Locations

Resources

Careers

Contact

Contact us

SAP negotiations

Using Benchmark Data to Strengthen SAP Negotiations

Benchmark Data to Strengthen SAP Negotiations

Using Benchmark Data to Strengthen Your SAP Negotiations: Why It Matters

Negotiating an SAP contract without market context is like flying blind – it often leads to inflated pricing and missed savings opportunities. Many enterprises enter into SAP license and support negotiations, relying solely on SAP’s quotes and sales promises. The result?

They might accept prices or discounts that seem reasonable in isolation but are significantly higher than what others pay for similar deals. This is where SAP benchmark data for negotiations becomes critical.

By understanding what peer companies typically pay and the types of discounts the market offers, your sourcing team can approach SAP deals with confidence and informed facts. SAP’s sales teams are skilled at structuring deals that maximize revenue, often negotiating longer terms with enticing discounts. For an in‑depth overview of SAP negotiation topics, read our Ultimate Guide to SAP Contract Negotiations.

This guide, written from the perspective of an SAP licensing and negotiation expert, will show you how to harness SAP pricing benchmark data to get better outcomes.

We’ll explore why benchmarking matters, how to gather pricing intelligence from peers, internal data, and advisors, and how to apply these insights to validate or challenge SAP’s proposals.

With the right benchmarks in hand, you can push harder for savings where there’s room and recognize when an offer on the table is truly competitive. Let’s dive in.

Learn about SAP Bundling Negotiation

Why Benchmarking Matters in SAP Negotiations

The cost of negotiating without context:

When you negotiate without any benchmarks, SAP holds all the cards. SAP’s pricing is famously opaque – list prices are sky-high and almost no one pays full list price.

If you don’t know the “going rate” in the market, you risk accepting a mediocre deal, thinking it’s a good one.

For example, a 25% discount might sound generous until you learn that similar enterprises routinely secure 50% or more. Negotiating without benchmark intelligence often means leaving substantial money on the table.

Leverage and credibility through data:

Incorporating peer SAP pricing comparisons and industry benchmarks into your strategy instantly boosts your credibility.

When SAP’s sales team realizes you’ve done your homework, the dynamic changes. Instead of relying on their claims (“this is the best price you’ll get this year” or “no other customer gets a bigger discount”), you can counter with facts. By citing data (in a professional, non-confrontational way) about typical industry SAP discount benchmarks, you shift the conversation.

SAP reps understand they can’t rely on your ignorance; they know you’ll recognize a bad deal. This vendor-skeptical stance, backed by hard numbers, gives you negotiation leverage to demand pricing and terms in line with what other savvy customers receive.

Avoiding overpaying and missed opportunities:

Benchmark data is essentially a reality check. It answers the critical question: “Are we getting a competitive deal?” Without it, companies sometimes overpay by millions over the life of a contract or accept terms that others have successfully negotiated away.

With benchmarks, you reduce risk – you won’t be easily tricked by the classic line that “you’re getting a special one-time offer.” Instead, you can validate whether an SAP proposal is truly aggressive or just average.

In high-value SAP negotiations, having these data insights means you can negotiate from a position of strength, rather than uncertainty.

Multi-Year SAP Contracts

How to Gather SAP Benchmark Data

Obtaining high-quality SAP pricing benchmark data requires tapping into multiple sources.

Here are three key avenues to build your intelligence:

  • Peer discussions and networking: One of the most effective ways to benchmark is through your network. Engage with sourcing peers at other companies, especially those in your industry or with similar IT spending. Without breaching any confidentiality, many will share ballpark figures or ranges. For instance, in an informal chat at a user group meeting or an industry conference, you might learn that a peer negotiated a 55% discount on a similar SAP software package. These peer SAP pricing comparisons provide a reality check for your deal. Professional networking forums, SAP user groups, and industry associations are great places to start these conversations.
  • Internal deal history: Don’t overlook your own organization’s data. Your procurement or IT finance team likely has records of past SAP deals, including initial quotes and final negotiated discounts. Analyze your internal history: what discount percentage did you achieve in your last big SAP purchase or renewal? That sets a baseline. Also, look at contracts from different business units or regions within your enterprise – there may be untapped knowledge if another division negotiated a strong deal. By maintaining an internal repository of SAP pricing outcomes (licenses and maintenance costs), you build a private benchmark library. This internal intelligence is gold for validating new proposals against what your company has seen before.
  • Independent advisors and market research: To get broader market SAP negotiation data insights, consider engaging independent licensing advisors or accessing research from firms that specialize in enterprise software pricing. Advisory firms (for example, those akin to Gartner or specialized SAP negotiation consultancies) aggregate anonymized data on many SAP deals. They might provide reports, such as “average discount for S/4HANA deals over $5M” or typical per-user price ranges for cloud subscriptions. This external perspective can fill in gaps, especially if you don’t have enough peer info. Yes, it may involve some cost or consulting fees, but for a high-stakes SAP negotiation, the ROI can be huge. Advisors can quickly tell you if SAP’s proposal is above market rates and where to push. In short, leverage any credible source of enterprise SAP cost benchmarks you can find – the more data points, the clearer the picture of what’s achievable.

Applying Benchmark Data in Negotiations

Collecting benchmarks is only half the battle – you need to use that data strategically to influence the negotiation.

Here’s how to put your intel to work:

Establish fair ranges and targets:

Before negotiations begin, define your target price or discount range based on the benchmarks. For example, if your research indicates that SAP discount percentage benchmarks for a deal of your size are typically around 50–60% off the list price, set your initial ask accordingly.

Having a data-backed goal focuses your strategy and strengthens your position. It also helps you justify your stance to internal stakeholders (e.g., “We’re aiming for a 55% discount because that’s what similar companies achieved.”). These benchmarks act as your compass, ensuring your goals are grounded in reality.

Validate or challenge proposals:

As the negotiation unfolds, compare every SAP proposal against your benchmark data – effectively using it as a guide for SAP pricing comparisons to gauge competitiveness. This is how you validate whether an SAP offer is truly market-competitive.

If SAP’s “best offer” is a 30% discount, but your data indicates that 50% is common, you know their offer isn’t good enough. You can then push back: “We’ve done our market homework – enterprises of our profile are getting much deeper discounts. We need to see a better number.”

Conversely, if SAP comes in with a proposal that’s in line with or better than the benchmark, you’ll recognize it as a strong offer and can consider closing confidently. Benchmarks prevent second-guessing: you’ll know when to keep negotiating and when you’ve likely hit a fair deal.

Countering the “best and final” bluff:

Vendors often claim an offer is “best and final” to pressure you into signing. Benchmark data gives you a shield against this tactic. If their so-called best-and-final doesn’t measure up to the market standards you’ve collected, you can calmly respond that it’s not best-in-market.

Share a data point or two (without naming sources) to show you’re informed. For example: “Our analysis shows this type of deal usually lands around a mid-double-digit discount in the market.”

This signals to SAP that they can’t expect you to accept an inflated price. Often, merely demonstrating that you have SAP contract negotiation data at your disposal will make the vendor reconsider and improve the offer to avoid losing your business.

Know when to walk or agree:

Perhaps most importantly, benchmarks inform your walk-away point. If SAP absolutely won’t match the market and is offering above-average pricing, you might decide to pause negotiations, escalate to higher management, or even explore alternative solutions.

On the flip side, if your benchmarks tell you SAP’s offer is genuinely competitive (say you were targeting 50% off and they offered 55% plus some favorable terms), you can feel confident about accepting and locking it in.

Using data in this way removes much of the guesswork and emotion from the process. It turns negotiation into a fact-based discussion rather than a game of who blinks first.

Typical SAP Discount Ranges and Pricing Patterns

What does a “good deal” look like in concrete numbers? While every situation is different, there are common patterns in SAP pricing and discounting:

  • Large license deals (on-premise software): For big-ticket license purchases (think multi-million dollar deals, such as a global S/4HANA implementation), enterprises often secure discounts in the range of 50% or more off SAP’s list prices. In highly competitive situations or end-of-quarter negotiations, discounts of 60–70% are not unusual. SAP will sometimes go that far if they’re trying to win a strategic customer or beat a rival. These hefty cuts reflect the reality that SAP’s list prices are just starting points – they expect savvy customers to negotiate aggressively.
  • Midsize and smaller deals: For smaller contracts or incremental purchases (such as a few hundred thousand dollars’ worth of licenses), the discount percentages may be lower. It’s common to see 20–40% off the list price in these cases, depending on how much SAP is willing to offer and how effectively you negotiate. Don’t be shy about aiming highe,r even if your spending is modest. If you have leverage (like evaluating a competing platform or bundling multiple SAP products together), you could still push beyond the “standard” range. The key is to know what similar-sized clients have achieved and use that as your benchmark.
  • Cloud subscriptions: SAP’s cloud products (SuccessFactors, Ariba, S/4HANA Cloud, etc.) often display a discount that appears to be smaller (typically 15–30% off the publicly listed subscription price). Don’t be fooled by the lower percentage; sometimes the cloud “list price” is less transparent. There is room to negotiate in cloud deals as well. It’s common to negotiate terms such as extra months of service at no additional charge, caps on future price increases, or bundling additional users or modules at a reduced rate. When you factor in these perks, the effective savings can be as significant as an upfront license discount. In short, understanding how to benchmark SAP pricing for cloud deals involves examining the effective cost per user or unit of consumption and comparing it across companies, as the raw discount percentage alone may not tell the full story.
  • Maintenance and support fees: SAP’s standard annual support fee is typically 20–22% of your net license cost. A key benchmark here is that most customers pay roughly that percentage – direct discounts on support fees are uncommon. However, what you can benchmark and negotiate are the terms around maintenance. For instance, savvy customers often insist on maintenance fee caps (e.g., support costs can’t increase by more than 3% per year, or are fixed with no increase for the first two years). Recently, SAP even tied support hikes to inflation in some regions (up to 5%), so having a cap is crucial. If peers in your industry have secured, say, a 2% cap on annual support increases, use that SAP pricing comparison insight to justify a similar request. Also, always ensure that your maintenance is calculated on the discounted license price (it usually is, but it’s worth double-checking your contract language). The goal is to keep long-term support costs in line with those of our competitors and avoid unexpected expenses in the future.
  • Bundling and volume trends: SAP often encourages larger deals by bundling products or offering tiered volume discounts. For example, they might say, “If you also purchase our analytics and database solutions now, we’ll give you a better discount across the board.” Bundles can yield great savings, but be cautious: only bundle products you genuinely need; otherwise, you end up with shelfware (unused licenses that still require maintenance payments). Volume-based discounting is standard – the more users or modules you buy, the lower the per-unit cost. If your planned purchase is near a volume threshold, ask about the next tier. Sometimes, increasing your quantity slightly (such as buying 10% more licenses) can bump you into a higher discount bracket, thereby lowering your overall cost. Understanding these patterns and typical terms in the market means you can spot if SAP’s offer aligns with normal practice. If something seems off (such as a significantly lower discount than expected for a large volume or an unusually high uplift on a bundle), you’ll know to question it.

Remember, these ranges are guidelines, not guarantees. Industry SAP discount benchmarks can vary by sector and region (public sector deals, for instance, may have different dynamics than private sector ones).

But knowing these patterns helps you recognize if an offer is in the right ballpark.

Suppose your deal’s discount is far outside typical ranges (i.e., significantly lower than what others report). In that case, that’s a clear signal to press for more or seek justification for why your situation would be different.

Mini-Scenario: Benchmark-Driven Win

Consider a real-world example of how benchmark intelligence can change the outcome of an SAP negotiation.

A global manufacturing company was renewing a major SAP contract and adding licenses for a new SAP module. SAP’s initial proposal offered a 25% discount off the list price for the new licenses and standard support terms (22% annual maintenance).

The vendor insisted that this was a fair deal for a renewal, even claiming, “Most customers our size pay around that.”

The sourcing team was skeptical. They gathered data points from an independent advisor and their industry peers. The benchmark data showed that enterprises of similar size were securing about a 50% discount on equivalent SAP licenses – double what SAP had offered.

Some peers had even negotiated a clause to cap maintenance increases at 3% per year. Armed with this information, the team went back to SAP for another round of talks. Without revealing confidential info, they made it clear they knew the market: “We have insight into typical pricing for this kind of deal, and your offer isn’t aligning with what we’d consider competitive. We’re looking for something closer to that 50% discount range, and more favorable support terms, to get this done.”

Faced with a customer who had done their homework, SAP reconsidered its position.

After some intense negotiation (timed near SAP’s quarter-end for maximum leverage), the final agreement was 52% off the license list price – more than double the initial discount.

Moreover, the company secured a maintenance fee cap of 2.5% annually for the next three years. This benchmark-driven negotiation saved the company millions in upfront costs and locked in future savings on support.

The key takeaway: without benchmark data, that team might have accepted 25% off with no cap, resulting in significant overpayment. By leveraging data, they turned an average offer into a stellar deal.

Six Strategic Recommendations

To embed benchmarking into your SAP negotiation approach, keep these six strategies in mind:

  1. Start every negotiation with benchmark intelligence: Begin your planning by researching and compiling relevant pricing benchmarks. Never enter a high-value SAP negotiation without having some data points on typical market rates and discount levels. Preparation is power – a few hours of gathering intel can save millions later.
  2. Compare both license and maintenance pricing: Don’t focus only on the upfront license or subscription cost. Also, check benchmarks for ongoing maintenance or cloud renewal fees. A great one-time license discount means little if the support costs spike and erode those savings. Always evaluate the total deal economics (including license and maintenance) against benchmarks, so you optimize the full lifetime cost, not just the Initial price.
  3. Share select data points to build credibility, not confrontation: Let SAP know you’re informed, but do it tactfully. You might say, “We’ve analyzed current market pricing for similar SAP environments,” as a gentle signal. You don’t need to divulge specifics or sound adversarial – the goal is to show you have a basis for your expectations. This approach builds respect. The vendor will realize you can’t be easily convinced with sales spin, and that sets a professional tone for a fact-based negotiation.
  4. Maintain an internal benchmark library for future deals: Treat each negotiation as an opportunity to gather intel. Document the discounts, pricing, and key terms you achieved, and note any insights into SAP’s flexibility or tactics. Over time, this internal repository of deal data becomes a powerful asset. It ensures knowledge isn’t lost when team members change and lets you start each new negotiation with a strong baseline. Essentially, you’re creating your own tailored SAP contract negotiation data reference that grows richer with every deal.
  5. Use benchmark “deltas” to focus negotiation efforts: Identify where SAP’s proposal diverges most from your benchmarks – those gaps highlight where you have the most to gain. If your data shows, for example, that the proposed price for SAP database licenses is 40% above typical market rates, zero in on that in negotiations. By concentrating on the largest discrepancies, you maximize the impact of your efforts. Benchmarks help you triage: rather than haggling equally over every line item, you direct energy where it counts, potentially yielding significant savings on the priciest components.
  6. Revalidate benchmarks before every major renewal or expansion: The software market isn’t static. What was a great deal five years ago might be just average today (or vice versa) due to changes in SAP pricing strategy, new competitors, or shifts in IT spending trends. Before you head into any big negotiation – whether it’s a renewal, a migration (like moving to SAP S/4HANA or RISE), or a large expansion – refresh your intelligence. Tap your peer network again, obtain an updated perspective from industry analysts or advisors, and review the latest published data if available. Ensuring your benchmarks are current means you won’t negotiate based on outdated assumptions. It keeps your approach sharp and aligned with the present day, which is exactly where SAP’s sales team will be focused.

Governance & Ongoing Benchmark Management

Finally, to consistently use benchmark data to strengthen your SAP negotiations, you need to make it part of your organization’s DNA.

That means establishing governance around how you collect and use this information:

  • Assign ownership: Designate a team or individual (e.g., a procurement excellence lead or a vendor management office) to oversee the process of gathering and updating SAP benchmark data. When someone is responsible, it’s far more likely you’ll have fresh data when you need it. This owner can coordinate networking efforts, manage relationships with external advisors, and compile internal deal stats in one place. The result is that benchmark knowledge becomes institutional, not ad hoc.
  • Refresh your intelligence regularly: Make benchmark gathering an ongoing effort, not a one-time project. Markets change – SAP may adjust list prices or licensing models, new competitors can emerge, or economic conditions (such as inflation or currency fluctuations) can affect the attainable discounts. Set a routine to update your benchmarks (say, an annual refresh or a post-mortem after every major SAP negotiation). And refresh the data before any significant new negotiation. Regular updates ensure that your SAP pricing benchmark data remains accurate and actionable, allowing you to negotiate based on current market realities.
  • Incorporate benchmarks into the negotiation playbook: If your procurement department has a negotiation playbook or standard process, bake benchmarks into it. For example, include a step in your preparation checklist: “Gather relevant SAP pricing benchmarks and define target discount ranges.” Train your team on why and how to use this data. Over time, using benchmark intelligence should become as standard as performing an internal spend analysis or reviewing contract Terms and Conditions. By institutionalizing the practice, you remove variability – every negotiation will start with a data-driven foundation, regardless of who leads it.

By treating benchmark intelligence as a strategic asset – collecting it, curating it, and deploying it every time – you dramatically improve your chances of securing competitive, value-rich SAP agreements. Instead of reacting to SAP’s numbers, you’ll proactively steer the conversation with informed expectations.

In high-value SAP deals, that’s the edge every enterprise needs. In short, negotiating SAP using benchmarks turns the tables in your favor and ensures you never go into a deal unprepared.

Read about our SAP Contract Negotiation Service.

SAP Negotiations Explained – ECC, S 4HANA, RISE with SAP, Support & Third Party Options

Do you want to know more about our SAP Negotiation Services?

Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is a seasoned IT leader and recognized expert in enterprise software licensing and negotiation. With over 15 years of experience in SAP licensing, he has held senior roles at IBM, Oracle, and SAP. Fredrik brings deep expertise in optimizing complex licensing agreements, cost reduction, and vendor negotiations for global enterprises navigating digital transformation.

    View all posts