SAP Negotiation Mistakes To Avoid

SAP Negotiation Mistakes Across To Avoid

Negotiating SAP contracts is complex, and common mistakes can cost enterprises millions.

This advisory article highlights the most frequent SAP negotiation pitfalls across on-premises and cloud products (including RISE with SAP) and guides to avoid these errors.

The key takeaway: prepare thoroughly, challenge everything in the SAP contract, and prioritize flexibility and cost containment to prevent long-term vendor lock-in.

Preparing for an SAP renewal, RISE with SAP proposal, or S/4HANA deal?
This free white paper reveals 10 proven strategies to:

– Reduce costs
– Avoid vendor lock-in
– Strengthen your negotiation position

Designed for CIOs and procurement leaders. Download now and take back control.

SAP Licensing Complexity and Planning Failures

Many organizations underestimate SAP’s licensing complexity and walk into negotiations unprepared. Mistake: failing to analyze current usage and license needs in detail.

SAP offers a maze of user types, engine metrics, and new models (e.g., Digital Access document counts), which change over time.

Failing to stay updated on SAP’s latest licensing rules or not gathering accurate internal usage data can lead to overbuying or compliance risks.

For example, a company that doesn’t track actual user activity may purchase far more Professional User licenses than needed, or miss cheaper license types for casual users.

Common planning pitfalls include:

• Not understanding license metrics: Companies that ignore how SAP measures use (users, revenue, documents, etc.) often agree to terms they can’t fully comply with or that inflate costs.
• Inadequate internal alignment: Without early stakeholder alignment (IT, procurement, finance), SAP can exploit internal confusion. Negotiation teams must be unified on requirements and walk-away points.
• Rushed, last-minute negotiations: Starting talks only weeks before renewal is too late. A lack of 6–12 month planning time results in poor leverage and hasty decisions under SAP’s pressure.

Read SAP Negotiation Renewal Strategies for Cloud Contracts.

SAP Cloud Licensing & RISE with SAP Pitfalls

Moving to cloud subscriptions (SAP SaaS products or RISE with SAP bundle) introduces new negotiation challenges. A common mistake is assuming the cloud model is just “the same as on-premise, but hosted.”

In reality, SAP Cloud contracts fundamentally differ in ownership, flexibility, and included services. Misunderstanding these nuances leads to costly surprises.

For instance, some executives sign a RISE with SAP deal expecting SAP to handle everything, only to later find implementation and certain support aspects were not included.

To illustrate key differences:

Where negotiations go wrong: Customers who don’t educate their teams on these differences may accept SAP’s cloud contract “as is.”

One pitfall is not clarifying scope – e.g., assuming disaster recovery, extra non-production systems, or specific SLAs are included in RISE when they’re not.

Always scrutinize cloud contracts for what is and isn’t included, and negotiate to add missing elements or adjust pricing.

Another mistake is neglecting the long-term cost: subscription pricing can rise at renewal.

Without price protections, an attractive initial cloud discount can turn into a high-cost lock-in later. Always negotiate caps on annual price increases and define renewal terms up front.

Read SAP S/4HANA Negotiations.

Overlooking Indirect Access and Compliance Risks

A major compliance pitfall in SAP licensing is indirect access, when non-SAP systems or external users interact with SAP data. Hefty fees or audit findings have blindsided many companies because they ignored this area.

Mistake: failing to account for all third-party integrations and indirect usage in your SAP environment. For example, suppose your e-commerce platform or CRM pulls data from SAP. In that case, SAP may require additional licenses (either under old named-user rules or the newer Digital Access model charging per document).

One well-known case saw an SAP customer file a multi-million-dollar claim due to unlicensed indirect use.

To avoid this, address indirect access head-on during negotiations:

• Map all integrations: Document every system that interfaces with SAP. Don’t rely on SAP to overlook them – they won’t.
• Negotiate clear terms: If adopting SAP’s Digital Access license, ensure the contract defines how documents are counted and consider a cap or discounted bundle for indirect documents. Alternatively, negotiate clauses that give you a chance to license additional use before penalties.
• Compliance-friendly terms: Push for language that limits audit frequency (e.g., no more than once per year with notice) and a cooperative resolution process. While SAP won’t remove audit rights, some flexibility can prevent constant audit disruption.

Ignoring indirect usage is a costly mistake – proactive compliance management is essential for cost containment and avoiding surprises in SAP audits.

Over-Licensing, Shelfware, and Missed Cost Containment

SAP’s product scope is vast, and sales reps often encourage buying extra to “future-proof.” The result can be shelfware – licenses or subscriptions that you pay for but never fully use.

One global enterprise might be paying maintenance on a shelf of unused SAP engine licenses or thousands of infrequently used user licenses, draining the budget with no value in return.

Mistake: focusing on the upfront discount percentage rather than aligning licenses to actual needs. A 70% discount on unnecessary licenses is still money wasted.

Key overspending traps include:

• No license optimization: Failing to audit and re-harvest licenses regularly. Many companies assign expensive Professional licenses to users who barely use SAP, instead of downgrading them to a cheaper license type. Regular internal reviews can identify these opportunities to save.
• Overestimating growth: Over-committing to user counts or modules “just in case.” It’s safer to start smaller with an option to grow at locked-in discounts. Negotiate the right to true-up at the same discount or add users later, rather than overbuying Day 1.
• Ignoring maintenance math: SAP’s annual support is ~20–22% of the license list price. If you negotiate a deep discount but allow SAP to peg maintenance on the undiscounted list price, you effectively pay a higher percentage of your actual cost every year. This is a common hidden cost. Always ensure maintenance fees are based on what you actually pay, and negotiate caps on maintenance increases (e.g. no more than 3% per year). In recent years SAP has raised support fees (3-5% hikes due to “inflation”), so securing a cap or freeze for a few years is critical for cost containment.

Enterprises that don’t actively manage their license portfolio end up over-licensed and overspending. The antidote is continuous license optimization and contractual safeguards to eliminate waste.

Accepting Standard SAP Contracts Without Negotiation

SAP’s standard contract terms are written in SAP’s favor, and they are absolutely negotiable. A big mistake is to accept the first contract draft without pushing back on critical terms.

This happens often when companies focus only on pricing and neglect the fine print. Examples of boilerplate terms that create risk:

• Rigid usage definitions: Standard terms might restrict re-allocating licenses across affiliates or impose strict named-user definitions. Not negotiating flexibility here can hurt if your organizational structure changes or users shift.
• One-sided liabilities and warranties: SAP’s contract may limit its liability extensively while offering minimal warranties to you. Important protections (for data security, performance, etc.) could be missing. Many buyers fail to negotiate stronger SLAs or remedies if SAP’s cloud service underperforms.
• Audit clause and termination: SAP contracts typically allow for audit at any time. You should negotiate practical limits (reasonable notice, frequency limits) and also clarify termination rights. In cloud deals, not carefully reviewing auto-renewal and termination penalties is a mistake that can lock you into an unwanted extension.

The bottom line: Every clause is on the table. Do not let SAP or your own team say “we can’t change that.” Experienced negotiators and SAM advisors routinely help modify contracts to better balance responsibilities and reduce ambiguity.

For instance, savvy customers negotiate custom terms like allowing a period to remedy license shortfalls before SAP can terminate for breach.

Failing to tailor the contract leaves your organization exposed to future risks and costs that could have been avoided with a firm stance during negotiation.

Lack of Flexibility and Vendor Lock-In Concerns

Another broad mistake is not planning for the future, both in terms of growth and exit strategy. SAP agreements, especially long-term cloud subscriptions, can create vendor lock-in if you’re not careful.

Common errors in this arena:

• No scalability built-in: Business needs change, but many SAP contracts don’t allow adjusting the number of subscriptions or modules mid-term. If you merge or divest a division, or a project is delayed, you might be stuck overpaying for unused licenses. Negotiating a mid-term adjustment clause (for example, the ability to reduce subscriptions by 10% after a year) is often overlooked but can save money if circumstances change.
• Ignoring future roadmaps: Not aligning the contract with your IT roadmap can backfire. For example, if you plan to roll out SAP S/4HANA in phases globally, you should negotiate global pricing and deployment flexibility. If you sign a regional contract without global terms, you might pay more when expanding SAP to new geographies later. Ensure the contract supports expansions, new cloud services, or migrations you anticipate in the coming years (e.g., a clause to incorporate additional SAP cloud products at pre-agreed discount rates).
• No exit strategy: Perhaps the most dangerous mistake is not considering what happens at contract end or if you need to leave. In on-prem licensing, you at least own the software (you could drop maintenance and keep using it, or switch to third-party support). But in cloud deals, if you don’t renew, you lose access. Companies that don’t plan for this become captive to SAP. To mitigate lock-in, negotiate things like data export rights and assistance at the end of the term, and evaluate alternatives periodically. Even if you fully intend to stay with SAP, having an alternative option (or at least the credible threat of one) is key to keeping SAP’s pricing honest at renewal time.

Ultimately, enterprise buyers must ensure the SAP contract is not a static document but a living framework that can adapt.

Failure to build in flexibility – whether it’s pricing protections, ability to swap licenses (e.g., exchange unused products for new ones), or clear exit provisions – will severely limit your leverage and agility down the road.

Don’t let short-term thinking lock your company into an inflexible agreement for a decade.

Recommendations

To avoid these SAP negotiation mistakes, enterprise IT and sourcing leaders should take the following actions:

• Start early with a cross-functional team: Begin planning 6–12 months before renewal. Involve IT, procurement, finance, and legal to define needs and strategy. Early preparation prevents last-minute concessions.
• Audit and right-size your licenses: Use SAP’s measurement tools (USMM/LAW) or third-party analytics to understand actual usage. Identify unused or underused licenses to remove or downgrade before you negotiate new purchases.
• Educate yourself on SAP’s models: Stay current on SAP licensing policies (e.g., Digital Access, RISE bundling, new cloud services). Know the difference between on-prem and cloud terms so you won’t accept unfavorable cloud conditions out of ignorance.
• Negotiate everything – not just price: Push back on contract terms: cap maintenance increases, include price locks for future expansions, tighten audit rights, and ensure SLAs meet your requirements. Nothing in SAP’s contract is sacred if it doesn’t work for you.
• Leverage market alternatives: Use quotes from SAP’s competitors (Oracle, Microsoft, etc.) or the option of third-party support as bargaining chips. Demonstrating that you have other options is one of the strongest negotiation tools to obtain discounts and concessions.
• Align contracts with the business roadmap: If you expect growth, global expansion, or new SAP modules, incorporate these into the deal. Negotiate scalable terms (e.g., volume discounts for future purchases, coterminous end dates) so the contract supports your strategy rather than constrains it.
• Plan an exit and renewal strategy: Don’t assume you’ll simply renew on SAP’s terms. Define early on how you would transition away if needed – even if it’s a worst-case scenario. This mindset ensures you negotiate provisions for data extraction, transition assistance, or at least avoid onerous auto-renewal traps.
• Seek expert help and benchmarks: Engage independent licensing experts or use industry benchmark data for SAP deals. Knowing typical discount ranges, pricing, and terms that others have achieved globally will strengthen your position and help you spot unreasonable terms.

By following these recommendations, organizations can significantly improve their SAP contract outcomes, containing costs, reducing risk, and retaining flexibility for the future.

FAQ

Q1: What is the best way to avoid overpaying for SAP licenses?
A1: The key is license optimization before and after a deal. Before negotiating, conduct an internal audit of usage to ensure you only purchase what you actually need. Eliminate or reassign any shelfware (unused licenses) instead of blindly renewing them. During negotiations, start with a smaller needed quantity and negotiate the right to buy more later at the same discount. After signing, continually monitor license utilization. Adjust or retire unused licenses and leverage SAP’s license exchange programs to swap unused products for those you need. This proactive approach prevents overspending on unnecessary licenses.

Q2: How can we mitigate the risk of indirect access charges from SAP?
A2: Transparency and clear terms are your allies. First, map out all systems and users that connect to SAP indirectly (third-party applications, customer or supplier portals, etc.). Discuss these with SAP upfront – don’t hide them. Negotiate a licensing approach for indirect usage, whether it’s adopting SAP’s Digital Access document model or a named-user approach that covers those external users. Crucially, get the agreement in writing: specify how those indirect uses are licensed so there’s no ambiguity during an audit. You can also seek an indirect usage clause where SAP agrees to let you purchase any required licenses to resolve compliance findings before it takes legal action. Staying ahead of this issue with a clear plan is the best way to avoid surprise fees later.

Q3: What are the key differences in negotiating a cloud contract like RISE with SAP versus a traditional on-premise deal?
A3: When negotiating RISE with SAP or cloud subscriptions, you must pay attention to contract elements that aren’t factors in on-prem deals. For example, cloud deals have a fixed term (you’re committing to, say, 3 years of subscription) – you need to negotiate renewal protections now (caps on price increases at renewal, an option to extend at the same rate, etc.). In a cloud contract, usage is subscription-based, so ensure the user counts or capacity can flex with your needs; on-prem, you could simply not use some licenses, but in the cloud, you pay regardless of the term. Also, clarify responsibilities: SAP’s RISE bundle includes infrastructure and basic support, but implementation services and many specifics are not included – you must negotiate any extras you require. Finally, cloud contracts often have standard SLAs and data policies; don’t assume they meet your needs. Be ready to push for adjustments in service levels or data location provisions. In short, focus on term flexibility, renewal terms, and scope of services much more heavily in a cloud deal than in a traditional license sale.

Q4: When is the best time to negotiate with SAP to get a favorable deal?
A4: Timing your negotiation can significantly improve your leverage. The best times are typically aligned with SAP’s sales targets and fiscal year cycles. SAP’s fiscal year-end (often December 31) or quarter-ends are periods when sales teams are under pressure to hit quotas. Engaging in serious negotiations late in the quarter or year can motivate SAP to offer bigger discounts or concessions to close the deal. However, be careful not to leave it too late, so that you run out of time. Ideally, start discussions early, but aim to finalize around those end-of-quarter crunch times. Additionally, if you’re moving to a new product (like S/4HANA or RISE), watch for SAP incentive programs or promotional periods – SAP sometimes offers extra discounts or credits to drive adoption, which you can leverage. Always combine good timing with a competitive alternative (even if just implied) to maximize the pressure on SAP to meet your terms.

Q5: How can we avoid being locked into unfavorable terms over the long run?
A5: The contract you sign should not put your company on autopilot with SAP for the next decade without escape routes. To avoid lock-in, negotiate flexibility upfront. This includes things like short renewal cycles (e.g., a 3-year term with an option to renew, instead of a 5-year locked commitment), and caps on any price hikes at renewal so you’re not shocked later. Insist on clauses that allow you to terminate or reduce scope for defined reasons (merger, divestiture, poor service performance) without heavy penalties – even if SAP resists, raising it can lead to middle-ground solutions. Ensure you have the right to your data and a plan to transition off if needed, which might involve SAP providing data export assistance. Finally, keep competitive options in play. Even after signing, periodically benchmark SAP’s offerings against the market. Suppose SAP knows you’re continuously evaluating others (or considering third-party support for on-prem). In that case, they are more likely to treat you as a valued, price-sensitive customer when renewal time comes. In essence, contractual safeguards plus a willingness to consider alternatives are the best antidotes to vendor lock-in.

Read about our SAP Contract Negotiation Service.

Do you want to know more about our SAP Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit