Locations

Resources

Careers

Contact

Contact us

SAP Cloud Licensing

SAP Sovereign Cloud – What It Means, Licensing & Contracts, Workload Eligibility, and Technical FAQs (2025)

SAP Sovereign Cloud

SAP Sovereign Cloud

SAP Sovereign Cloud is not just about where your SAP data lives – it’s a whole approach to cloud computing under strict data residency and regulatory requirements.

In business terms, it means adopting SAP’s cloud solutions (such as S/4HANA and BTP) with guaranteed local control over data, operations, and support.

This model is designed for organizations in the public sector, defense, critical infrastructure, and other highly regulated industries that can’t accept the typical “global” cloud model.

In 2025, amid tightening privacy laws and Schrems II-style data transfer risks, many enterprises are seeking cloud options from SAP that keep data and operations within specific borders.

Why the fuss now? Because regulations and risks have escalated.

European authorities are demanding that personal and sensitive data stay within the EU (in fact, even hyperscalers like Microsoft have introduced an “EU data boundary” to avoid exporting support data). Sector-specific laws in healthcare, finance, and government require proof that foreign entities can’t freely access your systems.

And the rise of AI processing means companies worry about where training data or telemetry might go.

In this context, SAP’s Sovereign Cloud offerings promise compliance assurances: data stays local, only cleared local staff manage the systems, your encryption keys remain under your control, and all support and monitoring happen in-region.

At a high level, choosing a sovereign cloud model has big implications for licensing, contracts, and total cost. This isn’t a one-click technical setting – it’s a fundamental decision about how you’ll buy and use SAP over the next 3–5 years.

The commitments are usually long-term (multi-year contracts) and come with premium costs and stricter terms.

In return, you aim to mitigate risks such as regulatory fines, data exposure, or supply chain vulnerabilities.

Frame this as a strategic investment in risk reduction: you’re trading some flexibility and budget for greater control and compliance peace of mind.

What “Sovereign” Actually Means (Cut Through Marketing)

Let’s demystify “sovereign” from a practical standpoint.

Cloud sovereignty isn’t just having a data center in your country – it’s a stack of controls and guarantees across several dimensions:

  • Data location and residency: Your data (and its backups) are stored only in-country or within an approved jurisdiction. No surprise replicas in another region. This addresses data residency laws and prevents unwarranted cross-border transfers.
  • Operator access controls: The systems are run and maintained by locally vetted personnel. SAP (and its subcontractors) restricts admin access to citizens or residents of the defined region, often with security clearance. No foreign admins should have the keys to your kingdom.
  • Encryption and key ownership: Sovereign setups often provide the option for customer-managed encryption keys or, at the very least, dedicated in-region HSMs (Hardware Security Modules). This ensures that even if someone had access, they couldn’t read data without your key. You hold the ultimate lock and key, literally.
  • Legal jurisdiction and governance: The cloud contracts and operations are anchored under local legal entities. That means if a foreign government or court orders access to data, SAP can lawfully refuse based on local law. The cloud infrastructure is structured to mitigate foreign control or influence (for example, SAP’s EU sovereign cloud is run by an EU entity or a trusted partner, guarding against U.S. CLOUD Act reach).
  • Operational autonomy: The cloud environment can run independently of SAP’s global infrastructure. Control planes (management systems) are either local or at least isolated. Monitoring, support tickets, and telemetry data are kept within the boundary or handled only by in-region tools. In a true sovereign model, if the global SAP network had an outage or intrusion, your environment would be insulated.

SAP uses terms like “sovereign-ready” or “sovereign capabilities” in marketing.

Be cautious: “sovereign-ready” is not the same as contractually sovereign. It might mean the infrastructure could support sovereignty if configured and governed correctly, but until it’s explicitly in your contract, it’s just a nice promise.

For example, a hyperscaler might offer a sovereign cloud region (a special data center for government clients), but SAP could also deploy in a standard region with some added controls.

The difference must be clear: Is your system in a segregated government cloud environment, or is it just a normal cloud region with additional policies applied? Both approaches exist, and each has its trade-offs in terms of cost and service availability.

Watch out for red flags in vendor claims.

Phrases like “we will make best efforts to keep data in the region” or references to non-binding policy documents should raise eyebrows. A truly sovereign cloud deal will have hard commitments: e.g., data shall remain in Country X; admin access shall be restricted to nationals of Y; if SAP must deviate for support, it requires customer approval.

If you see carve-outs like “except for telemetry” or “except for disaster recovery copies,” dig deeper – those could be loopholes allowing data to flow out or foreign personnel to peek in. Sovereignty has to be all-or-nothing: a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

If 95% of operations are local but, say, nightly logs still get sent to a U.S. system for monitoring, you’ve broken the model.

Do: Insist on clear, written guarantees for data location, local personnel access, and in-jurisdiction operations – with remedies if breached.
Don’t: Rely on marketing brochures or vague “sovereign-ready” labels without binding contract terms to back them up.

Licensing & Contract Constructs You Must Nail

Adopting SAP Sovereign Cloud isn’t just a technical shift – it’s a licensing and contracting game with its own rules.

SAP has introduced specific commercial models and contract riders for sovereign cloud customers. Here’s what to pay attention to:

  • RISE with SAP – Sovereign Edition: If you’re moving to S/4HANA Cloud via RISE, be aware that there may be a special “sovereign cloud” version of the offering. RISE is SAP’s all-in-one subscription (bundling S/4HANA, infrastructure, and services), and in sovereign deals, it typically means a Private Cloud, single-tenant edition hosted under sovereign conditions. This could be branded as SAP Private Sovereign Cloud. It usually carries a price premium and possibly a separate order form or annex outlining sovereignty measures. Make sure you understand if your RISE contract explicitly states the sovereign controls (data center location, etc.) – it should, if it’s truly the sovereign edition.
  • SAP BTP Sovereign Tenants: For the SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) services (like integration, analytics, database services), SAP provides sovereign cloud regions where only approved services run. The licensing may be based on a consumption model or subscriptions, but the catch is that the service catalog is limited. Ensure that any BTP services you plan to use are actually available in the sovereign region. (For example, some AI or IoT services might not yet be offered in the German sovereign cloud, or not at parity with global cloud.) The contract should list which BTP region your account will reside in and any restrictions. Licensing BTP in a sovereign environment might also mean separate SKUs or pricing, so confirm if there’s a “Sovereign BTP” rate card.
  • Perpetual vs Subscription and BYOL: Some customers have existing perpetual licenses (with annual maintenance) for SAP software. A common question is: Can you bring your own license (BYOL) into a sovereign cloud environment? The answer varies by product. Suppose you intend to run, say, a Business Suite or S/4HANA instance in a sovereign IaaS of your own (like in a government cloud region on Azure or AWS). In that case, you might technically be able to use your on-prem licenses, but SAP may require that you convert them to a cloud subscription model for managed sovereign cloud services. Typically, RISE does not allow BYOL for core S/4HANA – you convert your contract to subscription. However, for some add-ons or platform components, SAP might allow BYOL if you manage the environment yourself. Clarify eligibility in writing: which licenses can be ported or converted, and on what metrics (e.g., converting CPU-based licenses to a cloud memory metric, or named users on-prem to user subscriptions cloud). This is a chance to also clean up “shelfware” – unused licenses – by negotiating credit for them during the migration.
  • Contract “layer cake”: Expect multiple documents. A master cloud agreement (or your enterprise agreement) will set general terms. Then you’ll have order forms for the specific services (S/4HANA, BTP, etc.,) possibly indicating “Sovereign Cloud” editions. A Data Processing Agreement (DPA) will be crucial – it should reflect the data residency and handling rules (no subprocessor outside the region without consent, etc.). Sovereignty annexes or schedules likely outline the specific controls (much of what we discussed, such as staff nationality and encryption). There may also be a security policy or schedule that defines technical measures. If a hyperscaler is involved (e.g., SAP is using AWS GovCloud under the hood), ensure the relevant flow-down terms from that provider are included or referenced so that you have transparency. All these need to be consistent – for instance, if the DPA says data might leave for support, that conflicts with a strict sovereignty annex.
  • Pricing and premiums: Sovereign cloud often comes at a premium price. This can be an added percentage uplift on standard cloud pricing or simply a smaller discount given. Why? Running a segregated environment with local personnel is more costly for SAP. They might also have fewer customers in those regions, so fewer economies of scale. As a customer, you should negotiate caps on these uplifts. For example, if SAP says “Sovereign edition is 20% more expensive,” see if they can justify it or reduce it with scale. Find leverage: consider bundling more volume (additional users or systems) to secure a better tier discount that offsets the uplift. Also, look at migration incentives – SAP really wants its customers (even regulated ones) on the cloud, so ask for credits or discounts in the early years. They might offer a first-year discount or professional services help if you sign a longer term.
  • Term length and flexibility: Most SAP cloud contracts are 3 to 5 years. Sovereign deals might lean toward the longer side (5 years) due to the investment involved. However, try to build in flexibility. For instance, a 5-year term could include a 3-year firm term + 2-year extension option (giving you an out or renegotiation point at year 3). Also consider ramp-up structures: if you won’t fully migrate all workloads on day 1, don’t pay full price from day 1. Negotiate a phased rollout (e.g., 50% of users for the first 12 months, then 80%, then 100% by year 3 as you expand). Additionally, secure any rights to adjust capacity. In a perfect world, you’d want some step-down rights (maybe you can reduce users by up to 10% at a renewal or anniversary if your needs drop, instead of being stuck over-provisioned). At a minimum, ensure you have clear true-up/true-down mechanisms: if you exceed licensed counts, what’s the process to true-up, and is there a grace period? And if you’re under, can you apply that to other services or get some credit? While true-down refunds are rare, you might negotiate the ability to reallocate unused subscription value to other SAP products (or at least prevent paying penalties for not meeting a forecast).
  • Audits and compliance obligations: Even in the cloud, SAP can audit your usage and compliance. In a sovereign cloud contract, define how audits will work. Will SAP have the right to pull logs to verify users or integrations? They shouldn’t do this from outside the boundary without permission. You may want the contract to stipulate that any audit of your usage data must also comply with sovereignty rules (i.e., audit data remains local or is reviewed on-site). Also, clarify audit windows and remedies: e.g., if an audit finds you’re 10% over on users, do you have 30 days to purchase more to cure it, or will they back-charge you list price? Push for a reasonable rectification period with pre-agreed pricing (and perhaps waive any “list price penalty” if you promptly true-up). Given the compliance sensitivity, also ensure operational audits; you may require SAP to provide evidence of their compliance (discussed later under artifacts and attestations).
  • Indirect access and licensing traps: Indirect/digital access is the classic gotcha where third-party systems or non-SAP applications accessing SAP data can incur license fees. In a sovereign environment, you will likely integrate local systems (like national systems, local analytics tools) with SAP. It’s critical to pre-approve these integration patterns with SAP in the contract. Document what interfaces and data flows are expected (e.g., using an API gateway, or exporting certain data to a data warehouse) and get SAP’s agreement that these won’t trigger additional license fees. If you cannot pin this down, you risk SAP later claiming that, say, your government portal that pulls data from S/4HANA requires extra SAP licenses. Include language that clarifies permitted indirect use cases, especially if you plan to use an enterprise service bus, etc., to connect systems.
  • Exit and portability terms: Plan your exit from day one. Sovereign clouds can be even stickier than normal, so negotiate strong off-boarding rights. You’ll want clauses for data export (e.g. SAP must provide your data in a usable format within X days of contract end or your notice), data retention period (how long will they keep it accessible to you after termination – you may need a few weeks or months for transition), and secure deletion (SAP should certify that after a certain point, data is wiped and any backups destroyed, in line with your regulatory needs). Also, consider encryption keys: if you provided your own keys, you’ll want to either destroy them at the end or return them (if using an HSM, perhaps you own the device). If SAP held the keys, ensure they can’t just lock you out – you might need them to decrypt an archive during the transition. Assistance is key: migrating out of a sovereign cloud can be complex; try to obtain some level of help from SAP (even if paid, pre-negotiate rates or hours). And importantly, no hefty penalties for exit – you don’t want an enormous data extraction fee. Clarify any charges for data export or extended access if you need a read-only period after termination.

Which SAP Services Can/Can’t Run in Sovereign Cloud

Not every SAP product is available in a sovereign flavor. A significant mistake is assuming you can simply make any SAP service sovereign by flipping a switch.

You need to verify service-by-service availability and constraints.

Here’s a rundown of key workloads:

  • Core ERP and databases: SAP S/4HANA is the flagship ERP that many will run in the sovereign cloud. In practice, this usually means S/4HANA Private Cloud Edition (single-tenant) rather than the multi-tenant “public edition,” because the public SaaS version may not yet support all sovereignty requirements. If you need a fully sovereign S/4HANA, you’ll likely be on the private edition via RISE (or even the on-site model if required). BW/4HANA (data warehouse) can similarly be deployed in a sovereign manner, likely as part of a private cloud stack or on BTP’s sovereign data services. Traditional databases like SAP HANA Cloud are starting to appear in sovereign versions – for instance, SAP HANA Cloud service might now be offered in a sovereign EU region and on AWS GovCloud for the U.S. (check current availability). Older ERP ECC 6.0 isn’t offered as a cloud service by SAP; however, if needed, it can be run in a customer-managed sovereign IaaS (with BYOL, as long as support is handled carefully).
  • Analytics and planning: SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) and SAP Datasphere (formerly Data Warehouse Cloud) are tricky. These are multi-tenant SaaS analytics services. As of 2025, SAP has been working on making Analytics Cloud available in more regions; however, a truly sovereign SAC may not yet exist in all jurisdictions. For example, if you need SAC entirely restricted to, say, a German sovereign cloud, you should confirm if SAP offers it or if an alternative is needed. It may be that SAC can be hosted in the EU, but some backend components still call global services (possibly a red flag). SAP Datasphere may also have limited availability – you might only get it in a general EU region, rather than a dedicated sovereign stack, which could pose compliance issues for highly sensitive data. If analytics is crucial, you might consider running your own analytics solution in-region as an interim if SAP’s isn’t ready.
  • HR and procurement SaaS (SuccessFactors, Ariba, Fieldglass, Concur): These SAP-owned cloud products present some of the biggest sovereignty challenges. They were built as global multi-tenant clouds and often have centralized data centers per major region (but not per country), as well as global support models. SuccessFactors (HR) typically has an EU data center for EU customers, which may suffice for some European regulations, but it’s not truly sovereign (since support and operations are global). For defense or government, even that might not be acceptable. Currently, there isn’t a special “SuccessFactors Sovereign Edition” publicly known, so if you require extreme control, you might have to keep HR on-premise or accept it as a regulated carve-out with extra contract assurances. Ariba (procurement network) is similarly global – part of its value is connecting companies worldwide, so isolating it defeats the purpose. SAP likely cannot offer a fully sovereign Ariba network; instead, they might offer an on-premise or private network deployment for a particular government (with limited supplier connectivity). Those decisions become case-by-case. Fieldglass (contingent labor) and Concur (travel and expense) are also likely to lack sovereign versions; they may be hosted in the US primarily, which is a non-starter for some governments. If these are in scope, you may need to negotiate special terms (like all data stored in the EU, or the right to self-host certain components, or use an alternate provider).
  • Industry/LoB solutions: SAP has a variety of industry cloud solutions (for example, utilities, healthcare, defense, etc.). Some may be available on the SAP BTP sovereign environment if they’re built on BTP. Others might not. SAP Signavio (process analysis/mining) is a cloud service that, as of now, is usually EU or US hosted; check if a sovereign EU deployment exists or is roadmapped. Industry cloud apps delivered via partners could potentially run on a sovereign BTP if supported. Always ask SAP for a service catalog for the Sovereign Cloud region you’ll use – it should list exactly which services (and versions) are available there.
  • SAP BTP services: The Business Technology Platform is broad – it includes integration (SAP Integration Suite), extensions (running custom apps on Cloud Foundry or the ABAP environment), database (SAP HANA Cloud), AI services, mobile services, and more. In a sovereign environment, only a subset of BTP services will be active. For example, you might get core services like integration, basic DBaaS, and maybe some AI services that have been localized. However, cutting-edge or niche services (such as a machine learning service that utilizes an SAP AI engine hosted globally) may not be available within the boundary. If your solution relies on a specific BTP component, verify it’s in the catalog. If not, you may need a workaround (maybe deploy a similar function manually on a local platform). Keep an eye on AI-related services, especially as SAP touts “Business AI” features. Ensure that any AI feature in S/4 or BTP either runs locally or can be disabled if it is called out. The EU AI Act and similar regulations may even require that certain AI processing on personal data remains in-region, making this an evolving area.
  • Third-party add-ons and marketplace solutions: If you use software from SAP’s Store or partners (like a monitoring tool, a plugin for S/4, etc.), check compatibility with sovereign cloud. They might require connectivity to an external cloud service (which could violate sovereignty if not allowed). Ideally, third-party solutions used in the sovereign landscape should either be deployed within that same environment or have a local instance. You may need certifications or statements from those vendors that they will also keep data in-region. For instance, a popular tax calculation engine or a fraud detection service integrated with SAP might normally run in a U.S. cloud, which is not suitable for a sovereign entity. Negotiate the right to approve any data egress to third parties and require them to meet the same standards.
  • Hidden operations (“gotchas”): Even if a service is officially available, ask SAP how it operates under the hood. Examples of gotchas: Does the system send crash reports or telemetry to SAP developers outside the region? Are there any background jobs (like virus scanning or search indexing) that rely on global cloud infrastructure? What about disaster recovery? Sometimes, SAP might say data is in country X, but their DR site is in country Y (though within the EU, for example). If that’s the case, is that acceptable or not? Also, support processes: if a support bot or automated tool is used, does it run locally or connect to SAP HQ systems? You want to catch these details up front. A true sovereign offering should have answers like “telemetry is kept local or turned off except what’s contractually allowed,” “DR is within the same jurisdiction or a pre-approved paired country,” etc. Don’t be shy about drilling into the technical specifics – it’s better to know now than to be surprised in an audit.

In short, do your homework service-by-service. Get SAP to document which components are included in your sovereign environment and which are not.

If something you need is missing, you can either lobby for a roadmap commitment or decide whether to handle that outside of SAP’s cloud (which may then not be sovereign).

The worst scenario is assuming everything is covered, only to find out after signing that a critical piece (say, SuccessFactors or an analytics tool) can’t be deployed as needed.

Technical Guardrails & Architecture Questions (Ask Before You Sign)

Sovereign cloud deals require thorough technical due diligence.

Before you sign a contract, assemble your architects and security team to go through a checklist of technical questions with SAP.

Here are the key areas and what to ask:

  • Identity and access management: How will user identities be handled? If you use SAP’s Identity Authentication Service or any IdP, ensure the identity data (user accounts, credentials) is stored in-region. Ask if the authentication requests ever get routed through global systems. Also, clarify how admin access to the cloud environment is controlled: Who holds the admin accounts for the SAP systems and cloud platform? You’ll want a model where your admins have control, and SAP’s admins are only involved under strict processes. Discuss “break-glass” procedures: if an emergency fix is needed at 3 AM, can a global SAP team member log in, or is there a local team on call? Ideally, even break-glass access should require your approval (maybe you provide a one-time decryption key or token to allow it). And for any admin action SAP takes, ask if you can get operator logs. In a sovereign context, you likely will want logs of who accessed the system, when, and what they did – especially SAP’s operators – as evidence for compliance. Those logs should be available to you and stored securely (and not shipped out to a global logging service).
  • Encryption and key management: Encryption is your friend in sovereignty. Confirm that all data at rest is encrypted (it should be, by default, in the cloud, but validate the policies and algorithms meet your standards or local certs). More importantly, clarify if you can use Customer Managed Keys (CMK). This means you supply the encryption keys via a local key management system or HSM that you control. Many sovereign setups allow this: SAP operates the service, but whenever it needs to decrypt data, it calls your key vault (which is in-region under your governance). That way, if you revoke or destroy the key, the data becomes unreadable – an extra assurance. If CMK isn’t available, at least ensure SAP’s key is in an in-country HSM and see if dual control is in place (e.g., no single SAP admin can extract a key). Ask about key rotation policies (how often keys are changed) and if you’ll be involved in that process. If you do supply keys, clarify responsibilities: if something goes wrong with the key vault, do you have support from SAP to recover? Also, ensure in-transit encryption is enforced for all connections, including internal ones. No plaintext data should move even within the local data center.
  • Networking and connectivity: Your sovereign cloud should ideally be connected to your corporate network via private links (VPN or direct connect) so that users and on-premises systems can access it without traversing the public internet. Confirm that this is possible and included. Additionally, ask about egress points: does any data or traffic need to leave the region? For instance, if users from other regions connect, is there any reason data would route outside? Also consider traffic inspection – do you need to inspect data leaving the cloud (for compliance, you might want to ensure no PII is accidentally being sent to a third party). If so, can SAP provide a feed of network logs or allow your security appliances to be inserted? Cross-region replication is another network topic: for HA/DR, if they propose replicating data to another data center, make sure it’s within the same legal boundary (e.g., within the EU, or within the same country if required by law). If only one data center is used (to strictly stay in-country), ask how they handle disaster recovery – is there at least a second site in-country or some alternative strategy?
  • Observability and monitoring: Where do monitoring and logging data go? SAP operates many centralized monitoring tools for its cloud; in a sovereign mode, these tools need to be scoped to your environment or deployed locally. Confirm that application logs, security logs, and audit logs will be stored in-region, and that you have access to them. Many customers will want to feed these logs into their own SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) system for real-time alerts. Ensure SAP can facilitate that (either by pushing logs to a syslog endpoint you provide or by allowing an agent). Ask if any performance or usage telemetry (like usage statistics that help SAP improve the product) is sent out – if yes, you may want to opt out. Also, if there’s a security incident, what’s the process? Do they have local forensic tools? You may require that any forensic analysis (memory dumps, disk images) be conducted in-country, and if external expertise is needed, it should be provided under supervision or via secure means.
  • Backup and Disaster Recovery: This is crucial. Backups should be stored in-region, ideally encrypted and isolated. Verify how often backups are taken, where they are stored, and who can access them. If the sovereign requirement is country-specific, then even backups must not be in another country. (Sometimes cloud providers back up to multi-region buckets; not okay unless within your boundary). For Disaster Recovery (DR), if your mandate allows, you might have primary in Country A and DR in Country B (if they are politically aligned or in the same union). For example, some European governments might accept DR in France, but not in Germany, or not in the U.S., as is obvious. Clearly state what is acceptable. Also, get the RPO/RTO commitments in writing: e.g., “in the event of a site failure, data loss will be at most 15 minutes (RPO) and service restored in 4 hours (RTO)”. These might be in a service level agreement. Since sovereign clouds could have fewer sites, you want to know they have a solid continuity plan. And ask about DR testing – will SAP conduct regular DR drills? Can you witness or get reports of the results? Regulators often love to see evidence that the DR actually works, not just promises.
  • Patching and support model: Understand how software updates (patches, upgrades) are applied in your environment. If SAP needs to apply patches to S/4HANA or the underlying systems, where is the patching team located? Ideally, patches are applied by the local operations team. However, sometimes the patch itself might be built or delivered from global SAP. Ensure that any patch files or tools imported are scanned and deemed safe (you may also want an option to review them if you have ultra-secure requirements). The support model is another significant one: typically, cloud support is follow-the-sun. For a sovereign, SAP may establish a local support team or a “ring-fenced” support process. Ask if your support tickets will be handled by in-region support staff. If a critical issue arises, can it be solved without involving someone from abroad? If not, what controls ensure that the person only sees what they need to? Some sovereign contracts have a “two-man rule” (dual control) for foreign access – e.g., a local person must escort or pair with any remote person. Also, clarify escalation: if the local team can’t solve a problem, how do they tap SAP’s global experts? Possibly via screen-sharing rather than handing over credentials, etc. Make sure these procedures are spelled out in the operations guide and that you’re comfortable with them.
  • Data lifecycle and deletion: Ask SAP to outline how data is managed over its life. When you delete or archive data, is it fully wiped from disks, or just marked for deletion? A sovereign environment should have a defined data deletion standard, often aligning with standards such as ISO or NIST guidelines for data sanitization. This is important at contract end (as discussed), but also on a day-to-day basis. If an employee asks to have their data removed (to comply with GDPR right-to-be-forgotten), can SAP confirm it’s removed from all systems, including logs, caches, and backups (as far as legally allowed)? Additionally, will they provide deletion certificates or audit reports? Immutable logs are another aspect: some security logs might need to be kept in a tamper-proof way for investigations. Does the environment support this (perhaps by writing to WORM storage in-country)? And suppose there’s a legal hold (say your company is in litigation or subject to an investigation). How will SAP ensure that data that would normally be deleted is held, and again, kept in the jurisdiction? eDiscovery: If you need to extract data (emails, records) for a legal case, can SAP support that without moving data to an out-of-region tool?
  • AI and analytics processing: Since 2025 is big on AI, clarify what AI features your SAP products have and how they work in sovereign mode. If S/4HANA or BTP has embedded AI (like SAP’s AI-driven recommendations or chatbot), find out where those models are hosted and trained. Ensure no data is being sent to a global AI cloud inadvertently. You might have to disable certain features or request that they use local AI models only. Also, if you plan to use SAP’s AI services (e.g., Business AI or industry-specific ML), check if those can be deployed or at least isolated for your environment. Some companies opt out of allowing their data to be used to train vendors’ AI. If that’s you, explicitly state that in the contract (some DPAs allow you to opt out of data being used for service improvements). Attestations are key here too: you might want SAP to attest that “no customer data leaves the environment for machine learning purposes without consent” or similar.

In summary, don’t sign on the dotted line until you’ve gotten satisfactory answers to all these technical questions. The goal is to avoid assumptions. If SAP says “we think so” or “probably” to any of these, pause – they should verify and, if important, include it in the contract or documentation.

A sovereign cloud is often scrutinized by your security and compliance officers, maybe even regulators, so everything from admin access to DR should be airtight.

Negotiation Playbook (Sovereign-Specific Levers)

Negotiating an SAP contract is always complex, but with sovereign cloud in the mix, there are additional levers and precautions to consider.

Here’s a playbook of strategies to protect your interests and get a fair deal:

  • Get sovereignty in writing, with teeth. As emphasized, ensure all the sovereignty promises are explicitly documented in the contract. But beyond that, press for remedies if they’re breached. For example, if SAP or its subcontractor violates the data residency clause, what happens? You might negotiate a right to terminate certain services or receive penalties/credits if any sovereign control is broken. Without consequences, a clause is just words. Aim to include specific metrics or reporting (like quarterly certifications of compliance, which, if missed, trigger service credits). The key is to treat sovereignty like an SLA, not just a policy.
  • Freeze the architecture and services. One risk is SAP changing something mid-stream – maybe introducing a new monitoring tool that sends data out of region, or deciding to migrate your system to a new data center for efficiency. Negotiate a freeze on the service architecture: the set of data centers, major subprocessors, and data flows should not change without your approval. If SAP launches a new feature that requires an external connection, you should have the right to opt in or out. Essentially, the deal you sign is the deal you get for the term, unless you agree otherwise. Include wording that any changes to the sovereignty model or service scope must be approved by you in writing (or at least notified with an option to terminate if it violates your requirements).
  • Price the sovereignty uplift separately and cap it at a certain level. Often, SAP will bundle the sovereign cloud pricing into the overall price. Insist on seeing the breakdown: how much extra are we paying for sovereignty versus standard cloud? Once identified, try to capitalize on that uplift for future growth. For instance, if sovereign users cost 20% more than regular, maybe cap it so if you add more users later, that 20% doesn’t increase or can even reduce at higher volumes. Use tiered discounts to your advantage: “If we add X more users or extend to more modules, we get better pricing.” The vendor might argue their costs are high, but volume is volume. Also, leverage commitment to other SAP products – if you are also buying, say, SuccessFactors or analytics, get cross-product discounts or credits. Migration credits are key: if you’re moving from on-prem, you likely have sunk costs and data center exit costs; ask SAP for one-time credits or free migration services to offset those. If you have unused on-prem licenses (shelfware) that you will drop after moving to the cloud, push for a conversion credit – e.g., the maintenance you would have paid for those licenses for the next 2 years gets knocked off your cloud bill.
  • Support model assurances: In sovereign deals, support can be a weakness if not defined. Negotiate support SLAs that fit your needs: for example, critical issues must have a response within 1 hour and be resolved within 4 hours (or escalated). However, more uniquely, specify the location of support personnel for different tiers. Perhaps level 1 and 2 support must be delivered by the local team. If level 3 (deep engineering) requires global experts, define how that will work under sovereignty constraints. You could require that any L3 support accessing your system is logged and approved, and possibly that SAP provides a report of such accesses after the fact. Include a clause that SAP must maintain a certain number of cleared local support staff – so they can’t quietly shift your support to a cheaper offshore team halfway through (which would violate sovereignty anyway). Knowing who supports you also reduces the risk of blame-shifting (“Oh, that issue couldn’t be resolved because only the global team knew how…”).
  • Demand regular compliance artifacts: Treat SAP almost like you would any outsourcing provider in a regulated industry – you have the right to audit and inspect. While you might not physically audit their data center (though some regulators might), you can ask for documents and evidence. Write into the contract that SAP will provide you with, for instance, annual SOC 2 or ISO 27001 reports covering the sovereign environment, results of any penetration tests or security assessments (or at least a summary and confirmation that issues were resolved), and quarterly reports on operator access (who from SAP accessed your systems). Additionally, consider holding a compliance meeting quarterly or annually to review any incidents, changes, or upcoming regulatory changes. These artifacts help you satisfy your internal auditors and regulators that the solution remains compliant. Without explicit terms, you might struggle to get them later (or only get generic global reports).
  • Nail down exit rights and assistance. Reiterate in negotiation that you need a safe exit if things change. Try to include a clause that allows you to terminate the service without penalty if laws change, making it non-compliant (e.g., new regulations or a Schrems III scenario). Additionally, the confirmation of no-cost data export should be verified. Some cloud contracts are silent on assistance, leading vendors to charge hefty professional services fees to help you get data out. Include a reasonable amount of off-boarding support at no extra charge. This could be something like “SAP will, upon request within 30 days of termination, export the Customer Data in format X and provide technical assistance up to Y hours for data extraction, at no additional cost.” If you anticipate a large migration at the end of the term, maybe you negotiate upfront a capped cost or predefined SOW for that now (so you’re not at their mercy later). And ensure data persistence: you may want the systems to remain operational (read-only) for a few weeks after the term to verify that everything has been moved – ask for an optional extension period at a prorated cost or include it in the contract.
  • Future flexibility (co-termination, expansions, mix-and-match): Corporate changes happen – mergers, acquisitions, divestitures. Include clauses that allow transferring the contract to an affiliate or splitting it if needed. Suppose your company acquires another entity that needs to join the sovereign environment. In that case, there should be a mechanism to add them (with pricing already defined, or at least at similar discount terms). Conversely, if you divest a business, you might want to carve out part of the cloud services for them or terminate a portion – address if partial termination is allowed (usually not, but maybe you can substitute with other use). Another angle: you might not need everything to be sovereign. For example, your European operations may require it, but your U.S. or APJ operations can use a standard cloud. Can you allocate some of your licenses to regular cloud deployments outside the sovereign boundary? SAP may resist mixing, but if legally permissible (and data doesn’t overlap), having the flexibility to run a non-sovereign instance for less regulated parts of the business could save money. Try to negotiate a right to split or reallocate capacity between sovereign and non-sovereign environments. At the very least, ensure if you later decide a system no longer needs sovereign treatment, you could switch to a cheaper cloud option (maybe at renewal).
  • No blame gaps – demand end-to-end accountability. Since SAP often leverages hyperscalers (such as Azure, AWS, and Google) behind the scenes for infrastructure, ensure your contract doesn’t allow SAP to shift responsibility. The agreement should state that SAP is fully responsible for all subcontractors (including the cloud provider) in delivering the sovereign controls. If AWS has an outage in the GovCloud region or if Microsoft’s compliance fails, SAP should not be able to declare force majeure without consequences. Push for transparency: ask to see the flow-down terms SAP has with the hyperscaler regarding data residency and support. They might not show you the whole contract, but they could include key assurances in your contract by reference. If you can’t get that, at least include a provision that SAP must notify you of any material changes in the underlying provider’s compliance status or terms. Essentially, SAP is the single throat to choke – you shouldn’t have to chase Amazon or Microsoft if something goes wrong.

Remember, you have more leverage than you think if you’re a sizable customer in a regulated industry – SAP wants those cloud wins. Use that leverage to incorporate these protections.

A sovereign cloud deal done right means you pay a premium for risk reduction, so make sure you actually get that risk reduction.

Cost Control & Optimization in Sovereign

Running a sovereign cloud environment will almost always cost more than a standard cloud setup – but there are still ways to keep costs in check.

Here are strategies to manage and reduce costs while staying compliant:

  • Right-size and right-license from day one. Don’t let the “compliance needs” scare you into over-provisioning. For example, if SAP proposes a top-tier license for all users “because it’s a secure environment,” challenge that. Match user licenses to roles carefully: maybe only a subset of users truly need expensive “Professional” licenses, and others can be “Limited” or occasional users. Also, review the resource sizing: if SAP sizes your system very large to be safe, consider starting with a smaller size and scaling up if needed. Sometimes vendors oversize for performance headroom that never gets used – in a sovereign setup with fewer customers on the hardware, this is a common occurrence.
  • Phased migrations to align spend with value. If you’re migrating multiple systems or regions into this new cloud, stage the rollout. For instance, in year 1, you move a dev/test system and one production workload, and only pay for those. In year 2, you add more. Negotiate the contract so that charges increase as you reach key milestones or add users. Avoid paying for everything from day one if you won’t use it – this reduces your TCO and also keeps some budget for unforeseen needs. A ramp-up ladder can often be structured in the order form (e.g., 50% of subscription fee in the first 6 months, 75% in months 7-12, 100% thereafter). Ensure this aligns with your project plan; if the project slips, try to have flexibility to delay the ramp a bit. And if SAP is providing migration services, consider tying payments to the completion of those milestones (milestone-based acceptance).
  • Turn off what you don’t use. In a bundled environment like RISE, you may get a lot of included services (like some BTP credits or tools like SAP Cloud ALM for monitoring). If you’re not going to use certain components, see if they can be removed or at least not charged. If that’s not possible (maybe it’s all one price), at least ensure they’re disabled so they don’t accidentally generate costs or risks. For example, if your sovereign BTP has an active connection to some global service you won’t use, have it shut off. This also applies to consumption services: continuously monitor what you’re consuming (like storage, compute hours on BTP, etc.) and de-provision unused resources. Many cloud cost overruns come from forgetting to turn something off. Treat the sovereign environment with the same cost discipline as any cloud – perhaps more, since you might not have the same breadth of cost management tools available, you may need manual oversight.
  • License recycling and governance: Especially if you have named-user licenses in the cloud, enforce a strong joiner/mover/leaver process. When employees leave or change roles, reclaim their licenses promptly. In some SAP cloud models, you commit to several users whether used or not, but you may still have the flexibility to reassign licenses internally. The goal is to avoid buying more licenses because you lost track of who isn’t using theirs. Also, review usage periodically: for instance, if you have 1,000 users but only 800 log in each month, you may want to adjust the contract at renewal to 800 (with some buffer). This ties back to negotiating step-down rights or, at the very least, not renewing unused capacity.
  • Test performance and capacity assumptions early. Before you commit to the full boat, insist on a pilot or proof-of-concept in the sovereign environment. This pilot could be a smaller sandbox or a non-critical system migrated as a trial. Two reasons: (1) It verifies that SAP can actually deliver the performance and user experience in the sovereign data center – maybe the network latency is higher than expected, or some process runs slower. If issues arise, you can adjust sizing (maybe need more compute – better to know now and negotiate it in, or conversely, you find you overestimated). (2) It builds confidence to proceed and can catch any hidden costs (e.g., suddenly you learn that backups aren’t included and cost extra, which you can then negotiate). A pilot might even be negotiated as a paid trial with an exit if it fails, giving you a safe way out if SAP’s sovereign setup isn’t up to par. If the pilot goes well, you scale up; if not, you have leverage to ask SAP to fix things or adjust pricing.
  • Ongoing usage reviews and true-up discipline: Once live, don’t fall asleep at the wheel. Conduct quarterly business reviews with SAP, focusing on usage and costs. Compare actual users and consumption to what you licensed. If you see a trend of growth, plan ahead – maybe you can pre-purchase more at a discount rather than pay overage fees. If you see unused capacity, flag it for potential reduction at renewal. Many contracts allow an annual true-up: you report how many users or how much storage you actually used, and then pay for the excess (or sometimes get credit if under). Ensure the contract includes price protection for any additional users or consumption (e.g., the same discounted unit price as the initial ones, not the list price). And if you have a chance to true-down (rare, but in some cases it allows reducing if you overshot), take advantage of that with proper internal approval. This active management can prevent small overruns from compounding into huge bills.
  • Optimize license types and systems architecture: In some cases, sovereign requirements might let you consolidate systems. For example, if you were running separate instances for different countries, you might now consolidate them into one sovereign landscape, if regulations allow – potentially reducing duplicate licensing. On the flip side, if you split one global system into two (so that EU data is separate from others), be mindful of licensing: splitting might mean needing extra licenses for separate systems (like separate HANA database licenses). Negotiate with SAP that splitting for compliance reasons should not double-charge you; perhaps they can treat it as one logical system for licensing, even if technically two instances. And keep an eye on indirect usage costs – use SAP’s automation where possible (e.g., if using SAP’s own integration in BTP vs a third-party tool, you might avoid some license costs).

In essence, treat cost optimization as an ongoing effort. Sovereignty requirements don’t give SAP a blank check – you still have to run this efficiently like any IT operation.

By right-sizing, phasing, and actively managing the environment, you can significantly reduce the premium typically associated with sovereign cloud and ensure you’re paying for actual value delivered.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even with the best plans, there are common mistakes enterprises make when diving into SAP Sovereign Cloud.

Be aware of these pitfalls so you can steer clear:

  • Treating “sovereign” as a label, not a deliverable. Simply choosing the product named “Sovereign Cloud” doesn’t guarantee success. The pitfall is assuming the job is done because the contract has the word “sovereign” on it. In reality, you must operationalize those promises – configure the systems correctly, audit them, and stay engaged. Also, ensure everyone in your team knows that sovereign isn’t just a new shiny badge; it requires ongoing diligence (for example, following processes when interacting with support or making changes).
  • Accepting vague contractual language. We can’t stress enough: watch out for terms like “commercially reasonable efforts” or “as permitted by law” without specifics. If the sovereignty obligations are not clear-cut and enforceable, you basically have a best-effort cloud. That may not hold up under regulatory scrutiny. Always push back on ambiguity – if a clause says “data will remain in region except where not feasible,” that “not feasible” needs definition or removal. Many pitfalls happen when, during an incident, the vendor says, “Well, it wasn’t feasible to keep that log in-country, so we moved it to the US to debug.” Don’t leave those gaps.
  • Assuming every SAP service is available in sovereign form. We covered this, but it bears repeating as a pitfall: companies sign a sovereign cloud deal expecting to later enable other SAP cloud products, only to find they can’t. For instance, you might plan to roll out SAP’s latest analytics or mobile app a year from now – but after signing, you learn it’s not offered in your sovereign region. Now you’re stuck or have to build an exception. Avoid this by creating a roadmap of all SAP products you use or intend to use and verifying their availability or alternative plan. If something isn’t available now, get a commitment (in writing, ideally with a date) or have a contingency (maybe keep that one system on-prem or in a different environment).
  • Leaving integration and indirect use questions for later. In highly regulated environments, integration can be complex (lots of local systems, data hubs, etc.). A pitfall is not addressing how these integrations will be licensed and managed securely up front. For example, if you plan to replicate data from S/4HANA to a local data lake for analytics, is that allowed in your contract, or does SAP consider that a separate use case requiring extra licensing? Also, the technical setup: ensure from day one that any interfaces do not inadvertently send data out-of-bounds (like a cloud integration flow accidentally pointing to an endpoint outside the region). It’s much easier to design integrations correctly at the start than to untangle them after an audit finds an issue.
  • Ignoring exit and data deletion mechanics until it’s too late. Some clients focus heavily on onboarding and forget about offboarding. Then, when it’s time to exit (or renegotiate), they find themselves locked in because they didn’t secure data export rights or realize it takes 6 months to migrate out terabytes of data, and SAP will shut off access in 30 days. Avoid this by always having an exit plan as part of your cloud strategy. Even if you intend this to be a long relationship, knowing you can leave gives you leverage and peace of mind. It also forces you to keep your data organized (perhaps by regularly taking your own backups or extracts, just in case).
  • Overcommitting “because we’re regulated.” We’ve seen organizations sign very large, inflexible contracts for sovereign clou,d thinking they have no choice due to compliance pressure. Yes, compliance is not optional, but that doesn’t mean you should accept a bad deal or oversize everything. Don’t buy 10,000 user licenses if you have 5,000 staff, assuming you’ll double just because regulators are watching. Scale your resources to meet your actual needs and use protective clauses rather than brute force oversubscription. Regulators care that you have control and security, not that you spent extra millions for unused capacity. Similarly, if SAP pushes a full suite of products “for compliance completeness,” scrutinize each – maybe you don’t need all of them, or there are cheaper alternatives for some parts.
  • Neglecting internal process changes. A subtle pitfall: moving to sovereign cloud often requires changes in how your internal teams operate. For example, if the system is locked down, your IT team might have fewer direct access points and need to go through SAP for certain tasks. If not communicated, this can frustrate teams or lead to someone inadvertently breaching protocol (like a developer trying to open a support ticket and unknowingly sending a data dump to SAP that goes out-of-region). Train and brief your teams about the new model. Establish clear processes for tasks such as incident handling, change management, and compliance checks. The technology can meet sovereign rules, but people and processes must also follow them.

Avoiding these pitfalls comes down to due diligence and maintaining a healthy skepticism throughout the project.

Think a few steps ahead about what could go wrong or be misunderstood, and address it upfront. It’s much easier to solve on paper in the contract or in planning than when you’re in the middle of an incident or audit.

Negotiation Scenarios: Examples of Cost and Risk Outcomes

To illustrate how negotiation can impact your costs and risks in a sovereign cloud deal, here are a few real-world-inspired scenarios.

Each scenario shows a baseline (what SAP might propose) versus a negotiated outcome, along with potential savings and risk reduction:

ScenarioBaseline Proposal (from SAP)Negotiated OutcomeEstimated SavingsRisk Reduced
S/4HANA Private + BTP in Sovereign Cloud (Public Sector)
Large government agency moving ERP and BTP extension to sovereign cloud.
High sovereign premium on RISE subscription (e.g. +25% cost) and vague clauses on admin access (SAP’s proposal just says “SAP will strive to use local resources”).Capped uplift at 10% with possibility to reduce if more users added; Explicit operator residency clause (admin must be citizens of country) in contract; and quarterly access reports provided to customer.~12% of total contract value (TCO) saved over term.Greatly reduced uncertainty around data access – customer can verify no foreign admin access, and has recourse if policy is breached. Forensics and compliance gaps closed.
BTP AI Services in Sovereign Environment
Company wants to use SAP’s AI services, but SAP says they’re not available in sovereign region.
“Not available – use global region”: SAP’s initial stance is that the AI/machine learning services can only run in a global cloud, meaning the customer would have to send data outside or forgo AI features.Alternative solution secured: Negotiated a compromise where SAP provides sovereign-approved alternative services (e.g. a local third-party AI tool integrated) and a roadmap commitment that SAP’s own AI service will be available in-region by a certain date. Until then, contract explicitly forbids any customer data egress for AI processing.Avoided a costly re-architecture or compliance exception – savings in the sense of not needing a separate global environment or manual process (potentially hundreds of thousands in integration costs avoided).Data remains within jurisdiction, eliminating a major data export risk. The company also has it in writing that they’ll get the needed AI functionality in a compliant way, or they have remedies if not delivered.
“RISE Sovereign” 5-Year Deal
Enterprise signing a 5-year RISE with SAP sovereign contract for multiple systems.
Fixed 5-year term, no flexibility: All 5 years locked in with a high user count from day one, and no ability to reduce if business needs change. Essentially a 5-year commit on full capacity (often to get a discount, SAP wants commitment).3+2 Year structure with step-downs: Negotiated a 3-year firm term + 2-year extension option (giving the customer an out or renegotiation after 3 years if needed), and an annual step-down right of 10% on user counts (meaning each year, they can adjust down the licenses by up to 10% if they overestimated). Pricing also locked so if they add more users, it’s at the same discounted rate.15–20% cost reduction over the 5 years (due to not paying for unused capacity and retaining negotiation leverage at the 3-year mark).Avoided over-licensing and long-term lock-in risk. If the company’s headcount or usage drops, they aren’t stuck overpaying for idle licenses. Also reduced risk of being trapped if better options or regulatory changes come in 3 years – they have an opportunity to revisit terms.

These scenarios highlight how specific negotiation levers (like uplift caps, contractually defined controls, phased commitments, and roadmap guarantees) can translate directly into savings and risk mitigation. Always tie your asks to a tangible outcome – vendors are more amenable when they see it solves a problem rather than just haggling.

Five Best Practices for Sovereign Decisions

To wrap up, here are five best-practice principles every organization should follow when considering and implementing SAP Sovereign Cloud:

  1. Contractualize Your Sovereignty: Don’t settle for verbal assurances. Every sovereignty requirement – data location, local staff, encryption standards, access logs – should be written into the contract with clear measures and remedies. This turns a fuzzy concept into a deliverable service.
  2. Freeze the Service Catalog: At the start of your term, lock down the scope of services and tools that will be used. Require that any new component (especially anything that transmits data or metadata out of the sovereign boundary) must be reviewed and approved by you. This prevents back-door changes that could compromise compliance.
  3. Right-Size (Sovereign ≠ Premium for All): Just because it’s a high-security environment doesn’t mean every component must be top-shelf or overscaled. Tailor licenses and infrastructure to actual needs. For example, use a mix of license types and only give expensive full-access accounts to those who truly need them. Treat cost optimization as seriously as you would in any other project.
  4. Pilot and Prove First: Avoid “big bang” commitments. Test critical workloads in the sovereign setup early on – even before finalizing the full contract if possible. Ensure performance, functionality, and support meet your expectations. This de-risks the rollout and provides you with concrete evidence for any necessary adjustments. No blind leaps of faith.
  5. Design Your Exit on Day One: The end of the journey is as important as the start. From the beginning, plan how you would export data, transition systems, revoke access, and shut down if needed. Ensure the vendor is obligated to assist and that you have the necessary tools to do so. A well-designed exit strategy not only prepares you for unforeseen changes, it also keeps the vendor honest throughout the relationship (they know you have an out).

These best practices will help ensure that your foray into SAP’s Sovereign Cloud genuinely serves your organization’s interests – providing the compliance and control you need, without unnecessary cost or risk surprises.

Related articles

Technical & Licensing FAQs

Finally, let’s address some frequently asked questions about SAP Sovereign Cloud in plain language:

Q: Is SAP Sovereign Cloud just a special data center or region?
A: No – it’s much more. While it does use in-country or dedicated data centers, “Sovereign Cloud” is a combination of contractual, operational, and technical measures. Simply being in a local region doesn’t guarantee that your data is sovereign; the entire stack of controls (data, access, and legal framework) makes it sovereign.

Q: Can I run all of SAP’s cloud services in a sovereign model?
A: Not all. Many core services, such as S/4HANA, BW/4HANA, and certain BTP services, are available in sovereign environments. However, several SAP SaaS offerings (SuccessFactors, Ariba, Concur, etc.) and certain advanced BTP or AI services might not be available yet in sovereign form. Always check the current service catalog for the sovereign region – you may find some services are “global only” for now.

Q: Does choosing a sovereign cloud change how SAP licenses its software?
A: Often, yes. There may be specific SKUs or packages for sovereign cloud (e.g., “RISE with SAP Sovereign Edition”). Pricing might include an uplift, and terms in the license agreement will differ (especially around support and usage). Also, some license metrics might change if you convert on-prem licenses to cloud. Expect a bit more complexity in the contract, and take the time to understand the licensing rules that apply to your sovereign environment (like indirect access rules or user definitions, which should be clearly spelled out).

Q: Can I bring my existing SAP licenses into the sovereign cloud (BYOL)?
A: It depends. If you plan to let SAP fully manage the environment (as in RISE or a SaaS model), typically you convert your licenses to a subscription – you don’t literally bring your perpetual license, because SAP is giving you a bundled service. However, if you choose to run SAP software on your own in a sovereign IaaS (in a self-managed way), you could use your existing licenses, but you’d still need to get support via SAP (or a local SAP partner or SAP NS2 in the US). In any case, don’t assume BYOL is a given – confirm with SAP which products allow it and what the support plan is. And watch out for needing to “trade-in” licenses; negotiate the credit for that if so.

Q: How do we keep costs under control in a sovereign cloud?
A: Treat it like any cloud with an extra cost layer. This means actively managing your usage (turn off unused services, keep an eye on user counts), negotiating away unnecessary costs (e.g., maybe you don’t need a premium add-on for every user), and phasing your deployment so you’re not paying for capacity you don’t use early on. Also, negotiate price protections and avoid signing up for more than you need. Regularly review consumption and adjust where possible. A sovereign cloud will cost more than a vanilla cloud, but the difference can be trimmed with smart planning and negotiation.

Q: What’s the biggest risk in adopting SAP Sovereign Cloud?
A: The biggest risk is false confidence – i.e., signing off based on marketing without verifying the reality. If you assume “SAP will handle everything because it’s ‘sovereign’” and don’t dig into details, you could end up non-compliant or with nasty surprises (like a service you needed isn’t available, or data leaked because a small setting was missed). In short, the risk is thinking you bought a guarantee and later finding out it wasn’t airtight. The remedy is to ensure everything is enforceable, evidenced, and tested. When done correctly, sovereign cloud can significantly reduce regulatory and data exposure risk; however, if done poorly, it can create a false sense of security. Always validate and monitor.

Read about our SAP Advisory Services.

SAP Sovereign Cloud: What CIOs Need to Know Before Committing

Do you want to know more about our SAP Advisory Services?

Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts