SAP Partner Licensing Models: An Enterprise CIO/CTO Guide

SAP Partner Licensing Models

SAP’s software licensing is notoriously complex, with multiple models and metrics that can bewilder even seasoned IT leaders.

CIOs and CTOs require a comprehensive understanding of SAP partner licensing models – ranging from direct licensing to partner-led options – to optimize costs, mitigate risk, and negotiate favorable contracts.

This guide provides an overview of how SAP partners engage in licensing (reselling, managed cloud, OEM), highlights real-world pricing examples, and offers strategic advice for enterprise decision-makers.

SAP Licensing Complexity and the Role of Partners

SAP’s product portfolio spans ERP, analytics, HR, and more, each with its own license types (user-based, module-based, and consumption-based) and associated rules.

Traditional SAP licensing involved perpetual licenses (a big upfront fee plus ~22% annual maintenance) and a complex system of named user categories and engine metrics.

Today, SAP also offers subscription models (e.g., cloud services and RISE with SAP) with pay-as-you-go pricing. These changes add flexibility but can increase complexity and cost if not managed well.

Why involve SAP partners? SAP’s global partner ecosystem (systems integrators, resellers, managed service providers, etc.) plays a crucial role in helping customers navigate this complexity.

Partners can resell SAP licenses, offer cloud hosting and managed services, or even embed SAP technology in their solutions.

Engaging the right partner can unlock discounts, provide bundled offerings, and bring specialized licensing expertise to ensure you’re not overpaying or under-licensed.

In essence, partners act as translators and negotiators in the SAP licensing world, aligning SAP’s models to your business needs.

Read SAP Licensing for Multinational Companies.

Direct vs. Partner Licensing: What’s the Difference?

When acquiring SAP software, enterprises can either license directly from SAP or go through an authorized SAP partner.

In a direct deal, you negotiate with SAP itself for your contract – this gives direct relationship and support, but pricing flexibility depends on SAP’s sales incentives.

Partner-mediated licensing, on the other hand, introduces a third party who can add value:

• Pricing and Discounts: Partners often receive wholesale discounts from SAP and may pass a portion of those savings to the customer. For example, a reseller might get 30–40% off SAP’s list price; the end customer could see a ~5–15% discount off the list after the partner’s margin. In large deals, partners can competitively “quote” against SAP’s direct pricing, driving better discounts.
• Bundled Services: Partners frequently bundle software licenses with implementation, support, and even infrastructure. This one-stop approach (often marketed as “one handshake, one contract”) can simplify your vendor management. For instance, instead of buying software from SAP and hosting it in the cloud elsewhere, a partner may offer a combined package with a single bill.
• Contract Structure: In direct deals, you sign SAP’s standard licensing agreement. Through a partner, you might sign a contract with the partner (who, in turn, has an agreement with SAP), especially in cloud or managed services scenarios. This can streamline things but also means less direct control over the relationship with SAP – an important consideration for compliance and audit clauses.
• Support and Advocacy: A good SAP partner can advocate on your behalf, advising on license types you truly need and helping defend against audits or shelfware (unused licenses). They often have licensing specialists who interpret SAP’s policies and ensure your entitlements match usage.

In short, direct licensing suits organizations wanting a close engagement with SAP, whereas partner licensing can offer flexibility and potential cost benefits – provided you choose a trustworthy partner and structure the deal carefully.

Read the Benefits of SAP License Management.

Value-Added Reseller (VAR) Licensing Model

Many CIOs first encounter partner licensing via value-added resellers.

In SAP’s PartnerEdge program, this is the “Sell” model, where a partner is authorized to sell SAP software licenses (on-premises or cloud subscriptions) to end customers.

Key points about the VAR model:

• How it Works: The partner typically helps scope the SAP products and user licenses you need, then provides a quote. The sale may be transacted directly between you and SAP (with the partner acting as the facilitator), or the partner may purchase from SAP and resell it to you. Either way, SAP recognizes the partner in the deal (often giving them a margin or commission).
• Discounts and Value-Add: Resellers differentiate themselves by offering licensing expertise and sometimes better pricing. They might bundle additional services (such as implementation, training, and support) at a reduced rate to sweeten the deal. For example, a reseller might include 100 hours of free consulting or offer a slightly bigger discount if you sign a services contract with them.
• Contract and Support: In a reseller scenario, you usually still end up with an SAP license agreement (ensuring you’re a valid SAP customer for support). However, the partner may handle first-line support or act as your liaison with SAP. Some VARs also offer financing options or payment plans for license fees, which can be beneficial for managing cash flow.
• Real-World Example: Imagine a multinational firm needing 500 SAP S/4HANA user licenses. SAP’s list price for a Professional user might be around $4,000 (one-time) each. Instead of paying the ~$2M list price, the firm engages two SAP resellers to bid. One partner offers a 20% discount, plus a fixed-price implementation package, saving the firm hundreds of thousands of dollars upfront. The partner’s knowledge also helps the firm choose the right mix of license types (e.g., less expensive Professional licenses, lower-cost Functional user licenses), avoiding over-purchasing.

Pros: Reseller partners can obtain competitive pricing, offer convenience by packaging services, and guide you through SAP’s product choices.

Cons: The ultimate license terms are still SAP’s – complexity remains. Also, a mediocre reseller might push products for commission, so ensure your partner is truly aligned with your interests.

Partner Managed Cloud (Run) Licensing Model

The Partner Managed Cloud model (part of PartnerEdge “Run” engagement) allows partners to deliver SAP software as a service under a subscription model.

Here, the partner essentially becomes your SAP cloud provider. Instead of purchasing licenses outright, you subscribe to a solution that the partner hosts and manages.

• How it Works: The partner signs a PMC agreement with SAP, enabling them to “lease” SAP software licenses every month. The partner provides the infrastructure (often on AWS, Azure, or their data center), the SAP software, and typically offers ongoing support services. You sign a subscription contract with the partner for a bundled fee (covering the software, hosting, maintenance, and management).
• One Fee, All-Inclusive: This model is attractive to CIOs who want a single point of contact. You get predictable periodic costs instead of a large upfront license purchase. For instance, rather than paying $1 million upfront for licenses, hardware, and maintenance, you might pay, say, $30,000 per month to a partner who handles everything in their private cloud.
• Flexibility: Partner-managed cloud can be more flexible in scaling users up or down. Since the partner is leasing licenses from SAP, they might allow you to adjust your subscription counts annually or even quarterly. Also, if you already own some SAP licenses, some partners can accommodate a bring-your-own-license (BYOL) into their cloud, crediting your existing investment.
• Compared to SAP’s RISE offering, “RISE with SAP” is also a subscription model that bundles software, infrastructure, and support in one contract. The difference is RISE is sold by SAP directly (though implemented by partners), whereas a partner-managed cloud is sold and run by the partner. Cost-wise, RISE often offers competitive introductory pricing (reports indicate it can be cheaper than traditional licensing in the first three years). Still, over a longer horizon (5–10 years), RISE costs may equal or exceed on-premise costs. Partners sometimes use this to pitch their managed cloud as having more stable or lower long-term costs, customized service, and the ability to integrate non-SAP systems in the same managed environment. Some large SIs and MSPs now offer “RISE with Partner” arrangements, which involve reselling RISE subscriptions while still providing surrounding services under a single agreement.
• Real-World Example: A mid-sized manufacturer with 200 SAP users chose a partner-managed cloud instead of traditional licensing. The partner charged approximately $150 per user per month, which included the latest S/4HANA software, cloud hosting, maintenance, and basic support. This came out to $ 30,000 per month. Over three years ($1.08M total), this was slightly less than the cost of purchasing 200 perpetual licenses, plus 3 years of maintenance and cloud infrastructure, separately. The CIO valued the faster deployment and avoidance of heavy upfront spending. However, the contract ensured that if the partnership ended, the company could optionally purchase the licenses outright to continue running SAP – a critical safeguard to avoid lock-in.

Example: SAP Business One partner cloud subscription pricing versus on-premises perpetual license costs (in the SME context). Partners often offer both models: perpetual licenses (one-time cost, plus maintenance) and hosted subscriptions (monthly per-user fees). This chart displays U.S. pricing for SAP Business One through partners, including cloud Multi-Tenant and Single-Tenant options, as well as comparable user license fees.

OEM and “Build” Partner Licensing Model

Another avenue is SAP’s OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) licensing, part of the PartnerEdge “Build” model.

In this scenario, an independent software vendor or solution provider embeds SAP technology into their own product or service:

• How it Works: The partner might use SAP’s platform (for example, SAP Database or SAP Analytics engine) as part of a larger solution they develop. The end customer typically doesn’t have a separate SAP contract; instead, the partner’s solution agreement covers the right to use the embedded SAP components. The partner pays SAP royalties or license fees behind the scenes based on usage.
• Use Cases: OEM deals are common for industry-specific solutions. For instance, a healthcare software provider might include an SAP database and some ERP modules as part of their hospital management system. The hospital purchases the all-in-one solution from its partner. This model is also evident in cloud SaaS extensions. For example, SuccessFactors (an SAP cloud HR product) has an ecosystem where partners build add-ons hosted on SAP’s platform and license them to customers.
• Pricing: OEM pricing is often usage or subscription-based, negotiated between SAP and the partner. Customers see a unified bill from the partner. One advantage is that customers can receive a highly tailored pricing metric that aligns with their business (e.g., a “per hospital bed per month” fee, including the SAP components, rather than generic SAP user licenses).
• Pros & Cons: For CIOs, OEM licensing can simplify your life – you’re effectively dealing with one vendor for a composite solution. It can sometimes be cheaper than licensing equivalent SAP modules directly (because the OEM partner might get volume discounts or special pricing). On the flip side, you are dependent on that partner for support and future upgrades. If the partner’s product lags behind SAP’s latest version or if the partner relationship sours, you could be stuck. Also, if you want to expand usage beyond the OEM solution’s scope, you may still need to acquire standard SAP licenses later.
• Example: Think of a scenario where an equipment manufacturing company uses a niche Manufacturing Execution System (MES) provided by a partner, which, under the hood, runs on SAP technology. The CIO pays the partner an annual fee based on the number of production lines in operation. This fee covers everything – the MES application, the embedded SAP database, and runtime licenses. The company benefits from SAP’s robustness without a direct SAP contract, but it must rely on the partner for any SAP-related licensing compliance.

Pricing and Contract Considerations

SAP licensing discussions inevitably come down to dollars and terms. It’s essential to compare how costs accrue under different models and to scrutinize contract details.

Below is a simplified comparison of licensing models and their characteristics:

Negotiation and Cost Tips:

• Understand Your License Baseline: Conduct a thorough assessment of the SAP licenses you currently own versus those you use. This prevents unnecessary purchases. Partners can assist with usage audits to identify shelfware (unused licenses) that could be eliminated or repurposed.
• Leverage Timing and Sales Quotas: SAP (and partners) have quarter-end and year-end targets. Significant discounts (even 30-50% off) can sometimes be achieved if your deal helps them hit a quota. Be mindful of SAP’s fiscal year timing (which often ends in December) – larger incentives may be available then.
• Compare Multiple Options: Don’t assume SAP’s first quote is the best. Get a direct quote and at least one partner quote. If relevant, compare RISE vs partner-managed cloud offers. Each will bundle costs differently (one may include more services or different contract lengths), so do an apples-to-apples TCO analysis. For instance, a 5-year TCO comparison might reveal that while a subscription appears pricier in the long run, it saves on internal IT costs and provides greater flexibility.
• Contract Flexibility: In any model, negotiate flexibility into the contract. Examples include the ability to swap license types as needs change (e.g., converting some Professional users to Limited if roles change), rights to transfer to new technologies (such as converting old ECC licenses to S/4HANA at favorable terms), and clear provisions for adding or removing users annually. In partner contracts, also include an exit plan – e.g., if the service ends, can you port the solution to another host or convert it to direct SAP licenses?
• Audit and Compliance Protections: Ensure the contract specifies how license compliance will be monitored and who is responsible for audit fees. SAP’s audits can be rigorous; if you’re in a partner-managed scenario, clarify how audit requests will be handled. Some partners offer audit defense guarantees or will pay certain penalties if they mismanage license allocations – these can be valuable safeguards.
• Real-World Pricing Benchmarks: Stay informed on typical SAP pricing. For instance, knowing that a Professional user license for SAP S/4HANA typically costs around $ 4,000 helps you gauge discount levels in quotes. Likewise, being aware that SAP Business One (an SME solution) can be had for ~$140–$185 per user per month in the cloud (as shown above) provides context for pricing smaller SAP deployments. If a quote seems significantly higher than expected, push back with benchmarks or engage a licensing expert to validate it.

Risks and Compliance Considerations

Navigating SAP licenses with partners doesn’t remove all risk – it changes it.

CIOs must remain vigilant about compliance and contract risk in any model:

• Indirect Access/Digital Access: A perennial SAP gotcha is licensing “indirect” usage – when non-SAP systems or external users interact with SAP data. SAP now offers a Digital Access document-based model. Still, you must ensure that any partner solution (such as an e-commerce platform or CRM that integrates with SAP) is properly licensed. If you’re using a partner’s integrated solution, clarify if their license covers indirect use or if you need extra licenses. High-profile cases have resulted in companies being hit with multimillion-dollar fees for unknowingly violating these rules.
• Audit Surprise: Even in partner-led scenarios, SAP typically reserves the right to audit end customers. If you’re transacting directly with SAP (either through the direct or VAR model), expect to undergo an annual or bi-annual audit. In a cloud subscription (RISE or partner cloud), usage is continuously monitored, but audits can still occur for any on-premises licenses. To mitigate risk, conduct internal license audits annually with your partner’s assistance. Reassign or retire unused licenses proactively and ensure every user has the correct license type assigned (SAP’s audit tooling will flag any user without a license type as a full Professional by default – potentially inflating compliance gaps).
• True-Up and Shelfware: Under perpetual licensing, if you exceed your entitlements, you’ll face a “true-up” bill at renewal or audit time. Partners can sometimes negotiate better true-up rates or offer license subscription pools that adjust according to usage. However, it’s up to you to monitor usage metrics (such as users and transactions). On the other hand, shelfware (excess licenses purchased but not utilized) represents a wasted budget. Structure deals (especially via partners) that allow you to phase purchases or adjust counts periodically. For example, avoid buying 1,000 users upfront if you only have 600 active today. See if you can contract for 600 now and have pre-negotiated pricing for future additions, or use a cloud model that grows with you.
• Lock-In and Exit Strategy: Relying on a single partner for SAP can create operational dependency. What if service quality dips or you want to bring operations back in-house? Ensure your contracts have an exit strategy. For a partner-managed cloud, consider negotiating clauses such as data portability, assistance with transition, and the option to purchase licenses (or migrate to SAP’s SaaS) if the contract is terminated. Also, watch out for auto-renewal clauses or steep renewal price hikes after an initial term – negotiate caps on renewal increases or at least advance notice to renegotiate.
• Data Security and Compliance: If a partner is hosting your SAP environment, due diligence on their security and compliance posture is critical. SAP systems often house sensitive financial, HR, and supply chain data. Confirm that the partner meets relevant standards (ISO 27001, SOC 2, etc.) and that your data protection requirements (GDPR, industry regulations) are contractually addressed. This isn’t directly a licensing issue, but it’s an important risk area when handing keys to a third party in a managed model.
• Continuous Changes in SAP Licensing: SAP frequently updates its licensing policies (e.g., new user definitions, changes in digital access pricing, bundling of products). Gartner and SAP licensing advisory firms report that license definitions can change annually. Build a clause in contracts that protects you against materially adverse licensing changes. For instance, if SAP redefines a product or metric that you’ve licensed through a partner, your costs or usage rights shouldn’t suddenly change for the worse during your contract term.

By keeping these considerations in mind and working closely with both SAP and knowledgeable partners, CIOs can turn licensing from a minefield into a manageable strategic asset – optimizing costs while staying fully compliant.

Recommendations

To maximize value and minimize headaches in SAP licensing, CIOs and CTOs should:

• Benchmark and plan ahead: Begin any SAP initiative by creating a detailed inventory of needs and license types. Benchmark pricing from multiple sources (SAP direct and partners) to have a target in negotiations.
• Choose the right partner model: Align the partner engagement model with your strategy. For pure cost savings on a stable on-prem system, a VAR reseller might suffice. For a rapid cloud move or a lack of internal IT resources, consider a partner-managed cloud solution. Ensure the partner has expertise in SAP licensing and a proven track record in your industry.
• Negotiate contract safeguards: Don’t just negotiate on price – negotiate terms. Insist on flexibility to swap license types or adjust volumes, include clear responsibilities for compliance and audit support, and avoid lock-in by securing exit options and data ownership clarity.
• Conduct regular license reviews: Set up governance (perhaps quarterly reviews with the partner or an independent auditor) to track SAP license usage vs entitlements. This proactive approach identifies compliance issues or unused licenses early, allowing you to reallocate or renegotiate them before they become an expensive problem.
• Leverage SAP’s transitions: SAP wants customers on newer products (S/4HANA, cloud services). Use this to your advantage – for instance, negotiate a conversion credit for legacy licenses when moving to S/4HANA or RISE. Partners can often help obtain these incentives.
• Consider total business value: When evaluating costs, factor in the broader impact. A partner-managed service might have a higher sticker price than doing it yourself. Still, if it accelerates time-to-value, reduces the need for hiring SAP basis staff, or improves uptime, those benefits translate to business value. Present a holistic business case to the CFO, not just a license fee comparison.
• Stay educated and get expert help: SAP licensing is not a “set and forget” domain. Encourage your team to stay updated via SAP user groups or licensing webinars. When in doubt, hire an independent SAP licensing advisor to validate partner proposals or to support major contract negotiations – their fee can pay for itself many times over in savings.
• Foster a tripartite relationship: Ideally, build a transparent relationship between you, your SAP partner, and SAP itself. While partners can shield you from some complexity, it’s wise to maintain some direct communication with SAP (e.g., via your SAP account manager or at least through the SAP user group community) to stay informed on changes and ensure the vendor hears your interests.
• Pilot new models on a small scale: If you’re unsure about, say, moving to a subscription cloud model, pilot it with a non-mission-critical SAP workload or a subset of users. Learn the cost behavior and performance in a controlled way before committing enterprise-wide. Partners often accommodate a phased approach, such as running a smaller divisional system in their cloud as a proof of concept.
• Document everything: Keep detailed records of your entitlements, contract terms, and all communications regarding the interpretation of licensing. If personnel change (on your side or the partner’s), having a clear archive of what was agreed upon (especially any special terms or SAP assurances) is invaluable for avoiding disputes later.

FAQ

Q1: What are the main SAP partner licensing models I should know about?
A1: The three key partner licensing models are: Reseller (VAR) – where a partner sells you SAP licenses, often bundled with services or at a discount; Partner Managed Cloud (PMC) – where a partner hosts and manages SAP software for you on a subscription basis (essentially SAP as-a-service under the partner’s contract); and OEM/Build – where SAP software or technology is embedded in a partner’s own solution that you purchase. Each model has different cost structures and is suited to different needs (resale for traditional ownership, managed cloud for outsourcing, OEM for specialized third-party solutions).

Q2: How can working with a partner save us money on SAP licenses?
A2: Partners can drive savings in a few ways. They often receive discounts from SAP and can pass some of these savings on to you (e.g., offering a 10–20% lower price than SAP’s direct quote). They also add value by optimizing what you buy – a good partner will analyze your user roles and system usage to recommend the most cost-effective license types, preventing over-licensing. In managed cloud scenarios, partners bundle infrastructure and support, which can lower your total cost of ownership compared to sourcing these services separately. Partners can help time your purchase to maximize incentives (like SAP’s promotional programs or quarter-end discounts), further reducing costs.

Q3: What’s the difference between SAP’s RISE offering and a partner-managed cloud?
A3: RISE with SAP is SAP’s own all-in-one cloud subscription for S/4HANA and related services – you contract directly with SAP for software, hosting (on a hyperscaler), and support in one package. A partner-managed cloud is similar in concept (one subscription for everything) but provided by an SAP partner. In a partner cloud, the partner may use their private cloud or a hyperscaler account they manage, and they hold the contract with you. RISE can be appealing for its simplicity and initial pricing, but it still requires a partner for implementation and doesn’t cover non-SAP systems. A partner-managed cloud might offer more flexibility (custom services, mixing SAP and non-SAP in one environment) and potentially a more personalized support experience. The best choice depends on your priorities: if you want SAP to take primary responsibility, RISE is an option; if you prefer one of your trusted partners to run the show (and possibly include additional services), then partner-managed is an attractive option. Some large partners also resell RISE, offering a hybrid of both.

Q4: How do I ensure license compliance when using a partner for SAP?
A4: License compliance ultimately remains your responsibility; however, partners can provide assistance. First, ensure that your contract with the partner clearly outlines how licenses are allocated and managed, and that you have visibility into usage (e.g., regular license usage reports). Work with partners who offer audit support services – they should help prepare you for SAP audits and even defend any findings. Regularly review user lists and usage metrics with the partner to catch any discrepancies. It’s also wise to maintain a direct understanding of SAP’s licensing rules (through training or advisors) so you can double-check the partner’s recommendations. If the partner is offering an “all-you-can-eat” style deal (e.g., unlimited usage within certain bounds), obtain that in writing to avoid any surprises. In short, treat a partner-managed environment with the same rigor as your own: governance, monitoring, and periodic true-up checks.

Q5: When should we buy SAP licenses directly from SAP versus through a partner?
A5: If you are executing a straightforward upgrade or expansion of an existing SAP environment and have a good relationship with SAP’s sales team, going directly might be efficient (especially if you’re a large enterprise that can negotiate volume discounts on your own). However, mid-sized organizations or those undertaking a new SAP implementation often benefit from a partner’s involvement – the partner can package the deal and potentially offer better pricing or value-added extras. Also, if you lack internal SAP licensing expertise, a partner can ensure you buy the right things (avoiding costly mistakes). In scenarios where you need a turnkey solution (such as quickly moving to the cloud or obtaining a specific industry solution), a partner is usually the best approach. On the other hand, if you want to maintain full control, have licensing expertise in-house, and perhaps want to multi-source services (e.g., use one vendor for hosting and another for support), then buying directly and assembling your own ecosystem might suit you. Many enterprises do both: buy core strategic licenses directly from SAP, but use partners for niche add-ons or for certain geographies where a local partner can provide a better deal.

Read more about our SAP Licensing Services.

Schedule a meeting with us to discuss our SAP Advisory Services.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit