Locations

Resources

Careers

Contact

Contact us

SAP negotiations

SAP Pricing Negotiation Tactics: Leverage Points That Drive Down Costs

SAP Pricing Negotiation Tactics: Leverage Points That Drive Down Costs

SAP Pricing Negotiation Tactics

Why This Topic Matters

SAP software is known for its powerful capabilities – and its hefty price tag. For large enterprises, SAP licensing and maintenance can consume a significant portion of the IT budget.

This “cost gravity” of SAP means that even a small percentage saved in negotiations can translate to millions of dollars in cost reduction.

Simply put, getting SAP pricing right is critical for controlling IT spend. For an in‑depth overview of SAP negotiation topics, read our Ultimate Guide to SAP Contract Negotiations.

However, securing a good deal with SAP isn’t as simple as asking for a bigger discount. SAP’s contracts and pricing models are complex, and the vendor’s sales teams are skilled at protecting their margins.

Negotiation finesse is essential. Without a savvy approach, you risk overpaying or locking into terms that favor the vendor.

By contrast, a well-planned negotiation strategy can significantly reduce costs while safeguarding your interests. The goal is to reduce SAP spend by utilizing every available leverage point – not just chasing a percentage off the top.

In the sections below, we’ll explore specific tactics that procurement leads, CIOs, and sourcing managers can use to negotiate better SAP deals.

These go beyond basic haggling and delve into strategic levers, such as bundling, timing, competitive pressure, and contract protections. If SAP licensing costs are weighing on your organization, read on for practical ways to tilt the deal in your favor.

Negotiating S/4HANA Migration Deals

Key Leverage Points in SAP Negotiations

When negotiating SAP contracts or renewals, certain leverage points can give you a stronger hand and drive down the overall cost.

Here are some of the most effective strategies to consider:

  • Bundle products for volume discounts: SAP offers larger discounts for larger deals. By bundling multiple software modules or services into a single negotiation, you can often secure a higher discount tier. For example, instead of purchasing SAP’s finance module, analytics platform, and HR software separately, negotiate them together. A consolidated, high-value purchase can persuade SAP to offer a more substantial overall discount. Be strategic with bundling – include the products and user licenses you truly need across your enterprise. The volume economics of bundling can yield significant savings, as long as you avoid adding unnecessary “shelfware” just to inflate deal size.
  • Leverage multi-year commitments and prepayment: Committing to a multi-year contract (or paying upfront for multiple years) can be a powerful bargaining chip. Software vendors like SAP value predictable, long-term revenue. In exchange for a longer commitment (e.g., a 3- or 5-year agreement), you can negotiate deeper discounts or locked-in pricing. Prepaying some of the contract value can further improve terms – for instance, an additional percentage off the total price. Just ensure your projected usage over those years is realistic; you don’t want to overcommit to more software or users than you will use. A multi-year deal should come with both a better unit price and protections (such as caps on price increases, discussed later).
  • Internal readiness – know your usage and roadmap: Before you even sit down at the negotiating table, do your homework internally. Analyze your current SAP licenses, user counts, and module usage. Identify what licenses are underutilized or completely unused. Many enterprises find that they are paying maintenance on users or components they don’t need – knowledge that can be leveraged in negotiations (for example, asking to eliminate or swap out those licenses to reduce costs). Also, define your future roadmap with SAP: Which modules or expansions will you need in the next 3-5 years? If you plan to roll out new functionality (say, adding SAP SuccessFactors or Ariba in the future), you can mention it during negotiation and potentially bundle that future need into the deal now for a better price. The key is to enter with a clear understanding of what you have, what you currently use, and what you truly need going forward. This internal clarity prevents overbuying and strengthens your case for why certain discounts or terms are justified. In short, know thyself (and thy SAP usage) to negotiate from a position of strength.

By pulling these levers, you shift the discussion from simply “How much discount can we get?” to “How can we structure this deal for maximum value?” Bundling, committing smartly, and being fully aware of your needs are foundational tactics to drive down SAP pricing while ensuring you’re buying the right products in the right quantities.

Timing-Based Tactics

Just as important as what you negotiate is when you negotiate.

Timing can significantly impact the kind of deal SAP is willing to give. Use these timing-based tactics to tilt the odds in your favor:

  • Target quarter-end or fiscal year-end for deals: SAP (like many software vendors) has aggressive quarterly and annual sales targets. End-of-quarter urgency is real – especially at the end of Q4 (SAP’s fiscal year aligns with the calendar year, ending in December). As those deadlines loom, sales reps become highly motivated to close deals and meet quotas. This is when you might see extra discounts or incentives that weren’t available earlier. For example, a pricing offer that was stuck at a 20% discount in mid-year might suddenly improve to 30% or more in late December, just so the representative can meet their year-end target. Plan your procurement schedule to align with these crunch times. Engage in serious negotiations in the final weeks of a quarter, and you could unlock a better price. That said, be prepared: the end-of-quarter rush can be intense. Don’t let SAP’s urgency force you into rushing your own decisions or skipping a thorough review of the contract. Use the time pressure to your advantage, not theirs.
  • Leverage new product releases or upgrade cycles: Monitor SAP’s product cycle and strategic priorities. When SAP launches a new product, module, or cloud service, it is often more flexible and generous in securing early adoption and customer references. For instance, if SAP is heavily promoting a new cloud bundle or the latest S/4HANA upgrade, showing interest in that offering at the negotiation table can lead to extra incentives. You may receive promotional pricing, free trial periods, or additional modules at a reduced cost. Similarly, if you’re negotiating around the time of a major upgrade (like moving from ECC to S/4HANA), SAP may offer special conversion discounts or credits. Aligning your negotiation with these cycles – when SAP is motivated to drive uptake of specific products – can result in a more favorable deal. Ensure that any new product you include brings value to your business; don’t get swayed by a shiny new thing unless it aligns with your roadmap.

Timing tactics often come down to leveraging SAP’s sales calendar and strategic pushes.

When you approach negotiations at moments when SAP needs the deal (for their numbers or product success), you gain leverage to push pricing lower or secure better terms. It’s about picking your moment: a well-timed negotiation can yield savings that wouldn’t be possible in a low-pressure period.

Negotiating SAP Contract Renewals

Competitive Leverage from ERP Alternatives

Nothing grabs a vendor’s attention in a negotiation quite like the specter of competition. Even if you intend to stick with SAP, creating a credible competitive scenario is one of the most potent SAP negotiation tactics to drive down costs.

Here’s how to use alternative options to your advantage:

  • Obtain parallel bids from rival vendors: In any major software sourcing decision (like choosing an ERP platform or significant add-on modules), it pays to engage other providers such as Oracle, Microsoft (Dynamics), or Workday. By running a parallel RFP or seeking quotes from these competitors, you arm yourself with data and alternatives. When SAP knows that you are actively evaluating other solutions, they will sharpen their pencil. For example, if Oracle or Microsoft is willing to offer a compelling package or a lower price for comparable functionality, bring that information to the table with SAP. You don’t necessarily have to divulge every detail (and you might keep vendor names anonymous). Still, you can cite that you have “competitive proposals” and thus need SAP to improve their offer to win or keep your business. The goal is to make it clear that SAP is not your only option, increasing their incentive to offer concessions.
  • Use competition even in renewals: What if you’re not actually shopping for a new ERP, but simply renewing your SAP agreement? You can still create leverage. One approach is to explore third-party support providers for SAP or consider whether a portion of your SAP footprint could be replaced with another solution. Even the hint that you might shift some licenses off SAP maintenance or move a certain workload to a different platform can put pressure on SAP’s sales team. For instance, saying “We’re evaluating moving our HR module to Workday” or “We might use a third-party for support on older SAP systems” signals to SAP that they could lose revenue. Competitive tension isn’t just for new deals; it can be introduced in renewal negotiations to prompt SAP to offer a better price or more favorable terms to retain your account.

The key with competitive leverage is credibility. SAP representatives are seasoned – they can distinguish between an empty threat and a well-researched alternative.

So do your homework: if you invoke a competing ERP or solution, be prepared to discuss why it’s attractive. Even if you fully intend to stay with SAP, acting as a shrewd shopper who could switch makes SAP more likely to concede on pricing and contract terms.

Ultimately, having ERP alternatives in your back pocket strengthens your negotiating position and can lead to significantly improved SAP offers.

Safeguarding Contracts While Negotiating Costs Down

Negotiating a great price is only half the battle in an enterprise software deal. Equally important is protecting yourself with strong contract terms.

You don’t want to win on pricing, only to lose later through an audit surprise or skyrocketing maintenance fees.

Here are key contract safeguards to negotiate alongside cost reductions:

  • Preserve your audit rights and define compliance terms: SAP contracts typically allow the vendor to audit your software usage. In negotiations, ensure you retain reasonable audit rights and processes. For example, you can request clauses that limit audit frequency (e.g., no more than once per year) and require sufficient notice before an audit. Additionally, address indirect access or other compliance gray areas upfront. Try to define how certain third-party interfaces or indirect usage will be counted, or cap the financial exposure from them. The aim is to prevent open-ended audit clauses that SAP could exploit later. Never give up your right to defend or clarify audit findings in exchange for a short-term discount – that’s trading away a safety net. A fair, clearly defined audit clause protects you from nasty surprises and ensures compliance discussions don’t become cost traps.
  • Lock in pricing protections (floors, caps, and extensions): A hard-won discount can evaporate if your contract allows prices to shoot up in the future. Negotiate safeguards like price caps on annual increases for subscriptions or maintenance. For instance, if you sign a cloud deal, insist that renewal rates cannot increase more than a certain percentage (say 5% per year or CPI-based) so you don’t face sticker shock later. If you’re buying perpetual licenses with annual maintenance, ensure the maintenance fee is based on your discounted price, not list price (SAP’s standard maintenance is 22% of license cost – make sure that’s 22% of what you paid, and try to cap the escalation of that base). Also consider pricing floors or carry-forward discounts for additional purchases: negotiate the right to buy more licenses or users later at the same per-unit price or discount percentage you’re getting now. This way, if your usage grows, you won’t be forced to pay a higher price for the expansion. Essentially, cement today’s favorable pricing so future events can’t undo it.
  • Include exit options and flexibility clauses: While you hope the SAP solution will serve you well, circumstances can change. Push for contractual flexibility that allows you to adapt or exit without incurring severe penalties. For example, try to negotiate the ability to terminate or reduce licenses for specific modules if they prove unused or if you divest a business unit. In cloud subscriptions, seek a clause that allows for a percentage reduction at renewal time or a grace period to scale down if needed. If you’re committing to a multi-year term, discuss an “opt-out” or benchmarking clause at certain intervals, or at least reasonable termination fees. Another angle is negotiating swap rights – the option to exchange some licenses for other SAP products of equal value (particularly relevant if you plan to transition from older SAP products to new ones, such as S/4HANA; you might secure credits for legacy licenses). Having exit ramps and flexibility ensures you’re not trapped in a deal that no longer fits your business down the road.

In summary, don’t focus solely on the dollar figure at signing. A truly successful SAP negotiation strikes a balance between cost reduction and strong contract terms.

You want to save money now and also safeguard your company’s interests for the future. By preserving audit rights, capping price increases, and incorporating flexibility, you maintain control and value throughout the life of the SAP agreement, not just on day one.

Anonymized Enterprise Examples

To illustrate how these tactics come together in real scenarios, let’s look at a few anonymized examples of enterprises that negotiated effectively with SAP:

  • Global manufacturer bundles for big volume savings: A global manufacturing conglomerate was expanding SAP usage across its finance, logistics, and supply chain operations in multiple regions. Rather than buying additional licenses in a piecemeal fashion, the company bundled all its needs into one large negotiation. By presenting SAP with a major, multi-module, multi-country deal, they moved into a top discount bracket. SAP, eager to win this marquee expansion, granted an exceptionally steep volume discount (well over 50% off list pricing). The manufacturer only bundled modules it had concrete plans to deploy, avoiding shelfware. The result was a dramatically lower unit cost per license across the board and millions in savings, all while standardizing SAP globally.
  • Retail chain times its renewal for fiscal year-end windfall: A large retail chain in the midst of renewing its SAP contract employed a timing tactic. They knew SAP’s fiscal year-end was a prime time for negotiation. The company deliberately initiated renewal talks several months before expiration, aiming to conclude the discussions in Q4. As December approached, the SAP account team, under pressure to close the renewal that year, significantly improved the offer. In the final stretch, the retailer secured about a 30% discount on their renewal (versus a 15% initial offer) and negotiated more favorable audit terms in the new contract. By timing the deal with SAP’s year-end and being willing to push the decision into the next quarter if needed, the retail chain achieved both a substantial cost reduction and tighter audit safeguards.
  • Financial services firm leverages a competing bid for S/4HANA: A financial services company was evaluating a move to SAP S/4HANA, SAP’s next-gen ERP. Rather than simply accepting SAP’s first proposal, they quietly solicited a proposal from a leading competitor (Workday) for core financials to compare options. Armed with a credible alternative bid, the firm approached SAP. They made it clear that while SAP was preferred for continuity, the numbers had to make sense. Facing competition, SAP responded by clarifying its pricing and adding flexibility. They offered a clearer breakdown of S/4HANA costs, matched some of their competitors’ price points, and included contract terms that allowed customers to convert some existing SAP licenses to S/4HANA at favorable rates. In the end, the financial firm stayed with SAP, but only after the competition-driven negotiations yielded a much better deal structure. The exercise ensured the company got market-competitive pricing and terms that were validated by an outside benchmark.

Each of these examples illustrates a common theme: the company took control of the negotiation by utilizing strategic levers (such as bundling, timing, or competition). It did not passively accept SAP’s terms.

The results were significant cost savings and stronger contracts. These anonymized cases mirror challenges many enterprises face, and they demonstrate that with the right tactics, you can push back on a vendor as formidable as SAP and come out ahead.

Strategies & Tactical Checklist

For organizations preparing to negotiate with SAP, here’s a strategic checklist to ensure you’ve covered all bases before and during the negotiation process. Use this as a roadmap to maximize your leverage and avoid costly oversights:

  • Internal Preparation and Alignment: Begin with a thorough internal review. Audit your current SAP usage – gather data on how many licenses you have, what types, and how they’re being utilized. Identify unused licenses, underused modules, or mismatches (e.g., users assigned higher license levels than necessary). Clean up your internal “shelfware” so you know exactly what you need going forward. Also, assemble your internal team and stakeholders early. Ensure that procurement, IT, finance, and relevant department heads are aligned on objectives and limitations. Mark your SAP contract renewal dates on the calendar and establish a plan to initiate discussions well in advance of any expiration or project kick-off. Early preparation and a unified front will let you enter negotiations with confidence and clarity.
  • External benchmarking and market research: Arm yourself with data about SAP pricing benchmarks in your industry and region. Research what discount percentages and deal terms similar companies have achieved. Use resources like industry reports, user group surveys, or independent consultants who specialize in SAP contract negotiation. Knowing, for example, that “enterprises our size typically get 50% off on an SAP license deal” gives you a solid benchmark to aim for (and to justify that ask to SAP and to your executives). Additionally, understand alternative options in the market – not just to leverage them with SAP, but to ensure SAP’s proposal is genuinely competitive. This could include knowing approximate costs from Oracle or Microsoft, or the cost of third-party support compared to SAP support. Knowledge is power in negotiations; the more pricing intel and competitive data you have, the harder it is for SAP to overcharge or push unfavorable terms unnoticed.
  • Define your negotiation playbook (bundling, timing, competition, protections): Before engaging with SAP’s sales team, outline the key levers you plan to use and the concessions you will request. This “playbook” should include your strategy for bundling (which products or licenses will you combine in the deal – and which ones will you purposely keep out if not needed), and your timing plan (will you aim to finalize at quarter-end, or perhaps use the threat of delay as leverage?). Plan how you will introduce competitive pressure – whether by mentioning that you’re considering other vendors or by presenting a concrete alternative quote. Importantly, decide on the contract protections you must secure: for example, “We will ask for a 5% cap on annual support fee increases” or “We need a clause allowing us to reduce users by 10% at renewal without penalty.” Having these demands laid out in advance prevents them from being forgotten in the heat of negotiation. Think of it as your checklist of asks beyond just “lower the price.” Also, determine your walk-away criteria – know the point at which you would refuse the deal or escalate to higher management, so you don’t cave in under pressure. A well-defined negotiation playbook means you won’t improvise on the fly; instead, you’ll methodically employ each tactic to drive the best possible outcome.

By following this checklist, you ensure that you approach SAP negotiations systematically and strategically. Preparation, data, a clear plan, and a firm grasp of your goals are the key ingredients for successful negotiation. Enterprises that check all these boxes tend to achieve better discounts, more favorable terms, and more sustainable SAP agreements than those that react to the vendor’s moves unprepared.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Even seasoned IT procurement teams can slip up in SAP negotiations if they’re not careful.

Here are some common pitfalls to be wary of – avoiding these will help protect your organization from regret down the line:

  • Don’t sacrifice audit or compliance rights for a cheap deal: In the eagerness to reduce costs, some companies agree to contract terms that hand too much power to SAP’s compliance and audit mechanisms. For example, you might be tempted to accept a clause that allows SAP free rein in audits (or one that implicitly acknowledges a compliance shortfall) in exchange for a larger discount now. This is a mistake. An unfettered audit clause can lead to huge unplanned costs later if SAP decides to pursue indirect usage fees or finds a violation. Always maintain reasonable audit terms and clarity on usage definitions. Never give up your right to challenge or clarify audit findings. A discounted price isn’t worth it if it opens the door to penalties or forced purchases down the road.
  • Avoid overcommitting beyond your needs: SAP sales representatives may encourage you to purchase more than you currently require – extra users, additional modules, or a longer term – by offering a higher discount for the larger commitment. While volume and multi-year deals do drive discounts, be very realistic about your needs. Overcommitting can backfire. If you purchase thousands of licenses “just in case” or lock into a five-year term without a clear five-year plan, you risk paying for software you don’t use or being stuck if business conditions change. Over-buying also increases maintenance costs on all that shelfware. A smarter approach is to negotiate flexibility (like the option to add licenses later at the same rate) rather than purchasing far ahead of demand. Don’t let the allure of a slightly better upfront price push you into an agreement misaligned with your actual usage and growth projections.
  • Don’t wait until the last minute to negotiate: Starting negotiations too late is a common error that weakens your position. If your SAP contract renewal is only a few weeks away and you haven’t begun discussions, SAP holds the advantage – they know you have limited time. They likely can’t switch to an alternative easily under that deadline. This can lead to pressure to accept whatever is presented. Likewise, if you’re looking at a new SAP purchase tied to a project timeline, engaging SAP sales at the eleventh hour gives you little room to maneuver. Always start the process early, giving yourself enough runway to evaluate options, involve other vendors if needed, and comfortably walk away or delay if negotiations aren’t going in your favor. Remember, time is a powerful lever in negotiation. If you control the timing (and have the option to push the deal into next quarter or next year), you can extract better terms. If SAP senses you’re desperate to sign quickly, they’ll be far less inclined to offer concessions.

Avoiding these pitfalls comes down to foresight and balance: keep the long-term consequences in mind, stay disciplined about what you truly need, and manage the negotiation timeline proactively.

By steering clear of these common mistakes, you’ll maintain leverage and end up with a deal that delivers savings without unpleasant surprises later.

Long-Term Governance & Ongoing Savings

Negotiating a favorable SAP contract is a big win – but the work doesn’t stop once the ink is dry.

Leading companies establish ongoing governance practices to ensure they continue to get value from their SAP investment and are ready for future negotiations.

Here are strategies for long-term license management and continuous savings:

  • Implement continuous license usage monitoring: Don’t treat license management as a one-time event (either annually or at contract renewal). Implement tools and processes to track SAP usage on an ongoing basis. This could involve setting up internal dashboards that display the number of active users, the modules being utilized, and how this compares to your entitlements. Monitoring in real-time or at least monthly will alert you to any creeping underutilization or areas where you might be approaching license limits. By having visibility into usage trends, you can take corrective action (such as reallocating licenses or training users on underutilized modules) and ensure you’re not paying for capacity you don’t need. It also prepares you with data for the next negotiation cycle – you’ll know exactly what is used and what isn’t.
  • Conduct regular consumption reviews (quarterly or biannually): At least once or twice a year, conduct a deep-dive review of your SAP consumption versus contract terms. This is essentially an internal audit for the benefit of your team. Check if the number of users in each license tier still makes sense, verify if any new integrations might trigger indirect usage considerations, and determine if business changes (such as a divestiture or acquisition) have altered your needs. Regular reviews help identify issues early – for example, if one department stopped using a certain SAP module last quarter, you may consider removing those licenses in the next renewal or repurposing them elsewhere. This practice also positions you to negotiate from facts rather than assumptions in the future. Essentially, you’re continuously realigning your spend with actual value received.
  • Establish a renewal negotiation calendar and strategy refresh: Don’t let SAP renewals catch you off guard. Governance includes planning for negotiations. Mark critical dates such as renewal notice periods (many contracts require you to notify SAP 60-90 days before renewal if you intend to make changes). Well in advance of those dates, start updating your negotiation strategy: refresh your benchmarks (prices may have shifted since last time), revisit which new products or services you might want, and evaluate if any new competitors or market changes could give you leverage. By treating negotiation as a recurring process – something you prepare for at least annually – you maintain leverage continuously. Some enterprises even create a playbook that gets updated annually, so when the next major SAP discussion is on the horizon, they are not scrambling. Long-term savings are maximized when you approach your SAP relationship proactively, not just when a contract is about to expire.

By instituting these governance practices, organizations can ensure they sustain the savings achieved and continue to optimize their SAP environment.

It turns one-time negotiation wins into ongoing discipline that keeps costs in check.

In the dynamic world of enterprise software (where usage, needs, and offerings evolve constantly), an active management approach is the only way to avoid cost creep and be ready to seize new savings opportunities.

Future Trends & Outlook

The landscape of enterprise software negotiation is not static. It’s important to anticipate future trends in SAP’s pricing and customer behavior to stay ahead of the game.

Here are a few emerging trends and what they could mean for your SAP negotiation strategy in the future:

  • Shift toward consumption-based and outcome-based pricing: The traditional model of purchasing a large number of SAP licenses or a single, upfront subscription is slowly evolving. SAP and other enterprise vendors are exploring more consumption-based models, where fees are tied to actual usage levels or business outcomes. For example, we might see models where, instead of flat named-user counts, pricing could flex based on transactions processed or system resources used. Outcome-based pricing (paying for results delivered rather than software itself) could also surface in specific scenarios. This trend means negotiators will need to focus not just on unit price, but on metrics and measurement – ensuring any consumption-based deal has transparent metrics, reasonable unit rates, and caps to prevent cost overruns. Staying informed on SAP’s licensing model shifts (such as recent moves to cloud credits or usage-based services) will be crucial.
  • SAP’s increased bundling of cloud “digital core” services: SAP is incentivizing customers to move to its integrated cloud offerings (for instance, RISE with SAP, which bundles S/4HANA Cloud with infrastructure, tools, and services in one package). We expect SAP to continue bundling services into all-in-one solutions. On one hand, these bundles can provide better value and simplicity – a one-stop shop for your ERP and related needs. On the other hand, bundles can make it more difficult to see the cost of individual components and to negotiate separate pieces. The trend toward bundled cloud contracts means customers should be prepared to negotiate the bundle’s components: ensure you’re not paying for bundled elements you won’t use, and push for flexibility to swap components if needed. Also, with everything under one agreement, pay extra attention to the contract terms (like performance SLAs and exit clauses) since so much is tied together. The future likely holds more “mega-deals” for SAP cloud, so mastering bundle negotiation will be important.
  • Savvier customers with better competitive intelligence: As the enterprise software buyer community becomes more connected and informed, customers are coming to the table with greater sophistication. There’s a growing ecosystem of advisors, user groups, and online resources sharing anonymized deal data and negotiation experiences. This means you’re not negotiating in the dark – and SAP knows it. In the future, expect SAP sales tactics to adjust because they will face customers who have done their homework. You might see SAP preemptively offering more transparent pricing or flexible terms to well-prepared clients (to avoid protracted haggling). Alternatively, SAP might push harder on value justification if they know you’ll benchmark their price. The takeaway: continue to leverage the increasing availability of competitive intelligence. A rising tide of knowledge tilts the balance of leverage towards the customer. In the coming years, those who utilize data and expert insights will have a distinct edge in negotiations against even the largest vendors.

In summary, the future of SAP negotiations will be influenced by new pricing models, bundled offerings, and a more informed customer base. By staying aware of these trends, you can adapt your negotiation strategies to whatever SAP throws your way.

The core principles won’t change – leverage, preparation, and strategic thinking – but the context will.

Keep learning, stay skeptical of vendor moves, and adapt to new tactics as the landscape evolves; you’ll continue to find ways to drive down costs and secure fair deals.

Read about our SAP Contract Negotiation Service.

SAP Negotiations Explained – ECC, S 4HANA, RISE with SAP, Support & Third Party Options

Do you want to know more about our SAP Negotiation Services?

Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is a seasoned IT leader and recognized expert in enterprise software licensing and negotiation. With over 15 years of experience in SAP licensing, he has held senior roles at IBM, Oracle, and SAP. Fredrik brings deep expertise in optimizing complex licensing agreements, cost reduction, and vendor negotiations for global enterprises navigating digital transformation.

    View all posts