SAP ERP Private Cloud Negotiation Strategies for CIOs & Procurement Leaders — Benchmarking Edition
Executive Snapshot (Numeric TL;DR)
- Deep Discounts Are Achievable: Large SAP Private Cloud deals ($20M+/year) typically secure discounts of ~40–50% on 5-year subscriptions, with top-quartile negotiations achieving discounts of 60% or more. Mid-sized commitments (~$10M/year) can see a discount of 30–40% on 5-year terms, and even smaller deals (<$5M/year) can target a discount of 20–25% with savvy negotiation. Don’t settle for single-digit discounts – the norm is much higher.
- 3-Year vs. 5-Year Contracts: 5-year terms usually come with an extra 10–15 percentage point discount versus 3-year deals. For example, a mid-sized deal might get ~25% off for 3 years but ~35–40% off on a 5-year commitment. Leverage the longer term to drive price down – but only if you lock in protections.
- Renewal Price Protection is Critical: Aim to cap annual increases at 0–5%. Most contracts allow SAP’s standard indexation (up to ~5% per year, tied to inflation) unless you negotiate a specific ceiling. Best-in-class deals enforce flat pricing for the full term or a <=3% annual cap. Without a cap, a “good” first-term price can be erased by a big jump at renewal.
- Flexibility Clauses Are Rare but Vital: True-down rights (the ability to reduce usage commitments) appear in only ~25% of deals – typically allowing a 10–15% reduction if needed. Swap rights (exchanging one module or user type for another) show up in ~30% of deals. Push for these: they protect you if your needs change. Top-quartile contracts include multiple flexibility clauses, whereas a “standard” SAP contract includes none.
- Timing = Leverage: Deals initiated 6–9 months before renewal tend to yield the steepest concessions. Customers who timed negotiations with SAP’s quarter/year-end saw final discounts 10–15 percentage points better than initial offers. Example: An initial 20% off quote improved to ~35% by the end of Q4 when SAP was under pressure to close. Starting early and aligning with SAP’s fiscal deadlines can literally save millions.
- Incentives Can Boost Savings: Additional concessions can stack on top of base discounts. Signing by quarter-end can result in an additional 5–10% discount. Committing to adopt multiple SAP cloud products (e.g., adding SuccessFactors or Ariba) may bring an additional 5–10% bundle discount – but be cautious of shelfware. If SAP believes there’s a credible alternative (such as a third-party host or delaying the S/4HANA migration), they often concede another 5–15% to win the business.
- On-Premises to Cloud Migration Perks: Enterprises transitioning from on-premises environments received one-time credits in 2024 – e.g., 60% of the first-year fees were credited for S/4HANA on-premises customers moving to RISE, and ~45% for ECC clients. These incentives significantly offset migration costs. Utilize them: they effectively reduce TCO in year one, but remember to negotiate the run rate after the credit period.
- “Good vs Best” Outcomes: A “good” deal at renewal meets the median benchmarks (e.g., ~30% off for a $10M/year contract) with some basic protections. A “best-in-class” deal hits top-quartile numbers (e.g,. 50%+ off for that same deal) and includes strong flexibility (true-down, swaps) and firm price caps. The gap is huge – entering talks armed with benchmarks is what moves you from a merely good result to a market-leading one.
Read our playbook on how to negotiate Rise with SAP deals.
Why SAP ERP Private Cloud Negotiation is Different
Negotiating SAP’s Private Cloud (including RISE with SAP and HEC deals) isn’t like the old on-prem license discussions. You’re now dealing with an all-in-one subscription bundle – which means subscription lock-in and potentially less transparency.
Key differences to keep in mind:
- From Owning to Renting: In the past, you purchased perpetual licenses and paid annual maintenance fees. Now you pay yearly for cloud access. This shift gives SAP more control – if you stop paying, you will lose access to the software. High switching costs (migrating off SAP) amplify SAP’s leverage. They know you can’t easily walk away after Year 3 or 5, so they may push for aggressive renewal terms. Your job is to counter that by baking in protections up front.
- Bundled Pricing – Opaque by Design: SAP’s private cloud subscriptions bundle software, infrastructure hosting, and support services into one fee. Convenient, but it hides the cost breakdown. SAP likes it that way – it’s harder for you to tell if the infrastructure component, for example, is overpriced. Always ask SAP to unbundle the pricing. Knowing the internal makeup (app vs. infrastructure vs. support) allows you to benchmark each piece and challenge any part that appears inflated.
- Renewal = Vendor Advantage: With traditional licenses, once you paid, you had some freedom. In the cloud, SAP essentially renegotiates every time your term is up. Their strategy often involves offering a reasonable first-term price, then raising rates later when you’re fully dependent on them. We’ve seen SAP propose price hikes of 20% or more at renewal if no caps were set. This is why negotiating renewal terms now (caps, options to reduce scope) is crucial. SAP’s margin priorities ≠ your financial governance – they will push to expand revenue, whereas you must enforce cost predictability.
- All-or-Nothing Scope: Private Cloud deals (especially RISE) are often pitched as “transformational” – they tend to bundle numerous modules and extras (analytics, BTP, etc.). SAP’s narrative is that you’re getting a full stack. The flip side: you might pay for modules or capacity you won’t use immediately (or ever). And unlike modular on-prem licensing, you can’t “shelf” a cloud subscription easily. Negotiation must therefore include usage flexibility – e.g., the right to scale down or swap out unused components – to avoid being stuck with expensive shelfware in the cloud.
- Vendor-Managed Infrastructure: In SAP Private Cloud, SAP or its hyperscaler partners run the system for you. This shifts operational burden off your plate, but also means you’re trusting SAP’s hosting margins. SAP often significantly marks up cloud infrastructure. They bank on you accepting a premium for one-stop convenience. A savvy negotiator will benchmark SAP’s cloud infrastructure costs against the market (AWS/Azure direct rates) and push back on any premium that isn’t justified by added value. In some cases, companies have carved out the hosting or gotten SAP to price-match market rates once challenged.
- The ECC 2027 Countdown: There’s a hard deadline looming – mainstream support for SAP ECC (the old ERP) ends by 2027. SAP knows that many customers feel pressured to move to S/4HANA Cloud (often via RISE Private Edition) before then. This dynamic can hurt or help you. On one hand, if SAP senses you must move, they might stiffen on discounts. On the other hand, SAP has huge cloud adoption goals – they need success stories. If you signal that you might delay migration or explore alternatives, SAP will often sweeten the deal to get you on board now (e.g., larger discounts or migration funding). Use the 2027 deadline as a bargaining chip: make SAP earn your commitment with a better offer.
Bottom line:
In SAP Private Cloud negotiations, you’re negotiating a long-term relationship, not a one-time sale. The keys are to pin down costs and rights now, while you have maximum leverage, and not to buy into SAP’s “all-in” sales pitch without scrutiny.
Be prepared to challenge everything – from the list price, to what’s included in the bundle, to how future growth or changes will be handled. This proactive, skeptical stance is essential because once you sign, the power shifts markedly to SAP.
Benchmark Set 1 — Discounts by Spend Band & Term
Table 1: SAP ERP Private Cloud Base Discount Benchmarks (2024–2025) – The baseline subscription discounts off SAP’s list price, by deal size and term length.
Larger spend and longer terms generally mean deeper discounts, but ensure you meet the typical conditions to achieve those top-quartile numbers.
Spend Band (Annual ACV) | 36-Month Term – Discount off List <br> (Median / P75 / Top Quartile) | 60-Month Term – Discount off List <br> (Median / P75 / Top Quartile) | Typical Conditions for Top Quartile |
---|---|---|---|
Band A: <$5M/year | ~15% / 20% / 25% off list price | ~20% / 30% / 35% off list price | – Usually achieved by end-of-year deal timing. – Possibly bundling additional SAP products to boost volume. – Strong negotiation even at low spend (peers have done it). |
Band B: $5–10M/year | ~20% / 30% / 35% off | ~30% / 40% / 45% off | – Multi-year commitment (5yr) drives higher end of range. – Competitive bids or credible alternative considered. – Include extra modules (with caution) to get bundle discounts. |
Band C: $10–20M/year | ~30% / 35% / 45% off | ~35% / 45% / 55% off | – Leverage status as a significant SAP client. – Likely involves global roll-out (SAP keen for win). – Requires asserting benchmark data (show SAP you know 50% is achievable). |
Band D: $20–40M/year | ~35% / 50% / 55% off | ~45% / 55% / 60% off | – Needs C-level involvement and year-end timing for best result. – Possibly committing to be a reference or early adopter in exchange for max discount. – Very strong alternative plan (e.g. in-house or competitor) to push into 50%+ territory. |
Band E: >$40M/year | ~40% / 55% / 60%+ off | ~50% / 60% / 70% off | – “Must-win” deal for SAP – they’ll bend far if pressured. – Often includes strategic incentives (migration credits, etc.). – Customer likely negotiated global enterprise agreement with strict terms. |
Interpretation: For example, if you’re renewing a $25M/year private cloud agreement for 5 years (Band D), the median peer discount is approximately 45% off the list price.
A well-negotiated deal (75th percentile) is about 55% off, and top-quartile deals hit ~60% off. In practice, hitting the top quartile requires pulling multiple levers (timing, competitive pressure, multi-year lock-in) and likely means SAP views your company as a strategic, must-retain client.
Rule of thumb: For big spenders, if you’re not getting at least ~25% off on a 5-year term (and usually much more), you’re leaving money on the table. Conversely, smaller deals have less inherent leverage, but even a <$5M/year customer can push for 20%+ off, especially on a longer commitment.
Table 2: Incremental Concessions & Uplifts – Beyond Base Discounts – These are the extra sweeteners you can negotiate by meeting certain conditions or using specific tactics.
They add on to whatever base discount you negotiate from Table 1.
Concession Lever | Typical Uplift (Extra Discount) | Preconditions to Secure | Caveats / Watch-Outs |
---|---|---|---|
Quarter-End / Early Signature Sign by SAP’s fiscal quarter or year-end | +5–10% off the final price | SAP needs to know you can close the deal by their deadline. Align your internal approvals to hit Q4 or year-end. | Time-sensitive: if you miss the window, the extra discount may vanish. Don’t let SAP rush you into a bad deal just to meet their timeline – only sign if terms are truly favorable. |
Multi-Application Bundle Include additional SAP cloud products or modules | +5–10% off (bundle discount) | Expand scope to other SAP offerings (e.g. add SuccessFactors, Ariba, BTP credits) in one deal. This higher total ACV often bumps you into a better discount tier. | Beware shelfware: Only bundle products you genuinely need. SAP might offer a tempting discount to include a low-value module – but if you won’t use it, even “free” can be too expensive. Ensure each component has justified ROI. |
Competitive Leverage Show SAP you have alternatives | +5–15% off (pressure-based) | Present a credible threat: a third-party hosting RFP, an evaluation of other ERP vendors, or a plan to delay migration. SAP must believe you are willing to walk away or postpone. High-level executive signals (CEO/CFO engagement) also amplify this leverage. | It backfires if SAP thinks you’re bluffing. Only play this card if you have a viable plan B (even if temporary). Also, pushing too hard on “we might go elsewhere” requires finesse – maintain a tone of preference to stay with SAP if terms are right. You want a better deal, not a poisoned relationship. |
License Migration Credits Trade in on-prem licenses for cloud credit | (One-time) 50–60% off Year 1 fees | You have substantial existing SAP license investments (with active maintenance). SAP often grants a credit equal to 45–60% of first-year subscription fees when you convert to RISE/Private Cloud. This effectively slashes initial costs. | This is a one-off benefit: Year 2+ will revert to normal fees. Ensure the underlying subscription price (after credit) is competitive long-term. Also, clarify how the credit is applied – e.g. against services or future bills – so you fully realize its value. |
Use these levers in combination. For example, a client secured a ~30% base discount, then another 10% by timing the signing for December, and approximately 5% more by hinting at a third-party cloud option – resulting in a total of around 45% off.
The key is to meet SAP’s conditions (e.g. deadlines, broader adoption) without overcommitting on your side. Never agree to add something or sign early unless the extra concession is truly valuable and confirmed in writing.
Callout: 📌 Band D/E customers – if you’re spending $20M+ per year and not seeing at least 25% off on a 5-year term (before any special credits), stop. That’s significantly below market.
Renegotiate with benchmark data on hand, or involve executive sponsorship, because you should be achieving far better results (often 40–50% or more off for big deals with the right strategy).
Benchmark Set 2 — Commitment Structures & Flexibility
Not all SAP Private Cloud deals are structured in the same way. How you shape your commitment (flat vs ramped usage, bundled vs separated components) can impact both pricing and flexibility.
Below, we benchmark common deal models and key flexibility clauses.
Table 3: Private Cloud Deal Models (2025 Adoption Trends) –
Understanding these models helps you choose a structure that fits your needs and negotiating stance.
Deal Model | % of Deals (2025) | Pros | Cons | Best Fit For… |
---|---|---|---|---|
Flat Subscription Commit to full usage from Day 1, fixed annual fee | ~60% | Simplicity – the same bill each year, easy to budget. Immediate access to all subscribed capacity/users. | You pay for full capacity even if your rollout or uptake is gradual. Little flexibility if you over-estimated needs. | Steady-state or smaller deployments that go live all at once. Companies that value cost predictability over optimization of ramp-up. |
Ramped Subscription Phased ramp-up of users or modules over term | ~40% | Aligns costs with actual deployment timeline – you don’t pay for users until they’re onboarded. Can negotiate volume tiers as you scale. | More complex contract with multiple phases and pricing steps. If not negotiated well, later ramp years could have higher unit prices locked in. | Large or global implementations with staggered rollouts. Organizations unsure of immediate uptake, needing a gradual commitment. |
Bundled Hosting SAP provides infrastructure & basis under one contract (RISE model) | ~90% | One vendor accountable end-to-end (licensing, support, cloud ops). Simplified support – “one throat to choke” if issues arise. | Often a premium on infrastructure – SAP’s bundled cloud costs can be ~20%+ higher than DIY. Less flexibility to optimize or switch infrastructure if performance/cost is an issue. | Companies without extensive cloud IT capability or who want a turnkey SAP solution. Those who value convenience and unified SLA over possibly lower cost piecemeal sourcing. |
Modular Carve-Out Separate certain components from the main bundle | ~10% | Flexibility to optimize pieces – e.g. using a third-party for hosting or keeping a specific module on-prem/outside subscription. Potential cost savings if you can source parts cheaper or not pay for what you don’t use. | SAP resists unbundling – you’ll need strong justification and leverage. Integration and accountability become more complex when not one hand to shake (or choke). | Very large enterprises that can negotiate custom arrangements. Those with unique requirements (regulatory, technical) for a part of the SAP environment – e.g. keep sensitive data on-prem or use a preferred cloud provider for infrastructure. |
Guidance: Most customers go with SAP’s bundled model by default – it’s the core of RISE with SAP. However, be aware that convenience may come at a hidden cost.
Always price out a “what-if” scenario (e.g., you manage infrastructure separately) to see the difference. If the gap is significant, consider a carve-out or, at the very least, use that analysis to negotiate a better bundled rate with SAP.
Meanwhile, the decision between flat and ramped should be driven by your deployment plan. If you don’t truly need everyone on Day 1, a ramp can save you money in the early years – just negotiate to keep the unit pricing consistent or improving as volume grows (SAP shouldn’t penalize you for phasing).
Ramped deals do introduce some complexity, but if structured well, they can be a win-win (SAP gets a committed growth plan, you get cost aligned to value).
Table 4: Flexibility Clauses in SAP Private Cloud Contracts –
How common are they, and what do they typically allow?
These clauses can protect you, but they are not standard; you must ask for and fight for them.
Clause (What it does) | Prevalence <br>(% of deals with it) | Typical Allowance <br>(Median / Top Quartile) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
True-Down Right Ability to reduce users or spend mid-term or at renewal if usage is lower | ~25% of deals include any true-down | Typically allow up to ~10% reduction at a defined true-down point (often at renewal or end of year 3 in a 5-year term). Top-quartile deals: 20–30% reduction allowed without penalty. | Extremely important if your initial usage estimates are uncertain. SAP won’t volunteer this – you must insist. Usually, you’ll define a window (e.g. at 36 months) to adjust the subscription down by a percentage. Negotiate the percentage and conditions upfront. The higher, the better – it directly limits paying for unused capacity. |
Swap Rights Exchange license types or modules for others | ~30% of deals (some form of swap/flex) | Median case: 1-time swap of up to ~10–15% of FUEs between modules or user types of equal value. Top deals: more liberal swap annually or broader scope (any unused subscriptions swapped). | This is protection against changing requirements – e.g. you bought too many logistics users but need more HR users. Define the swap mechanism clearly: which products, how often (once during term or per year), and any fees (aim for none or minimal). Note: swaps usually must be within the same product family or value bucket. |
Mid-Term Repricing Contractual trigger to adjust pricing during term | ~10% (rarely seen unless large deal) | Median: None – SAP strongly prefers fixed subscription fees. Only very large clients negotiate an explicit reprice clause. Top quartile: A mid-term benchmark review or price adjustment if certain conditions met (e.g. if cloud prices broadly drop, or if your actual usage is far under projection). | This is tough to get. One approach is a benchmark clause: at year 3, you can compare your rates to market benchmarks and if SAP is, say, >10% above market, they agree to adjust. Another approach is tie to utilization: if you’re using <50% of what you paid for by mid-term, you get to re-negotiate volumes or fees. Be prepared for pushback – SAP will say their cost structure is fixed for term. Still, it’s worth trying for large, strategic deals. |
Module Carve-Out Options Right to drop or externalize a specific module | ~15% (in initial contract); more often negotiated at renewal | Median: Not included initially. Any carve-out usually comes as an ad-hoc negotiation later (or requires a separate amendment). Top quartile (very large deals): A clause allowing you to remove a certain component (e.g. an add-on like SAP Analytics Cloud or a particular functional module) after a set time, or move it off SAP’s cloud if desired. | If there’s a part of the bundle you’re unsure about, negotiate an “off-ramp” for it. For example, “We can terminate Module X after year 2 with no penalty” or “We reserve the right to shift the DEV/Test environment to our own cloud after year 1.” Such carve-outs are custom – SAP won’t want to set precedent, but if it’s a dealbreaker for you (and you have clout), you can get it. Clearly outline how pricing will adjust if the carve-out is exercised. |
Checklist: Must-Have Protections in Your Contract:
- True-Down Threshold: Aim to reduce your user count or spend by at least 10–15% at a defined point. This ensures you’re not stuck overpaying if your actual usage or business needs come in lower than expected. The more generous the truth, the more breathing room you have.
- Reallocation/SWAP Rights: Insist on flexibility to reassign licenses between modules or user types. For example, you can swap 10–20% of one type of user for another without incurring any additional costs. Business needs evolve – your contract should too, without requiring a whole new negotiation each time.
- Mid-Term Price Check: If possible, include a clause to benchmark and reprice at mid-term. Even if it’s just a “meet-and-discuss” provision, it puts SAP on notice that you will revisit pricing if market rates shift or if your deployment scale doesn’t match assumptions.
- Growth Protections: Lock in pricing for additional users or capacity. Any additional users, storage, or new modules you add later should be offered at the same discount % or unit price as the initial purchase. Also, cap the cost of any expansions (e.g. if you double your user count, you shouldn’t suddenly pay list price on the new ones). This prevents SAP from charging you excessively for inevitable growth.
In essence, flexibility = savings + risk mitigation. Every clause above either saves you money if things change or prevents future battles with SAP.
While SAP will claim their standard cloud contract can’t be altered, real-world deals show that with determination (and leverage), you can secure these protections. It’s all about making SAP acknowledge that a slightly more flexible contract is better than a lost customer.
Benchmark Set 3 — Price Protections & Indexation
One of the biggest risks in a multi-year cloud deal is price creep – the cost can ratchet up over time if you’re not careful. This section benchmarks how companies lock in prices and handle indexation (inflation and other increases).
Table 5: Price Lock Patterns in SAP Private Cloud Deals – How long are prices kept fixed, and where do increases slip in?
Contract Component | Median Price Lock | Top Quartile (Best-Case) | Notes & Best Practices |
---|---|---|---|
Subscription Fees (Licenses + Support) The core annual ERP cloud fee per user or capacity | Fixed for the initial term length is typical. E.g. a 3-year deal has the per-unit price locked those 3 years (no annual increase during term). However, any renewal is normally at SAP’s discretion/pricing at that future time unless capped. | Fixed for a longer horizon or with renewal cap. E.g. best cases: 5-year term with a right to renew at the same price for an additional 1–2 years, or a cap (≤5% increase) on the renewal rate. | Don’t assume any protection beyond the initial term – you must negotiate it. At minimum, get a cap on the first renewal increase (e.g. “no more than 5% hike at renewal”). In top deals, customers secured an extension option at locked rates, effectively getting 6–7 years at the initial price. This is rare but illustrates what leverage can achieve. Always clarify if “price lock” means no increases and that the same discount % will apply to any additional licenses you add mid-term. |
Cloud Infrastructure (Hosting) The portion of fees for hosting/technical managed services | SAP typically fixes the infrastructure fee based on the initial configuration for the term. If you don’t change your usage profile, that rate is stable in the term. But note: if you need more CPU, memory, storage later, those additions often come at prevailing (higher) rates unless pre-negotiated. | Locked unit rates and growth caps. Best-case deals define the cost of incremental capacity now (e.g. “additional 1TB of storage at $X flat, up to Y TB”). Top quartile contracts also secured a cap on any underlying cloud cost pass-through – for instance, if Azure costs rise, SAP can’t just charge more; it’s fixed or capped. | Treat infrastructure like a commodity – push SAP to match market price trends. If AWS/Azure are known to drop prices over time, argue that your hosting fees should reflect that, or at least not rise. If your system usage might grow, lock in prices for expansion now. The worst scenario is having to pay full list for extra capacity later because you didn’t fix it upfront. Also, ensure the contract defines what’s included (production, test environments, disaster recovery) so SAP doesn’t charge extra later for basics. |
Maintenance (Legacy Support) Support fees on any remaining on-prem licenses, or extended maintenance during transition | By default, SAP’s maintenance (for on-prem products) can increase annually – recently up to 5% per year in some regions (pegged to inflation). Median customers accept the standard support policy, meaning if SAP raises the maintenance percentage or baseline, they pay the uplift. | Cap or freeze during transition. Best cases: customers negotiating a cloud move got a maintenance fee freeze or cap (<=3%/yr) until they cut over to the cloud. Or they tied maintenance increases to fixed nominal rates lower than SAP’s default. | If you’re in a hybrid situation (part on-prem, part cloud), don’t ignore the on-prem maintenance line. SAP has been hiking those fees (often citing inflation). You can make it part of the deal: “We’ll move to cloud, but you hold our ECC maintenance at 22% with 0% increase for the next 2 years while we transition.” Use SAP’s eagerness for your cloud adoption as leverage to protect legacy costs during the migration period. Once fully in the cloud, of course, this becomes moot – but then your focus must shift to capping the cloud subscription itself at renewal. |
Table 6: Indexation Clauses – What’s Typical and What to Push For –
“Indexation” refers to the potential increase in your fees due to inflation or other factors.
Below are common clause types and their terms:
Indexation Clause Type | Median Annual Cap | 75th Percentile (Better Deals) | Notes | Counter-Ask |
---|---|---|---|---|
No Index During Initial Term Fixed price for term | 0% increase during the initial contract term. This is common: e.g. you pay the same yearly fee for years 1, 2, 3 of a 3-year deal. (Multi-year deals often inherently have flat annual fees, which is effectively a built-in 0% indexation.) | 0% increase (standard in best cases) plus some secure an extension at that rate. The top quartile simply holds firm on “no uplifts, period” for the committed term. | Many SAP cloud proposals come with flat pricing for the term – but always double-check. If you see any mention of “an annual X% adjustment,” that’s indexation sneaking in. Best practice: explicitly state “Subscription fees shall remain fixed for the initial term” in the contract. | Ask for 0% indexation outright. It’s a reasonable ask for a multi-year deal – you’re committing upfront, you deserve rate certainty. Emphasize that your budget approval hinged on those fixed figures. |
Fixed Escalator Pre-set yearly increase | ~3% per year is a common ask from SAP if they do include one. Some proposals have clauses like “fees increase 3% annually starting year 2”. (Seen more in 5-year deals or in infrastructure-heavy deals.) | 1–2% per year in better-negotiated cases, and often not kicking in until later years (e.g. 0% for first 2 years, then 2% in years 3–5). Top deals avoid any escalator, but if one exists, they keep it very low. | A fixed escalator at least provides predictability, but it still compounds cost. If inflation is low, 3% might be a windfall for SAP. Only concede a small escalator if SAP absolutely won’t give a flat term, and try to defer it (no increases for as long as possible). Also tie it to performance/service if you can (e.g. “3% only if SLA met each year”). | Counter: If SAP insists on a rise, counter with 1–2% max, or even better, every other year (not annual). Frame it as sharing inflation risk – you’re willing to index a little, but not 5% or unpredictable CPI. And get something in return for accepting any escalator (e.g. ability to terminate early or additional credits). |
CPI-Linked Indexation Fees tied to an inflation index (e.g. CPI) | Often capped at 5% in recent SAP contracts. SAP introduced CPI-based increases for support: e.g. “annual fee increase equal to Eurozone CPI, capped at 5%”. Median scenario, if such a clause exists, is a 5% ceiling (which is quite high). | Capped at 3% in best cases, or switched to a fixed low number. Top-quartile deals sometimes get no CPI clause at all (especially outside of support context) by pushing back hard. | CPI sounds fair (“just inflation”), but it can bite you if inflation spikes. A 5% cap still means potentially 5% every year – which over a 5-year term is 25% more. If SAP proposes any index link, insist on a firm cap. And note the reference index (which country’s CPI?) and timing (calendar or contract anniversary?). It should be very clearly defined. | Counter: Propose a lower cap (<=3%) or a fixed number instead of CPI. E.g. “3% or CPI, whichever is lower”. If inflation cools, you pay less. Ideally, strike CPI entirely and go with either a small fixed escalator or none. No one has a crystal ball on inflation – better not to gamble your ERP costs on it. |
Renewal Increase Cap Limit on price jump at renewal | No cap by default – median deals have no contractual limit on renewal pricing (it’s a negotiation to happen later). If negotiated, a typical cap might be ~5–7% on the year-6 price if renewing a 5-year deal. | 5% or lower cap in better deals. A few customers locked in rights to renew at 0–3% increase at least for one renewal cycle. Top quartile might get the ability to renew at same price for a short extension (e.g. 1-year extension at same rate to allow transition). | Renewal caps are arguably the most important protection, yet least common since it’s about a future term. If your deal ends in 2025 or 2026, SAP usually wants to renegotiate from scratch. But you can attempt to fix a maximum increase now. Emphasize that you need cost predictability for long-term planning. Even if you can’t get a fixed renewal price, get a ceiling – e.g. “no more than 5% uplift if we renew for equivalent terms.” | Ask well ahead: Introduce renewal cap language in negotiations early, when SAP is hungry to close the current deal. For example: “Provided we renew for a similar term and scope, the subscription fee increase shall not exceed 5%.” If they balk, push for a modest cap or at least a first-right-of-refusal to extend at a set rate. Some customers also negotiate an option to convert to perpetual licenses at end of term as leverage, though SAP rarely grants that – it doesn’t hurt to ask in initial drafts. |
Key Takeaway: Lock down the money terms. Indexation can quietly turn a decent deal into an expensive one over time. Many CIOs have been caught off guard when a 0% increase in the first three years suddenly becomes a +10–15% cost surge in years 4–5 due to compounding increases or a renewal reset. The goal is cost predictability – your board and CFO hate surprises.
So, wherever possible: fix the price, cap the unknowns, and get it in writing. If SAP’s cloud value proposition is true, they shouldn’t need stealthy price hikes to drive revenue – hold them to that.
(Side note: SAP’s own sales reps are measured on cloud contract value, so they have motivation to allow indexation or short-term teaser rates with later hikes. Don’t focus only on the Year 1 price; ensure Years 5, 6, and 7 are accounted for. Negotiating a great initial discount but ignoring indexation is like winning the battle and losing the war.)
Benchmark Set 4 — Optimization Levers
Beyond pure negotiation tactics, CIOs and procurement leaders should remember that what you buy (and how you use it) can drastically affect costs.
This sets benchmarks for the savings achievable through internal optimization levers – essentially, ensuring you’re not overbuying or overpaying for things you don’t need in the SAP Private Cloud.
Table 7: High-Impact Savings Levers in SAP ERP Private Cloud –
Typical savings if you execute these optimizations, based on 2024–25 deal data.
Optimization Lever (What you do) | Median Savings <br>(vs. not doing it) | 75th Percentile <br>(High ROI cases) | Top Quartile <br>(Aggressive use) | Adoption Challenges (What could limit you) |
---|---|---|---|---|
License Rationalization Rightsize user licenses and eliminate shelfware before moving to cloud | ~15% cost reduction | ~18% savings | 20%+ in best cases | The big question: “Do we really need all these users/modules?” Many enterprises find 10–20% of their named users or modules were barely used. Before signing a new cloud deal, scrub your user list and entitlements. Challenge: Internal resistance from business units (“don’t take my licenses”) and the effort to analyze usage. It requires executive sponsorship to pull licenses from low-usage areas. But every user you drop is immediate savings annually. |
Carve-Out Hosting Provide your own hosting or use a third-party instead of SAP’s bundled infra | ~10% off total contract value | ~12% savings | Up to ~15% saved | If you have the capability (or a cloud partner), you can run S/4HANA on a hyperscaler directly, purchasing just the software subscription from SAP. Customers who separated hosting have saved around 8–12% versus SAP’s all-in price, because they avoid SAP’s infra markup. Challenge: SAP may push back or offer a counter-discount to keep hosting bundled. Also, you need cloud and Basis expertise in-house or via a partner to manage the system. This lever is most viable for large enterprises that can achieve economies of scale on their own. |
Shelfware Recovery Remove or renegotiate unused modules and extras | ~12% of subscription value | ~15% | ~20% | Similar to license rationalization but specific to modules/functionality. Maybe you bought SAP Analytics Cloud or other add-ons in a bundle “just in case.” If they’re not delivering value, try to remove them from the renewal or get SAP to credit their cost toward something you do need. Challenge: Bundled deals often hide individual module prices, making it hard to value them. You may need to insist on line-item pricing during negotiation to target this later. Also, SAP might say “it’s free in the bundle” – it’s not free, it’s baked in. Be ready to assign a value to each component and press to cut the dead weight. |
Modular/Phased Adoption Stagger module uptake and only pay when value is realized | ~10% reduction in TCO over term | ~15% | ~20% or more (if major deferrals) | This is about timing your spend. Don’t commit to everything on day one if some modules (e.g. CRM, SRM, etc.) won’t be implemented until year 3. Negotiate to phase in fees for those later, or sign them as options instead of firm commitments. Some enterprises shaved 10%+ off TCO by deferring certain costs to when they’re actually needed. Challenge: SAP will push for a big bang sale. You need a clear deployment roadmap and the discipline to say “not yet” for certain components. Also ensure future add-on prices are agreed (to avoid a later price gouge). This lever may conflict with SAP’s desire to bundle for discount; you have to model if paying slightly more per unit later is worth not paying for 2 years of unused service now. |
Table 8: Program Mix & Sourcing Strategy Benchmarks – Comparing SAP’s private cloud programs vs alternatives. Sometimes the best optimization is choosing the right deployment program or mix.
Strategy Comparison | Effective Cost Difference (Est. Rate Delta) | Best Fit Scenario | Key Risks | Switching Friction |
---|---|---|---|---|
RISE with SAP vs. SAP HEC All-in subscription (RISE private edition) vs. using HEC (SAP Hana Enterprise Cloud) with separate license | RISE often ~10–15% lower TCO for net-new S/4HANA deployments, if you leverage SAP’s incentives. (SAP claims up to 20% TCO reduction vs on-prem; HEC historically could be pricier because you pay license + cloud separately.) | RISE: Best if you’re moving to S/4 and want a single contract including licenses, infrastructure, and support – SAP tends to give strong incentives (credits, discounts) to go this route. HEC: Fits if you already own licenses (e.g. you’ve bought S/4 perpetual) and just need SAP or a partner to host/manage it, or if you require a more bespoke infrastructure setup not offered in RISE. | RISE risk: Lock-in – you surrender your perpetual licenses for subscription. If later unhappy, you’d have to re-negotiate or re-purchase licenses to exit. Also, RISE’s “black box” bundle can hide cost allocations – you may overpay for infrastructure if you don’t negotiate it down. HEC risk: You might miss out on some RISE-specific benefits (SAP bundling extras like BTP credits, or certain exclusive product innovations that SAP initially tied to RISE). Also HEC has had mixed reviews on flexibility and cost – ensure you get transparency in that model too. | RISE to HEC: High friction – moving out of RISE means you need to re-establish license ownership or find a new support model. Essentially, unwinding RISE is like switching vendors entirely, since your ERP runs on SAP’s contract. HEC to RISE: Moderate friction – since both are SAP-run, SAP will happily transition you from HEC to RISE, usually converting your licenses. Still, you might lose some original license entitlements or face new T&Cs. HEC to other: You own the licenses, so you could move hosting to another provider or on-prem relatively easier (contractually) than if those licenses were subscription. |
RISE vs. Self-Managed Using SAP’s cloud subscription vs. running SAP on your own infrastructure (on-prem or IaaS) | RISE is marketed as ~20% TCO savings vs traditional on-prem over a few years, mainly due to eliminating hardware/maintenance costs. In practice, costs can be similar or higher in the long run if you have a cost-efficient IT team. Many customers report RISE is initially cheaper (with credits) but could be ~10%+ more expensive beyond the first 3–5 years if not negotiated well. | RISE: Suits companies that want to outsource the complexity of infrastructure and get to S/4HANA quickly without building internal cloud expertise. Also good if you need SAP’s accountability for SLAs and one hand to hold for upgrades. Self-Managed (own data center or hyperscaler with your team or an MSP): Best if you already run a tight ship on infrastructure or have strategic reasons to keep control (data sovereignty, customization freedom). It can be cost-effective for companies that can optimize cloud resources and only pay for what they use. | RISE risk: You might lose some flexibility – e.g. adapting the system deeply, choosing timing of upgrades (SAP manages that in RISE). There’s also the risk that after initial term, SAP increases prices and you have limited alternatives. DIY risk: Managing SAP environments is not trivial – if your team or partner underestimates it, you could incur higher support costs or performance issues. Also, if you stay on-premises too long, you face the 2027 ECC support cliff and possibly running outdated technology longer than desired. | RISE to Self-Managed: High friction – you’d need to negotiate license conversion (if even possible) or start over with new licenses. Data extraction and transition would be a major project, effectively a re-implementation or at least a complex migration off SAP’s managed environment. Self to RISE: Moderate friction – SAP will welcome you to RISE, offering conversion programs (credits for your existing investment). Still, you’ll need to align contract terms carefully to not lose previous favorable terms (like legacy discounts or usage rights). Expect a full contract renegotiation. |
Insights: If cost is king and you have a capable IT organization, RISE is not automatically the cheapest option – do the math. Some large IT shops find they can run SAP on a hyperscaler for less than SAP’s charge, especially if they optimize usage. However, factor in the value of SAP handling updates, support, and one-throat accountability.
On the other hand, if you already have significant sunk costs in SAP licenses (perhaps you’re mid-ECC or already purchased S/4HANA on-prem), you might leverage HEC or a hybrid approach to reuse those licenses in the cloud without immediately jumping to subscription.
Just be aware that SAP’s strategic focus is on RISE – HEC customers sometimes report feeling like they’re in a legacy program. SAP might eventually push everyone to RISE-like models.
In any case, keep your options open. Even if you attend RISE, negotiating as if you could go elsewhere will likely net you a better deal.
And if you’re renewing RISE, quietly evaluate if bringing some part of it in-house or to another provider is feasible – that gives you a Plan B to mention at the table.
High-ROI “Quick Win” Actions: Based on our benchmarking, these are immediate steps that often yield significant savings or cost avoidance in SAP Private Cloud environments:
- Eliminate Shelfware: Proactively identify and eliminate ~10–15% of unused SAP users or modules before renewal. Why pay for what you don’t use? Do a usage audit and trim the fat.
- Consider Carve-Out Hosting: Compare SAP’s hosting costs to a direct quote from a hyperscaler. If SAP’s bundle is bloated, negotiating a carve-out or separate hosting arrangement can save roughly 8–12% without impacting your SAP software use.
- Optimize License Types: Not everyone needs a “Professional User” license. Rightsize roles (e.g., use Limited/Flexible user types where appropriate). Proper role mapping and user tier optimization typically saves 12–18% by aligning cost to actual usage patterns.
- Enforce True-Downs: If you wisely negotiated a true-down clause previously, use it! Many companies leave money on the table by not invoking a right to reduce volumes. Enforcing a true-down at renewal (say usage dropped, so you drop 10% the subscription) directly cuts ~10% of spend going forward.
Each of these levers attacks waste. SAP contracts often have “buffet syndrome” – you bought more than you consume.
The cure is regular diet and exercise: routinely analyze usage and adjust contracts accordingly. It’s not a one-time negotiation but an ongoing optimization mindset.
Benchmark Set 5 — Negotiation Dynamics & Timing
How you conduct the negotiation – its timing, pace, and signals – can influence the outcome as much as the raw numbers. This section benchmarks typical discount movements over a negotiation cycle and the impact of leverage tactics at key moments.
Table 9: Discount Movement vs. Timing of Negotiations –
How much do discounts typically improve as you approach the contract deadline?
Stage Before Renewal | Median % Discount Movement (from previous stage) | Risks at this Stage | Negotiation Tips |
---|---|---|---|
T – 180 days (6+ months out; initial quote stage) | Initial offer ~10–15% off list (baseline). No significant movement yet. SAP’s first proposal is usually conservative, often not much better than standard discount schedules. | If you accept early, you’ll overpay – this is SAP testing the waters. Also, at 6+ months out, SAP isn’t feeling deadline pressure yet, so they may be slow to concede. Internally, you risk stakeholders losing focus if the process drags. | Start early, but don’t show your hand. At six months out, gather data and set your goals. Let SAP know you’re evaluating options, but avoid committing. Use this time for internal alignment (IT, procurement, CFO) and benchmarking. Signal to SAP that their opening bid is far from acceptable, but don’t counter too low too fast – pace yourself. |
T – 90 days (3 months out; active negotiation) | +10% improvement in discount by this point (median). For example, that initial 15% off might now be ~25% off after a couple rounds. SAP often increases discount mid-negotiation, especially if you’ve shown leverage (alternative consideration, etc.). | With 3 months left, time is ticking. Risk: if you haven’t involved higher-ups yet, you might not have escalation room. Also, SAP might stall, expecting you to cave as time dwindles. If you’re not making progress by now, there’s a risk of running into a last-minute crunch. | Apply pressure, wisely. By T-90, ensure you have brought in any competitive leverage (e.g. an RFP or publicly hinting at delaying). It’s also a good time to involve an executive sponsor on your side – SAP pays attention when a CFO is in the loop. Make it clear you have a timeline too: for instance, “We need final offers 6 weeks before renewal to go to the board.” This creates a mini-deadline for SAP and prevents them from dragging you into the last week unnecessarily. |
T – 30 days (1 month out; finalization looming) | +5% more discount (median additional concession). By now perhaps ~30% off in our example scenario. SAP has likely labeled you a “high priority” deal if still unsigned. They often find a bit more discount or extra perks in the last month to get you in contract. | The last month is nerve-wracking. Biggest risk: running out of time for legal and procurement processes. If significant terms are still unresolved, a month can disappear quickly. SAP knows this and may exploit the time crunch (“if we can’t sign by next week, our quarter pricing expires”). Also, internally, you’ll have pressure not to disrupt operations by passing the renewal date. These factors can force you to settle for less than ideal terms if unprepared. | Hold your line, but be ready. At 30 days out, you should have your deal points nailed down to just a few contested items. Prioritize what’s left (e.g. price vs. a clause – decide what’s more important). Use the fact that SAP really wants closure this quarter: “We’re very close. If you can move the discount from 30% to 35% and include a 5% renewal cap, we will sign.” Be explicit and firm. Also, get your legal documents pre-reviewed as much as possible; you want to be able to sign quickly once terms are met. |
T – 7 days (Last week; deadline pressure) | +3–5% final drop in price (median). It’s common to see a small final discount or an extra incentive (e.g. some free services or extra licenses) thrown in during the last week, if needed to close. SAP’s managers often have authority to give a bit more right before the buzzer. | This is high stakes. Risk: last-minute changes or “stickiness” – SAP might try the “best and final” bluff now. Or they could introduce minor legal T&Cs hoping you won’t notice. Your risk of signing a suboptimal contract is highest under last-week time pressure. Also, if something truly stalls (board approvals, etc.), you could pass the expiration – which weakens your leverage drastically if you still need the service. | Be prepared to execute – or walk. In the final week, you should be either ready to sign on your terms or genuinely willing to say no. Make sure all internal approvals are lined up so you can pull the trigger. Conversely, if SAP hasn’t met your must-haves, be ready to use your contingency plan (e.g. a short-term extension of the old deal, or even downtime if tolerable) rather than caving. Ironically, having the guts to not sign can sometimes yield a phone call in 24 hours with that last 5% off. But use this only if you’re truly prepared for the fallout. |
Conclusion from timing benchmarks: The biggest jumps in discount often come in the last 3–4 months, especially the last quarter. We often see total discounts double from the initial quote to the final agreement. But chasing the last percent in the final days can be dangerous if you’re not operationally ready to push past the deadline.
The optimal strategy is to start early, maintain pressure throughout (with alternatives and internal alignment in place), and capitalize on SAP’s tendency to offer the best concessions at quarter-end – without putting yourself in a position where you must sign regardless.
Deals opened 6–9 months before expiry yield the steepest concessions. Use time as your ally: a drawn-out negotiation where you control the timeline beats a firefight in SAP’s favor.
Table 10: Competitive Leverage – Impact on Discount – What signals or tactics can earn you extra percentage points, and how can they backfire if mismanaged?
Leverage Signal (How you apply pressure) | Median Extra Discount Won | Notes on Usage | Backfires If… |
---|---|---|---|
Third-Party Hosting RFP Showing you might host SAP elsewhere (AWS/Azure or another MSP) | +5–10% off contract value (often via reduced infrastructure cost) | This is one of the most credible threats: it directly challenges SAP’s bundled revenue. By soliciting bids from cloud providers or integrators to run your SAP environment, you create a price benchmark. We’ve seen SAP drop their hosting fees significantly to match or beat an AWS+partner combo. Even a hint of moving to hyperscaler self-managed can jolt SAP to sharpen their pencil on infrastructure and even overall subscription price. | …you’re not actually capable of following through. If SAP calls your bluff and says “OK, go ahead and run it yourself,” and you have no plan, you lose leverage and trust. Also can backfire if brought up too late – SAP might not have time (or willingness) to react with a new quote if you spring this in final days. Use it early enough to influence pricing discussions. |
Migration Delay / Staying on ECC Implying you might postpone cloud move | +5% (increased discount or equivalent value in services) | This plays on SAP’s 2027 ECC support deadline pressure. If you say, “We’re prepared to stick with ECC a bit longer,” it signals to SAP that the cloud deal isn’t a sure thing. Often SAP will counter with better terms to entice you now – e.g. extra discount, or funding for migration services, etc. Even a modest delay threat (like “we’ll wait another year”) can yield something like a one-time credit or price reduction to make jumping now more attractive. | …SAP truly believes you’ll delay indefinitely. If they think you’re not a committed buyer at all, they might deprioritize you (focus on other deals) or call your bluff and let the deadline pressure fall on you instead. Use this tactic to get incentives, but balance it: you want SAP to still work hard to close you now. Also, don’t overplay it if internally you know you can’t stay on ECC (e.g. board mandates cloud now) – that could corner you. |
C-Suite Escalation Involving your CEO/CFO with SAP’s top execs | +10% (often in form of an improved overall package) | A well-timed call or meeting from your CFO/CEO to their SAP counterpart can break logjams. When SAP’s sales team hears that their board-level contact is engaged, suddenly previously “impossible” concessions become possible. We’ve seen total discount move from, say, 40% to 50% after a CEO-to-CEO call sealing the deal, often with some extras thrown in (e.g. extended payment terms, additional support). It essentially raises the negotiation to a strategic level. Use this when you’ve reached the limits of your day-to-day negotiators. | …it’s used as a bluff or without preparation. If your exec engages but isn’t firm on asks, SAP might just do soft relationship talk and not give much. Or if your team and exec aren’t aligned, you risk undercutting your negotiators (SAP might bypass your team thinking “the CFO just wants it done”). Also, escalating too early can strain the account team relations. Save it for when you need a final push on major sticking points (price, commitments). It should be clear to SAP that the top exec isn’t going to waste time – they expect SAP to say yes to the request. If SAP senses it’s just a tactic with no real walk-away threat behind it, it may not yield results. |
Using Leverage: Always Have a Credible Story. Whether it’s an RFP or an internal decision memo to wait, there should be evidence (even if just internal) that you can do what you say. And remember, leverage tactics are not one-size-fits-all; they work best in combination.
For instance, you might float an RFP (to hit their technical team) and concurrently let slip that the CFO is skeptical about ROI (to hit their sales leadership). The multifaceted pressure gives SAP’s negotiators reason to go fight for a better deal on your behalf internally.
Plays That Win in 2025
Bringing all these benchmarks and tactics together, here’s a playbook for negotiating (or renegotiating) your SAP ERP Private Cloud agreement in 2025.
These are practical steps and checklists to use before, during, and after the negotiation, plus red flags to watch for and target outcomes by deal size.
Checklist — Before Engaging SAP:
- Set Your Target & Walk Away: Define your benchmark-based targets for discounts and key terms before talks begin. E.g., “We aim for ~40% off; anything below 30% is unacceptable.” Get executive buy-in on these thresholds and a clear walk-away plan if SAP won’t meet them.
- Line Up Alternatives: Approve a credible Plan B (even if you hope not to use it). This could be issuing a hosting RFP to compare costs, preparing to extend your current system for a year, or evaluating another vendor’s solution. Having an alternative gives you confidence and leverage.
- Choose Contract Length Strategically: Decide internally the pros/cons of a 3-year vs a 5-year (or other) term. Shorter term = more flexibility, but likely higher annual price. Longer term = potentially big discount, but lock-in risk. Know your preference and limits (e.g., “We’ll only do 5 years if price is X and with escape clauses; otherwise 3 years max.”).
- Identify Must-Have Clauses: Pre-agreeon your non-negotiables on flexibility and protections. For example, “We must have a true-down option and a price cap on renewal. If SAP rejects those, we escalate or walk.” Having this list vetted by legal/leadership ahead of time prevents caving under pressure later.
Checklist — In the Room (Negotiation Table Tactics):
- Anchor Discussions in Data, Not Anecdotes: Start discussions grounded in benchmark numbers. Instead of reacting to SAP’s stories (“others are paying more”), bring the conversation back to facts: “Industry deals of this size get ~50% off – that’s our expectation.” It keeps talks grounded and positions you as an informed buyer.
- Deconstruct the Bundle: Don’t let SAP hide behind complexity. Insist on discussing the components (licenses, infrastructure, and services). For instance, “Let’s discuss the infrastructure portion – how does this compare to market rates? We can source differently if needed.” By separating pieces, you gain negotiation wiggle room and clarity on costs.
- Trade Length for Value: If SAP pushes for a longer term or broader scope, make it a give-and-take. “We could consider 5 years (or adding that extra module), but only if we get X% more off and a no-increase guarantee.” Use the levers you’re willing to concede as bargaining chips rather than giving them for free.
- Resist Deadline Pressure: SAP will likely mention quarter-end urgency or claim that “this offer expires if not signed by Friday.” Stay calm and refer back to your requirements: “We’re prepared to move quickly, but only once the terms align with our benchmarks and needs.” Never let the ticking clock force you to accept a bad deal – if needed, be ready to let a quarter pass. SAP’s urgency is their problem, not yours, until your conditions are met.
Red Flags – Watch Out for These in Proposals:
- Below-Median Discounts: If the discount SAP offers is notably below the median for your spend band (see Benchmark Set 1), that’s a glaring red flag. Example: you’re a $15M/year client and SAP’s giving 20% off on a 5-year deal (when the median is ~35%). This indicates either they’re low-balling or you haven’t applied enough pressure. Do not settle; counter with data or escalate.
- No Price Caps or Protections: An offer with no mention of price increase caps (on subscription or renewal) is a dangerous sign. It likely means SAP expects to raise your fees later. Similarly, the absence of any flexibility clauses (true-down, etc.) means all the risk is on you. Don’t sign a one-sided deal where you bear all uncertainty.
- Bundling “Bloatware”: Be wary if the proposal bundles in a lot of “free” extras – e.g., an SAP Business Network starter, extra modules you didn’t ask for, tons of BTP credits. These can bloat the scope, and later SAP might charge when the “free” threshold is exceeded. If you see many bells and whistles you didn’t plan on, question them. It’s a red flag that the deal might be artificially padded to justify a higher price (or to lock you into more SAP dependence).
- Opaque Pricing or Omission: If SAP won’t give a breakdown or simply states a giant lump sum, that’s a problem. Lack of transparency is a red flag; it makes it impossible to compare or optimize. Insist on clarity – you can’t negotiate what you can’t see.
- Aggressive Sales Tactics: Finally, any tactic, such as “This is non-negotiable, all our customers sign this” or the sudden appearance of new terms at the last minute (“oh by the way, there’s a 5% annual uplift we didn’t discuss”) is a red flag. Legitimately competitive deals are achieved through open, albeit tough, negotiation – not pressure and surprise. Call out such tactics and reset the conversation to focus on meeting your defined requirements.
By anticipating these red flags, you can address them head-on: “We noticed the offer doesn’t include a renewal cap – that’s a must for us.” or “These additional components are nice, but we didn’t budget for them – let’s remove them and focus on core needs to reduce cost.” It shows SAP that you’re diligently reviewing every line and won’t be easily tricked by packaging.
Table 11: “Good, Better, Best” Negotiation Outcomes by Spend Band (5-Year Term) –
Use this as a scorecard to gauge how well your deal stacks up to benchmarks, and what to aim for in negotiations:
Spend Band | “Good” Outcome <br>(Meets market median) | “Better” Outcome <br>(Exceeds average, solid deal) | “Best” Outcome <br>(Top-quartile deal) |
---|---|---|---|
Band A <$5M/yr | ~20% off list; basic protections. You secure around the median discount for a small deal (~15–20%). Contract is mostly standard, but you got at least one concession (e.g. a modest 5% cap on renewal or a small true-down right). | ~25% off + one strong clause. Discount in mid-20s%. You also negotiate a notable flexibility, like swap rights or a no-increase first renewal. Overall, you’re doing better than many peers of similar size. | ~30%+ off; high flexibility despite size. You achieve ~30% or more off – top quartile for this band. Plus, you obtained big-company clauses (true-down, swap, price lock). This is rare for Band A, indicating you leveraged something unique (e.g. niche competitive bid or a strategic relationship). |
Band B $5–10M/yr | ~25% off; standard T&Cs. In the mid-20s% discount – decent, around median. Terms largely SAP standard, perhaps with one minor improvement (e.g. 10% true-down at renewal). | ~35% off; added protections. Closer to one-third off. You likely got a true-down or a better-than-normal price lock (say 0% increase for 4 years). The deal is materially better than average – a strong negotiation showing. | ~40%+ off; well-protected deal. Cracked 40% off or better. You also locked in critical clauses: e.g. a 15% true-down and a 3% renewal cap. This outcome rivals what much larger clients get – an excellent job ensuring you’re not overpaying and not overexposed. |
Band C $10–20M/yr | ~30% off; some basics included. Around 30% discount, hitting median. Likely included at least a renewal cap or the like, but some flexibility might still be missing. You got a fair price but there’s room for more if leveraged. | ~40% off; key flex terms added. Discount around 40%. You secured one or two strong clauses (e.g. 10–15% true-down, swap rights) and limited any open-ended exposure (like indexation capped at CPI or 3%). A very solid outcome covering both price and terms. | ~50% off; enterprise-grade deal. Half off list price, which is top quartile for mid-large deals. Plus, you negotiated like an $50M client: multi-faceted protections (true-down, swaps, no CPI increases, etc.). This “best” scenario likely required creating a competitive atmosphere and executive-level negotiation. |
Band D $20–40M/yr | ~35% off; protections light. Mid-30s% discount (median-ish). You might only have basic renewal protection or none, and minimal flexibility. This is okay, but on a large base it means money left on the table. Aim higher. | ~45% off; core protections in place. Approaching 50% off. You have at least true-down or swap rights and a reasonable cap on future increases. This is a commendable result: you’ve beaten the average and guarded against major risks. | ~55% off; full suite of flex & caps. North of 50% off – an outstanding price. Moreover, you basically got a “reference deal” contract: true-down 15–20%, swap rights across major modules, perhaps a price lock for an extended term, and no sneaky indexation. This is an ideal Band D outcome that sets you up for cost stability. |
Band E >$40M/yr | ~40% off; standard large deal terms. Maybe around 40% off – surprisingly low given your clout, but some companies do settle there. Standard terms (limited flexibility). SAP likely yielded on volume but you might have accepted their paper on everything else. There’s scope to do much better. | ~50% off; important extras secured. Half off list give or take – a strong result. You also ensured you have true-down rights (probably significant, like 20%) and perhaps special clauses (e.g. co-termination of some legacy contracts, or a tailored SLA). You used your weight well, achieving a deal many would envy. | 60–70% off; “lighthouse” deal. You achieved a truly exceptional discount and terms that SAP might only give to marquee clients: on the order of 60%+ off. Your contract likely has custom carve-outs, full price protections for the term and beyond, and flexibility to adjust as you go. This is the kind of deal SAP salespeople fear because it sets a precedent – and you obtained it by leveraging everything (competition, exec pressure, massive volume). Congratulations on a category-leading outcome. |
Use this table to benchmark your negotiation progress.
For example, if you’re a Band D client and SAP’s offer is 30% off with no special terms, you’re in “red flag” territory – that’s not even a good outcome. Push into the Better/Best column.
Conversely, if you’re seeing numbers in the Best column, you know you’ve maximized a lot of value – just double-check for any hidden caveats.
How to trade off Discount % vs Flexibility vs Term: Not every deal will hit “Best” on all fronts – negotiation is about balance.
Here are a few guiding principles:
- If flexibility matters more (e.g,. you anticipate downsizing or uncertain usage), you might accept a slightly lower discount in exchange for strong true-down and swap rights. The savings from not overpaying for unused capacity can outweigh a 5% higher upfront price.
- If price is king and budgets are tight, push the discount hard – but remember to not give away future protections. Often, offering a longer term is the lever to get a bigger discount: “We’ll do 5 years, but you give us 50% off instead of 40%.” Only do that if you also cap the renewal or have an out, so you’re not hostage after Year 5.
- Term length vs flexibility: A shorter term (3 years) gives you a natural opportunity to renegotiate sooner (flexibility by timeframe). A longer term locks in price (good if it’s low) but reduces flexibility to change providers or models. If you go long, bake flexibility into the contract. If SAP won’t budge on that, maybe opt for a shorter term despite a lesser discount – you maintain leverage by keeping the renewal date in play.
- Use protections as currency: Sometimes you can trade a clause for a price and vice versa. Example: “Okay, we will drop our ask for mid-term benchmarking if you agree to a 10% larger upfront discount.” Or “We can live with a 3% escalator, but then you must give a unilateral renewal at that rate for two more years.” Think creatively – almost everything is negotiable if you pair it with something else.
Remember, a successful negotiation isn’t just about the lowest price; it’s about securing the best sustainable deal. A rock-bottom price that cripples you with inflexibility or future hikes is a pyrrhic victory. Aim for a well-rounded outcome.
Renewal = Reset: When it comes to SAP cloud, renewal time is your chance to reset the playing field. Approach it like a new deal, not an automatic extension. Here’s how to capitalize on renewals:
- Reassess and Reduce: Use actual usage data from the previous term to adjust your numbers. If you paid for 1,000 users but only ever had 800 active, don’t renew 1,000 just because you had them. Reduce the commit to real-world levels (or even a bit below, if you plan optimizations). This is where that true-down clause pays off – even if you didn’t have one, you can still negotiate down if usage was lower.
- Repricing Triggers: If your contract doesn’t allow mid-term repricing, ensure that it is built into the renewal. And if your business changed (e.g., divestitures, new acquisitions), bring those to the table for repricing. Essentially, everything is back on the table at renewal. If cloud costs per unit have decreased in the market since your last deal, you should be renewing at a lower unit price, not a higher one.
- Drop the Deadweight: Treat non-core or low-value modules differently. Ideally, carve them out of the main renewal. Either put them on separate, short-term contracts or convert them to optional add-ons that can be toggled. For instance, if you hardly used that SAP analytics component, see if you can renew it for only a year or drop it entirely rather than rolling it into a 5-year renewal.
- Ramp with Reality: If your initial term overshot (or undershot) in ramp-up, restructure the new term accordingly. Perhaps you signed a flat deal last time, but only needed full volume in year 3. This time, consider a ramped structure so you pay less in years 1 and 2. Conversely, if you know you’ll expand later, negotiate now for those future units at a favorable rate (even if you commit to add them in year 2 or 3).
- Don’t Auto-Renew: Above all, never let a renewal become a rubber stamp. SAP may present a renewal quote as if it has already been decided. You should counter-propose as if it’s a fresh deal – because for you, it effectively is an opportunity to fix whatever wasn’t ideal in the last contract.
The renewal is your chance to correct course and inject any missed protections. Yes, you’ll have less leverage than when you were a new logo sale, but you do have the power of being an existing customer who can cause churn statistics if unhappy. Use that – make SAP earn your renewal, just as they had to earn your initial signature.
Negotiation Scorecard (1-Page Summary) – It’s useful to boil your plan down to a concise scorecard that you can share internally (and even externally as talking points) without revealing your bottom line.
Here’s a template:
- Spend Band: ____
- Base Discount Target: Median __% | Stretch __%
- Flexibility Clauses: True-down ≥ __% ; Swap rights: Yes/No (circle) ; Re-rate/Benchmark trigger: __ (Y/N or specific condition)
- Price Protection: Annual increase cap ≤ __% for __ years (or “None – fixed price”)
- Timing Plan: Kickoff by T–__ (months) ; Aim to sign by T–__ ; Align with SAP Q__ (Q3/Q4?) end
- Competitive Signal: (e.g. “Will do RFP with Azure”, “Prepared to extend ECC support 1 year”) ________________
- Walk-Away Conditions: (What would make you walk – e.g. “If <30% discount or no cap on renewal, we delay project.”) ________________
Fill this in and keep it as your north star. It ensures everyone on your side – from analysts to the CIO – stays aligned on the goals and limits throughout the negotiation chaos.
FAQ – SAP ERP Private Cloud Benchmarks
Q: What’s a realistic base discount for a 5-year private cloud deal in 2025? (By deal size)
A: It varies by your spend tier. For a small deal (<$5M/yr), a 20% discount is a realistic target (median), with top deals achieving 30%. For a mid-sized commitment ($10M/yr), consider a discount of 30–40% (median ~35%). Large enterprise deals ($20M+/yr) commonly land in the 40–50% range, and really aggressive negotiations push into the 50% range. The very largest, strategic deals have seen discounts of 60% or more on a 5-year term – but those are outliers. The key is to benchmark where you stand and aim for at least the 75th percentile, especially if you have any leverage. (Remember, these discounts are off SAP’s inflated list prices – SAP expects to give large percentages, so don’t be shy about double-digit demands.)
Q: How much more discount can we get by using leverage tactics like a competitive bid or timing?
A: Leverage tactics absolutely can move the needle. For instance, timing your deal for SAP’s quarter or year-end can add roughly 5–10% extra discount – we’ve seen final-week “flash discounts” of that magnitude when SAP needs the sale in Q4. Running a third-party hosting RFP or presenting a credible alternative often pressures SAP to match pricing – easily another 5–10% off the infrastructure component, which might translate to ~5% of the total contract. C-suite engagement (such as a CFO call) or referencing board-level cost mandates can also yield an additional 5–15% in value, either as a greater discount or added extras, because it signals to SAP that the deal’s approval is on the line. All together, a well-leveraged negotiation could turn, say, an initial 25% off proposal into a 45% off final deal. It’s the difference between a standard discount and a standout discount. Just be sure your leverage is credible – the gains we’re citing come when SAP believes you have options and authority to say “no.”
Q: Which flexibility clauses should we insist on the most?
A: True-down rights are probably number one – you need the ability to adjust down if your usage is overestimated. Without it, you’re locked paying for shelfware. Next, price increase protection (indexation caps or fixed renewal terms) is vital – insist that any annual hike is capped (ideally 0–3% at most) and push for a renewal price cap too. Swap rights are also very valuable: they ensure that if one part of SAP isn’t used, you can repurpose the investment to another area. And if you’re signing a longer deal, a mid-term benchmarking or repricing clause is a strong ask – it’s harder to get, but even a soft clause here helps keep SAP in check. In summary: True-down, price cap, swaps, and if you can, benchmark/adjust. Those address the biggest risks (overbuying and overpaying over time). At minimum, go for true-down and a cap on any increases – those alone can save you a fortune later.
Q: When during the negotiation do we typically see the biggest price movement?
A: Typically, in the final 2-3 months leading up to your deadline. Early on (6+ months out), SAP might throw a small bone, but nothing major. As you enter the last quarter before renewal, especially around 90 days out, they start sweetening the pot – that’s often when you get a second quote, perhaps 5–10 points better after some pushback. The biggest jumps often come in the last 4-6 weeks. As quarter-end or the contract end date looms, SAP’s concessions peak – they’ll bring out those special approvals for an extra discount or two. We’ve seen stalemates suddenly break in the final week with an extra 5% off or a last-minute incentive once the rep has senior management breathing down their neck. Of course, you have to be careful not to cut it too close – but generally, SAP’s “best and final” tends to literally come at the end. Plan your negotiation timeline to exploit this: start early, but expect the significant moves late, and be prepared to go down to the wire if needed (with all your internal approvals ready to execute quickly on a good final offer).
Q: Any difference in approach between a net-new SAP Private Cloud deal and a renewal of an existing contract?
A: Yes, the dynamics differ. In a net-new deal, SAP is in “acquisition mode” – you’ll see big incentive programs (like those migration credits, or aggressive discounts) because SAP wants to win your business and showcase cloud growth. You have maximum leverage before you’re a customer. In a renewal, you’re already in the boat – SAP knows switching off their cloud is painful for you. They might initially offer less stellar terms, assuming inertia will carry the deal. That’s why, in renewals, you must manufacture leverage (even more so than in a new deal). For example, start the renewal process early and make noise about evaluating alternatives (whether it’s moving to another cloud, bringing in a competitor for part of the solution, or even considering reverting to on-prem if that’s viable). Also, use your actual usage data as a weapon: “We didn’t use 15% of what we paid for, so we expect a 15% reduction in volume (or equivalent price cut) going forward.” One strategic tip: engage SAP’s competition even if you’re not going to fully switch – sometimes just having a credible proposal from, say, Oracle or Workday for certain edge components can scare SAP into a better renewal offer. In short, treat a renewal with the same gravity as a new deal. The good news is that you now know your usage and value better, so you can negotiate from a position of data. The bad news: SAP knows you likely won’t drop them entirely. So your job is to create enough pressure and alternatives at renewal time to simulate the competitive tension of a new deal. Many customers also find it effective to involve executive sponsors in renewals early (because SAP’s account team will pay attention to retaining a customer, and you might get corporate involved to ensure the renewal doesn’t become a customer satisfaction issue). Finally, don’t forget to push for cleanup in the renewal – any term that was unfavorable in the initial contract is your chance to rectify it. So go down the checklist: if you lacked a true-down before, demand it now; if you got hit with a surprise increase, cap it now; etc. A renewal should be a renegotiation, not a rubber stamp.
Read about our SAP Contract Negotiation Service.