile to guide your benchmarking search:
| Profile Dimension | Why It Matters | Tolerance Range |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Size | Larger companies get bigger discounts due to negotiating leverage | ±30% of your revenue |
| SAP NLV | Primary driver of your tier and discount rate | ±25% of your NLV |
| Industry Vertical | Different verticals have different SAP leverage (manufacturing stronger than services) | Same or closely related |
| Geography | European vs Americas vs APAC pricing can vary slightly | Same region preferred; ±1 region acceptable |
| Complexity | Multi-instance, global, or single-instance affects support needs | Similar profile |
Example peer profile:
- Your company: €1.2B revenue, €75M SAP NLV, automotive manufacturing, multi-region EMEA/APAC, 4 instances
- Comparable profile: €900M-€1.5B revenue, €55M-€90M SAP NLV, automotive/mechanical engineering, similar multi-region footprint
Step 3: Gather Peer Benchmark Data from Multiple Sources (Week 2-4)
Use 3-4 data sources to triangulate real market pricing:
Source 1: User Groups (Free, Limited Value)
DSAG (German SAP Users)
- Access: Membership (€100-200/year) gives you access to annual pricing surveys
- Data age: 12-18 months old (published annually in Q2)
- Sample size: 200+ German enterprises
- Usefulness: Good for macro trends, industry verticals, rough tier benchmarks. Not precise for your specific profile.
ASUG (Americas SAP Users)
- Access: Membership ($150-300/year) for annual surveys
- Data age: 12+ months old
- Sample size: 300+ North American enterprises
- Usefulness: Useful for Americas benchmarks, broader cost-of-ownership trends (includes infrastructure, personnel). Less specific on pure licensing rates.
Source 2: Peer Polling (Confidential, High Value)
Directly contact 5-10 peer companies in your network and ask them to share their support tier % of NLV (anonymously if they prefer):
- Approach: "We're benchmarking our SAP renewal. Would you be comfortable sharing what % of NLV you pay for Enterprise Support? We'll keep it confidential."
- Expected response rate: 40-60% will share. Most executives are willing if you promise confidentiality.
- Usefulness: Current data, specific to your peer set, highest trust level. Limited sample size (5-10 companies), so triangulate with other sources.
Source 3: Independent Advisor Benchmark Report (Paid, Highest Value)
Commission a focused benchmark report from a SAP licensing advisor (€3-8K, 2-4 week turnaround):
- What you get: Aggregated, anonymized pricing data from 50-200 comparable enterprises, segmented by industry, size, and support tier
- Specificity: A report that says: "For a €75M enterprise in automotive manufacturing with 4 instances, the market median support cost is 21.2% of NLV and license discount is 48%"
- Defensibility: A third-party benchmark report carries weight in negotiations with SAP. It's much harder for SAP to argue with a professional advisor report than with your informal peer polling.
- Timeline: Requires 2-3 weeks for advisor to gather, analyze, and write the report
Source 4: Public Case Studies (Free, Low-Medium Value)
Search for published case studies and press releases from peers that disclose SAP contract terms:
- Search: "[Your industry] SAP contract announcement" or "[competitor] SAP renewal" in Google / LinkedIn
- Look for press releases where SAP or your peer announces a renewal. Often includes: "Multi-year Enterprise Support commitment," "Advanced support services," pricing per user, etc.
- Example: "Global logistics company renews SAP ECC+HANA, $50M+ multi-year commitment with Enterprise Support" tells you roughly their scale and support choice
- Usefulness: Directional. Not precise pricing, but confirms market direction.
Step 4: Build Your Benchmarking Worksheet (Week 3-4)
Aggregate all data into a worksheet to identify patterns:
| Peer Company | Revenue | SAP NLV (Est.) | Support % NLV | €/NLV | License Discount % | Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your Company (Today) | €1.2B | €75M | 22% | €22K | 42% | Current contract |
| Peer A (Mfg) | €950M | €68M | 21% | €21K | 48% | Advisor report |
| Peer B (Mfg) | €1.35B | €82M | 21.5% | €21.5K | 46% | Informal peer |
| Peer C (Mfg) | €1.1B | €71M | 22% | €22K | 44% | DSAG survey |
| PEER MEDIAN: | ||||||
| – | €1.1B | €72.5M | 21.25% | €21.25K | 46% | – |
What the worksheet tells you:
- Your current support cost (22% of NLV) is 0.75% above peer median (21.25%). At €75M NLV, that's a €562.5K annual opportunity if you can negotiate down.
- Your license discount (42%) is 4% below peer median (46%). That's a € 3M opportunity on your next license tranche.
- Combined: €3.5M+ negotiation opportunity in a 3-year renewal.
Step 5: Model Your Target Position (Week 4)
Based on your benchmark data, define what "good" looks like:
Target A: Support Tier (Conservative)
- Peer median: 21.25% Enterprise Support
- Your target: 21% (match median, demonstrate leverage)
- Savings: (22% - 21%) × €75M = €750K annual
Target B: Support Tier (Aggressive)
- Top-tier companies (Tier 4): 20-20.5% Enterprise Support
- Your stretch target: 20.5% (position yourself as top-tier)
- Savings: (22% - 20.5%) × €75M = €1.125M annual
Target C: License Discount
- Peer median: 46% discount
- Your target: 46% (match median for new licenses)
- Current: 42%, so gap to close: 4% on future license purchases
Target D: Special Terms
- Carryover MaxAttention credits 3-year period (industry standard)
- Lock named engineer continuity for contract term
- Quarterly business reviews (Enterprise Support standard)
Document these targets clearly. You'll present them to SAP in negotiation.
Step 6: Deploy Benchmarks in Negotiation (Week 5-6)
When SAP presents their renewal proposal, deploy your benchmark analysis:
Opening Position (Week 5)
Present SAP with a professional position paper:
"We've completed a comprehensive benchmark of our SAP renewal position against peer enterprises comparable in size, industry, and complexity. The results show a 1-2% opportunity to align our support costs with market rates. Specifically: Current Position: 22% of NLV Enterprise Support Peer Median: 21.25% of NLV Enterprise Support Requested Position: 21% of NLV Enterprise Support We've attached an anonymized benchmark summary (from [Advisor/DSAG/Peer Group]) supporting these rates. We request alignment to market pricing effective Year 1 of our renewal."
SAP Response & Counter (Week 5-6)
SAP will respond with one of three positions:
Response 1: Accept Benchmark ("You're right, we'll match 21%")
- Outcome: You win on support pricing. Lock it into the contract for full term.
Response 2: Acknowledge but Hold ("Benchmark is interesting, but your complexity justifies 22%")
- Counter: "Our peers have similar complexity (4 instances, multi-region, 2000+ users). Show us examples of customers at our tier paying 22%+ and we'll reconsider."
- Escalation: Request meeting with SAP customer success executive, not just sales. Executives are more flexible on benchmarking data.
Response 3: Refuse Benchmark ("List price is our standard; discounts are case-by-case")
- Counter: Present a second benchmark source (advisor + peer data). "Multiple sources confirm 21% is market. We're requesting market alignment."
- Leverage: "If we can't align on support pricing, we'll need to explore RISE with SAP for non-core systems or evaluate alternatives. What can we do to make this work?"
- Fallback: Accept 21.25% (between current and target), save €375K annually, move on to next negotiation item (license discount, special terms).
Benchmarking Worksheet Template (Use This)
Download or recreate this worksheet to track your benchmarking process:
| Benchmark Dimension | Your Current Position | Peer Median / Benchmark | Your Target | Gap (Opportunity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| License Discount % off List | 42% | 46% | 46% | 4% (€3M on next tranche) |
| Enterprise Support % NLV | 22% | 21.25% | 21% | 1% (€750K annual) |
| MaxAttention Credit Carryover | 1-year (resets) | 3-year standard | 3-year carryover | €500-750K value |
| Named Engineer Continuity | 1-2 years (rotation) | 3+ years committed | 3-year lockdown | Relationship stability |
| TOTAL 3-YEAR RENEWAL OPPORTUNITY: €6-8M | ||||
Common Benchmarking Mistakes to Avoid
- Using old data: User group data is 12-18 months old. Supplement with recent peer polling or advisor reports for current rates.
- Comparing non-peers: Don't benchmark a €20M enterprise against €100M companies. Tiers matter. Use like-sized peers only.
- Forgetting support tier: License discount alone doesn't tell the story. Support cost (% of NLV) is often where the leverage lies.
- Presenting benchmark without attribution: Say "Our benchmark report shows..." or "Peer consensus is..." Don't say "We think..." SAP dismisses opinion; they respect data.
- Being too aggressive: Don't ask for top-tier pricing if you're Tier 2. Set realistic targets based on your actual peer group, not aspirational ones.
Timeline: 4-6 Weeks Start to Finish
- Week 1: Calculate baseline, identify peer profile
- Week 2: Contact peers, start advisor RFP
- Week 3: Gather user group data, receive advisor report
- Week 4: Build worksheet, model targets
- Week 5-6: Present to SAP, negotiate, reach agreement
Plan benchmarking to complete 2-4 weeks before your SAP renewal negotiation. This gives you time to gather data and build confidence before engaging SAP's sales team.
Related Articles
For broader context on SAP benchmarking and negotiation strategy, see our pillar guide and the BoM management series:
- SAP Price Benchmarking: The Complete Enterprise Guide for 2026
- SAP BoM Review: The Complete Enterprise Guide for 2026
- SAP BoM vs What You Actually Use: The Licence Gap Analysis
- Building Your Own SAP BoM Counter-Proposal
- SAP Licence Cost Reduction Strategies: Maximise Your Benchmarking Results
- SAP License Optimisation Overview: The Complete Enterprise Guide for 2026