SAP Pricing and Discounting Tactics for CIOs and Procurement Leaders

SAP Pricing and Discounting Tactics for CIOs and Procurement Leaders

Introduction

Enterprise software investments in SAP are among large organizations’ most significant IT expenditures. CIOs and procurement leaders face complex pricing models that can make forecasting costs challenging and negotiating favorable terms challenging.

Understanding how SAP pricing works across major product lines – from core ERP (S/4HANA) to cloud offerings like SuccessFactors, Ariba, and the comprehensive RISE with SAP bundle – is essential for avoiding hidden costs and securing the best value.

This article examines SAP’s pricing structure, licensing metrics, common pitfalls that drive costs, and proven discounting and negotiation strategies.

The goal is to equip CIOs and sourcing teams with insights to optimize SAP license spending while maintaining compliance and flexibility.

SAP Pricing Models by Product Category

SAP’s product portfolio spans on-premises software and cloud services, each with its own licensing model.

Below, we explain pricing for four key categories: SAP S/4HANA, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP Ariba, and RISE with SAP.

SAP S/4HANA (ERP) Pricing

SAP S/4HANA is SAP’s flagship ERP system, and its pricing depends on the deployment model: traditional on-premise licensing vs. cloud subscription.

• On-Premise (Perpetual License): Customers purchase a perpetual license for S/4HANA and deploy it in their own data center (or hosting of choice). This is akin to buying a product outright. Pricing is largely user-based – organizations must license every individual who uses the system (named user licensing). SAP offers different user categories (e.g., Professional, Functional, Employee Self-Service, etc.) with varying capabilities; the more comprehensive the access, the higher the cost. A Professional User license, for example, costs significantly more than an Employee Self-Service license. In addition to users, certain S/4HANA functional add-ons or “engines” might be licensed by other metrics (for instance, an industry-specific module might be based on company revenue or transactions processed). After the upfront license fee, the customer pays annual maintenance and support (typically ~20–22% of the license price) to receive updates and support. This maintenance fee generally increases by a small percentage each year as part of SAP’s standard policy. The on-premise model means a high initial CapEx outlay, but you retain the software indefinitely (even if you stop paying support, you can still use the last version obtained). Infrastructure and operations costs are the customer’s responsibility.
• Cloud Subscription: SAP also offers S/4HANA in cloud-based models (for example, the public cloud edition of S/4HANA or the private cloud via SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud). Instead of buying licenses, you pay an annual or monthly subscription fee in this model. This fee typically includes the software usage rights, hosting/infrastructure, and standard support in one bundle. Subscription pricing is often measured by the number of users or by a unified metric called Full User Equivalents (FUE). FUE is essentially a credit system where different types of users count for different weights – for example, 1 Professional user might equal 1.0 FUE.
  In contrast, a lighter “Employee” user might count as 0.1 FUE. A contract might specify a total FUE entitlement rather than fixed named users, allowing some flexibility in mixing user types. The cloud subscription model shifts the cost to an OpEx stream (recurring payments) rather than a one-time purchase. One important aspect is that if you stop paying the subscription, your rights to use the software end, so it’s a continuous commitment. For substantial cloud deals, SAP often requires a minimum contract term (e.g., 3 or 5 years)

  .
• RISE with SAP (Bundled Offering): RISE with SAP is a special subscription bundle introduced in 2021 that deserves its discussion (see the RISE with SAP Pricing section below). In brief, RISE packages S/4HANA Cloud (usually private or public editions), the necessary platform and infrastructure (on a hyperscaler of SAP’s choice), and additional cloud services into a single contract. Pricing for RISE is typically based on the FUE metric as well, with SAP often setting a minimum FUE purchase threshold. RISE simplifies procurement (one contract and invoice for software, infrastructure, and basic services) but can reduce flexibility since all components are tied together.

Key Points for S/4HANA: Whether on-premise or cloud, ensure you understand how user counts and any extra metrics (like database size, orders, revenue, etc.) factor into the cost.

On-premise licensing gives more control but has hefty support fees and infrastructure costs. At the same time, cloud subscription offers faster time-to-value and less IT overhead, but at the expense of a perpetual pay model.

Importantly, watch out for Digital Access licensing in S/4HANA – this is SAP’s approach to handle indirect usage (when non-SAP applications or external users access data in S/4HANA). SAP now offers a Digital Access license based on documents accessed/created (covering invoices, sales orders, etc.) to account for indirect access. If you do not explicitly license this and have third-party systems interfacing with SAP, you could face compliance issues under the older “indirect user” rules.

Many S/4HANA customers opt to negotiate a Digital Access bundle to mitigate the risk of future audit penalties related to indirect use.

SAP SuccessFactors (HR SaaS) Pricing

SAP SuccessFactors is a cloud-based Human Capital Management suite covering core HR, talent management, learning, payroll, and more. SuccessFactors uses a subscription licensing model primarily based on the number of users or employees as a pure SaaS offering.

Pricing for SuccessFactors is typically quoted as a price per user per month (or per year), with different modules licensed separately. For example, you might license Employee Central (core HR) for all employees and additionally license modules like Performance & Goals or Recruiting for specific user populations.

SAP uses tiered pricing bands based on the total number of users. There are usually predefined bands (e.g., 1–2,000 users, 2,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, and so on up to >100k) where the per-user price drops as you move into higher tiers.

This means a large enterprise with 20,000 employees will have a lower unit price than a company with 500 employees, though the overall cost is higher due to volume. All SuccessFactors subscriptions are time-limited (commonly 1-year or multi-year terms) and must be renewed to continue service.

Additionally, SuccessFactors may offer special license types for certain kinds of users. For instance, a “functional” user license (with limited or no direct access, used for contingent workers or occasional use) might be cheaper than a full standard user license.

SAP also sells bundles – e.g., an Employee Central bundle that includes some integration middleware or a Talent Management package combining several talent modules, which can be more cost-effective than picking modules à la carte.

When planning SuccessFactors licensing, an organization should forecast its employee/user count over the contract period because exceeding a tier (due to growth in headcount) can increase costs.

It’s wise to negotiate the ability to true-up additional users at the same discounted rate or to lock in pricing for additional bands in advance if you expect significant growth.

SAP Ariba (Procurement) Pricing

SAP Ariba offers procurement and supply-chain collaboration solutions, and its pricing model is a hybrid of user-based subscriptions and consumption-based fees.

Ariba’s modules (such as Buying and Invoicing, Sourcing, Contracts, Supplier Lifecycle Management, and the Ariba Network) each have licensing considerations:

• Named User Subscriptions: Many Ariba modules are sold per internal user. For instance, Ariba Sourcing or Supplier Management might require licenses for each procurement professional or supplier manager using the system. These are typically sold in bundles of seats (e.g., a 5-user package) with volume discounts if you need more users. Ensure you license enough users for all the roles (buyers, approvers, etc.) that will use the software. There may be base bundles and then additional users on top.
• Spend or Transaction-Based Fees: Uniquely, Ariba’s procure-to-pay modules often incorporate a metric based on spend throughput or document count. Instead of charging solely by named users, SAP might price Ariba Buying & Invoicing by the total procurement spend processed through the system annually. For example, the subscription cost might be quoted as a percentage of annual spending managed via Ariba (with higher spend tiers incurring higher absolute fees but lower percentage rates). A typical structure could be 0.25% of the first $100 million in spending, 0.15% of the next tranche, etc., with tiered decreases as volume grows. Sometimes, pricing can be based on several documents (like the number of purchase orders or invoices per year). This model aligns cost with actual usage, but if your company’s purchasing volume grows, the fees can scale up accordingly. It’s important to negotiate reasonable tier thresholds and understand caps so that an unexpected spike in spending doesn’t lead to out-of-control costs.
• Ariba Network Supplier Fees: A significant portion of Ariba’s model involves the SAP Business Network (formerly Ariba Network), which connects buyers and suppliers. SAP charges suppliers transaction fees when they transact above certain volumes on the network. For example, a supplier might pay around 0.15% of the invoice value for each transaction with a given customer, capped at a yearly maximum (often a cap like $20,000 per supplier-buyer relationship per year). These fees are on the supplier side, but procurement leaders must be aware of them – if your suppliers feel the fees are too high, they may resist onboarding to the network or push back costs to you indirectly. In large enterprise deals, buyers sometimes negotiate to cover supplier network fees or get a private network deal to alleviate supplier friction. While this fee primarily impacts suppliers, it’s a hidden ecosystem cost that can affect the success of your Ariba rollout, so it should factor into your overall cost considerations and supplier communication.

Key Points for Ariba: Always clarify which metric drives your costs for each module – users, spend volume, documents, or all of the above. Be cautious with spend-based pricing: negotiate the projected spend band realistically and ask what happens if you exceed it (Can you true-up at the same rate? Will there be penalties?).

For Ariba Network fees, understand the policy for your suppliers and consider it part of the total cost of ownership. If you plan a large expansion of Ariba usage (more suppliers or more spending), factor in those variable costs upfront.

RISE with SAP Pricing

RISE with SAP is SAP’s all-in-one offering, combining core ERP (S/4HANA Cloud) with various surrounding services under a single contract. It is often pitched as “business transformation as a service.”

From a pricing perspective, RISE packages many separate components—software licenses, infrastructure hosting, technical managed services, and even SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) consumption credits—for a subscription fee.

RISE with SAP is typically structured around the Full User Equivalent (FUE) metric for S/4HANA Cloud, similar to other cloud licensing. When you sign a RISE contract, you commit to a certain number of FUEs (which correspond to a mix of user types and roles using the system).

The subscription fee you pay will depend on the number of FUEs and the level of service (for example, the size of systems, add-on services, disaster recovery, etc., might influence the price). SAP often has minimums – for instance, 40 FUEs for a private cloud edition, meaning even if you have a small user count, you might pay for the minimum threshold.

The RISE pricing includes the underlying infrastructure (compute, storage on a hyperscaler cloud like Azure, AWS, or Google, managed by SAP) and usually SAP’s basic application management services. You do not pay separately for an SAP S/4HANA license or maintenance – it’s all rolled into the RISE subscription.

SAP’s value proposition is that this single contract can be 15-20% lower TCO than buying everything à la carte due to efficiencies and included benefits (like quicker deployments, credits for technology platform usage, etc.).

However, CIOs should be cautious with this comparison: the TCO advantage may only materialize if you fully use all components and stay within the provided limits. In some cases, over a horizon of 4-5 years, RISE can become more expensive than a traditional model if a company could run an on-premise or hosted system at a lower incremental cost.

One reason is that RISE locks in recurring costs and often includes annual escalators (the subscription fee might rise by a fixed percentage each year or at renewal).

Additionally, the all-in-one nature means less flexibility – you cannot easily drop a component (say, switch your infrastructure hosting to another provider independently) or reduce user counts during the contract term. Essentially, RISE trades flexibility for simplicity.

When considering RISE, treat it as a package: evaluate the cost of RISE vs. staying on traditional licensing + cloud hosting. Perform a detailed 5-year TCO model for both scenarios, accounting for everything (software, hardware, or cloud infrastructure, SAP support costs, internal support staff, potential growth in users or data, etc.).

This will help reveal if SAP’s offered RISE price saves money or is just shifting how you pay. Also, if negotiating RISE, pay attention to terms around scaling: Can you add users if needed at a predetermined rate?

What happens at renewal after the initial term? Is there price protection, or could costs jump? Being clear on these will help avoid surprises later.

SAP’s Price List Methodology and Licensing Metrics

SAP maintains a massive price list catalog that defines list prices for all its products and licenses. This price list underpins how quotes are built, but in practice, most customers never pay the pure list price—it’s the starting point for negotiation.

Understanding SAP’s price list methodology and the common licensing metrics used will give you a leg up in deciphering quotes and negotiating effectively.

Licensing Metrics: SAP uses a variety of licensing metrics depending on the product or module. Broadly, they fall into a few categories:

• User-Based Metrics: As discussed, many SAP products (especially the core ERP and cloud apps) are priced per user. In on-premise terms, these are “Named Users,” and for cloud subscriptions, often “per user per month/year.” Users can be human individuals or system/service accounts that access SAP. The user metric is straightforward, but SAP complicates it with different types of users (each type having a different price). For example, in S/4HANA on-prem, common user types include Professional User, Limited Professional, Employee, Developer, etc., each with a defined scope of usage rights. A customer must assign each user the appropriate license type and ensure it’s sufficient for their activities. User metrics are also common in SuccessFactors (employee count) and certain Ariba modules (procurement staff).
• Consumption or Volume Metrics: Many SAP packages (“engines” or line-of-business solutions) use metrics tied to business volume or technical capacity. Examples include annual revenue (for some industry solutions), number of employees (for HR or payroll engines, aside from the user count itself), number of orders or amount of spend (for procurement solutions like Ariba or SAP Fieldglass), barrels of oil produced (for an oil & gas industry module), or database size/CPU (for SAP HANA database licensing which can be based on memory volume or CPU cores). These metrics align the price with the scale of usage. They often come in tiers or blocks – for instance, a license might cover up to X metric amount, and you pay more to go beyond that. The price list specifies the unit or tier pricing for these metrics. If your business grows (more employees, transactions, etc.), you may need to purchase additional blocks or move into a higher metric tier.
• Flat Fee or Server-Based: A few cases involve flat fees or server-based licensing. For example, some older SAP products might have a flat license fee per installation or server. If licensed separately, SAP HANA often uses a capacity metric (like per 64GB of memory license). With the push to the cloud, these models are less common for new products, but existing installations might still use them.

Price List Structure: SAP’s official price list is not public, but customers and partners with access can see it. It essentially provides a catalog price for each SKU and metric unit. For example, it might say that an S/4HANA Professional User is €€€ per user, an Employee User is € per user, or Ariba per $1M of spending is $X.

These are baseline prices. However, SAP almost always applies a discount in real sales scenarios. The size of the discount can vary widely (20%, 50%, or even 90% in some cases for large strategic deals) depending on factors like deal size, competition, and sales incentives.

The price list also often has built-in volume discounts at certain thresholds, meaning if you buy a larger quantity of the same item, the unit list price might be somewhat lower. (SAP might also simply apply a larger discount for bigger purchases; functionally, it’s similar.)

For example, SuccessFactors had tiered bands where the list price per user dropped in higher bands. Another example: SAP Named User licenses could historically be discounted by bundling more users in one go.

Understanding a Quote: When SAP provides a pricing proposal, it usually lists each line item with a quantity, a unit list price, and then a discount percentage and resulting net price. It is crucial to ask for this level of detail (and not accept only a lump-sum figure)—you want transparency to see how each component is priced and discounted.

This helps you identify which items are especially high-cost and where to focus negotiations. It also prevents SAP from hiding the real price of individual components by bundling.

For instance, if you are buying S/4HANA licenses and some add-ons like SAP Ariba in one deal, SAP might show an overall discount. Insist on a breakdown: one item might be heavily discounted while another is barely discounted, skewing the value. Ensure that the discount is applied evenly or where you need it most.

Finally, note that SAP’s list prices can change year to year (usually upward). If you have a price list from last year, the current year’s list might be a few percent higher due to inflation adjustments. When negotiating long-term agreements, consider securing price holds or caps on increases for future purchases against the current price list.

Common Pricing Pitfalls and Hidden Cost Drivers

Navigating SAP’s pricing isn’t just about the upfront quote; several pitfalls and hidden cost drivers can inflate the total cost over time.

Here are some of the most common ones to watch for:

• Annual Uplift Fees and Escalators: SAP contracts often include built-in price escalations. For on-premises licenses, the annual maintenance fee (~22% of license cost) typically increases by a small percentage each year (historically around 2-3% annually). In recent years, SAP has even tied support fee increases to inflation indices in each region, with caps (often up to 5% per year). Similarly, cloud subscription agreements may have an automatic uplift clause – for instance, your subscription fee might rise by 3% each year of the term, or SAP might reserve the right to increase prices at renewal. If unchecked, these compounded increases can turn a manageable cost in year one into a budget-buster by year three or four. Always identify if an automatic uplift is in the contract. These are often negotiable – savvy customers negotiate or eliminate them for the initial term. It’s common to push for a price lock for a certain period or a cap (say no more than CPI or a fixed 2% per year). Remember that SAP sales reps may initially insist these uplifts are standard. However, especially for large deals or strategic customers, they often have leeway to freeze or minimize increases to win the business. Failure to address this means you could get caught off-guard by rising costs that were avoidable.
• Indirect Access and Digital Access Costs: So-called indirect access is a notorious SAP licensing pitfall. This occurs when people or systems not directly logged into SAP still interact with SAP data – for example, a third-party e-commerce system pulling order information from SAP or employees accessing SAP data through a non-SAP portal. Traditionally, SAP’s stance was that such access still requires proper licensing (often a named user license for those indirect users or a separate license for the intermediary system), even if those users never log in to SAP directly. This has led to high-profile compliance audits and hefty back-license fees for some companies unaware they were out of compliance. To mitigate the confusion, SAP introduced a new model called Digital Access for S/4HANA: instead of licensing hypothetical users, you license the documents (like sales orders, invoices, etc.) created indirectly. This can be more transparent, but it’s an optional model – customers have to choose to adopt it (potentially trading in some existing license value). Whether you stick with traditional licensing or move to Digital Access, indirect usage can drive significant unexpected costs if not proactively managed. Hidden costs arise if, say, your integration architecture causes thousands of documents to be generated in SAP by external systems – you might suddenly need additional licenses. During negotiations, it’s wise to bring up indirect access. Some customers negotiate a one-time Digital Access license package at a discount or get contractual clarity on what scenarios are covered by existing licenses. The key is not to ignore this area; otherwise, an audit down the road could present you with an ugly surprise bill.
• Shelfware and Overallocation: SAP deals, especially big bundle deals, can lead to shelfware – licenses or subscriptions you purchased but don’t use. This often happens when SAP persuades customers to “buy extra now for future growth” or bundles in additional modules at a discount.” While it might sound like you’re getting more value, if those extra components sit unused, you’ve spent money (and possibly continue paying maintenance or subscription fees) for nothing. For example, a company might buy licenses for a SAP module like Environment Health & Safety or extra SAP Ariba modules as part of an enterprise deal, but never deploy them. Those unused licenses still incur support costs or eat into a budget that could be better used. The hidden cost is the opportunity cost and ongoing fees for unused software. To avoid this, be critical about what you truly need in the foreseeable future. It can be better to pass on a “great discount” for something you won’t use rather than lock yourself into a contract that looks good on paper but wastes money. Always calculate the long-term cost of any bundled addition: if it’s not going to be used in the next year or two, it’s likely not worth even a 90% discount if you have to pay 10% and then yearly support on it. Start your negotiations with a clear scope and resist the pressure to add extras just because they are discounted.
• Support and Maintenance Cost Creeping Up: The SAP support contract is a large ongoing cost for on-premise customers. SAP standard support is pegged as a percentage of your total license value. If you purchase more licenses later, your support base increases accordingly. One hidden dynamic is that if you get a very deep discount on licenses, your maintenance is calculated on the net price you paid (which is good). Still, if you ever need to renew support after lapse or reinstatement, SAP may charge back maintenance plus penalties on the list price. Also, if you try to terminate a portion of your licenses to reduce maintenance, SAP’s policies may not give you a linear reduction. In some cases, they disallow dropping support on the part of the portfolio (you generally must maintain support on all licenses you still use). Furthermore, after a certain period, old software might go into extended support with additional fees (e.g., SAP ECC older versions requiring an extra premium for extended maintenance post mainstream end-of-support). All these factors mean support costs tend to only go upward. As a hidden cost, companies often overlook how much the maintenance will cost after 5 years. Cloud subscriptions don’t have a “separate” maintenance fee, but the renewal of a cloud service plays a similar role – if you want to continue after the initial term, you may face a higher price. To mitigate support cost escalation, some companies consider third-party support providers when SAP software is in stable, legacy mode (though moving to third-party support has implications like losing upgrade rights). At a minimum, during negotiations, try to negotiate caps on support fee increases, and if you’re decommissioning some SAP products, discuss options with SAP on reducing the footprint or converting the value to other areas so you’re not stuck paying for maintenance on something you’ve retired.
• Complex Licensing Metrics and Compliance Risks: Another hidden cost driver is complexity itself. With so many license types and metrics, companies can inadvertently be out of compliance (for example, using software in ways not covered by the purchased metric or misclassifying users). An audit could then force a true-up at the IST price (often without discounts) plus back maintenance. The cost of an audit settlement can be huge and unplanned. Indirect access (as mentioned) is one example, but even straightforward scenarios like having more HR employees in SuccessFactors than you licensed or using an SAP engine beyond the licensed capacity can result in penalties. The pitfall here is not keeping internal usage tracking. Investing in license management processes or tools (SAP provides some measurement tools, and third-party tools exist) is crucial to continuously monitor usage against entitlements. Proactively right-sizing before an audit is far cheaper than after. Also, clarity in the contract (getting definitions and usage rights documented) can prevent misunderstandings that lead to surprise costs.

Actionable Discounting Strategies with SAP

A strong discount on SAP software or cloud services can save millions for large enterprises. SAP’s pricing has room for negotiation, but success requires strategy.

Below are key discounting tactics that CIOs and procurement leaders have used effectively:

• Volume Bundling for Leverage: Aggregating your SAP purchase needs into a single negotiation can significantly improve your bargaining power. SAP’s sales teams are motivated by deal size – larger deals often justify higher discount percentages. Suppose you know that over the next year or two, you’ll need to purchase multiple SAP products or many licenses and negotiate them together as a package rather than piecemeal. Bundling might include combining S/4HANA licenses with SuccessFactors or Ariba in one transaction. The increase in total contract value can push SAP to give a better overall discount. However, be cautious not to bundle unrelated or unneeded products just for a notional discount (as discussed, that leads to shelfware). The best approach is to bundle genuinely planned usage. Within a bundled deal, ensure you still see individual component pricing – so SAP doesn’t, for instance, overcharge on one product and super-discount another. The bundle should yield a blended discount that is strong across the board. Also, consider multi-division or global bundling: if different business units need SAP purchases, coordinate them to present one face to SAP. This prevents SAP from isolating each small deal at a lower discount tier.
• Timing with SAP’s Fiscal Year-End or Quarter-End: Like many enterprise software vendors, SAP has targeted every quarter, especially at year-end. SAP’s fiscal year ends in December, so Q4 (particularly November and December) is often when they are most eager to close deals. You may find that an offer in late Q4 comes with extra incentives or an unusually high discount compared to earlier in the year. Similarly, quarter-end (end of March, June, September, December) can be leverage points. Aligning your negotiation to hit these pressure points can work to your advantage, but it requires planning procurement timelines accordingly. Be careful, though: the rush to close by year-end can also mean less time to thoroughly review terms. Use the timing leverage, but get the Ts & Cs right. If a deal isn’t ready, sometimes walking away and revisiting in the new year is better than rushing into a bad contract. Also, remember that SAP sometimes has special programs or incentives in the latter half of the year (for example, extra discounts for migrating to RISE or adding cloud subscriptions) when they push strategic initiatives to meet annual goals.
• Leverage Competitive Pressure: Even if you are strongly inclined to stick with SAP, introducing credible competition can dramatically improve SAP’s offer. If SAP knows they are up against Oracle, Microsoft, or Workday for a new ERP selection, they will sharpen their pencil. If SAP knows you’re considering best-of-breed alternatives (Coupa, Workday, Oracle Cloud, etc.), they will be more likely to offer concessions for an add-on module like procurement or HR. To leverage this, do your homework on alternative solutions and be transparent about how you are evaluating them. In some cases, running a parallel RFP or proof-of-concept with another vendor can provide tangible quotes or proposals you can show (or at least allude to) in negotiations. Even if you are fairly certain you’ll choose SAP for strategic reasons, letting SAP’s sales team feel the competitive heat is crucial to avoid the “captive customer” pricing. One word of caution: maintain credibility. SAP will recognize bluffing if, for example, you threaten to leave SAP entirely when you have a huge sunk investment. Instead, focus on competition on new modules or migrations. For instance, if you are considering moving to S/4HANA, evaluate Oracle ERP Cloud; if you are considering SuccessFactors, evaluate Workday. Demonstrating that you have viable choices makes SAP more flexible on price and terms. Companies gain double-digit extra discounts when a competitive scenario is in play versus when SAP is the presumptive sole option.
• Secure Future Pricing Protections: A strong discount today can be undermined by price increases tomorrow. That’s why part of the “discounting” strategy is negotiating the future, not just the present. Key protections to seek:
  • Price Holds for Additional Purchases: If you know you’ll need more of a certain license type next year, negotiate to extend the same discount or unit price for a period (e.g., any additional S/4HANA users in the next 24 months will be at the same per-user price as this deal). Otherwise, you might get a good price now, but later additions could be quoted much higher.
  • Renewal Caps: For cloud subscriptions, negotiate a cap on how much the price can increase at renewal after the initial term. For example, stipulate that renewal pricing will not increase more than X% over the prior term’s price. This prevents the scenario where SAP lures you in with a low first-term price and doubles it later.
  • Fixed Maintenance Base: For on-premise, if you’re making a significant license purchase, try to lock the support percentage (it’s normally 22% of the net license – make sure it stays on net, not list) and that the percentage won’t increase in the future. While SAP’s standard support rate is fixed, if you negotiate any custom support terms or discounts on support, ensure it’s documented that SAP can’t reprice it later.
  • Most-Favored Customer Clauses (if achievable): It’s tough to get. Still, some very large customers negotiate clauses that if SAP offers a higher discount to another similar customer or a particular public program arises, they can benefit from it. SAP often resists this, but asking signals you are keen on fairness.
• Multi-Year Commitments and Strategic Partnerships: SAP often incentivizes customers to commit to multi-year deals – a multi-year cloud subscription or a multi-year license purchase program. In return, SAP may grant a bigger discount or include extra goodies (like additional training credits, enhanced support, or temporary free modules). For example, signing a 5-year cloud agreement for SuccessFactors might yield a better per-user price than a 1-year renewable term. From SAP’s perspective, longer commitment secures revenue; from your perspective, it locks in pricing. Use this to your advantage by negotiating price and terms flexibility in a multi-year deal. If you agree to a 5-year term, you might ask for the right to swap certain licenses for others as your needs evolve (known as license exchange rights) or perhaps a one-time reduction option if your business shrinks (some contracts allow a decrease in users at renewal within a band).
  Additionally, being a “strategic” customer for SAP (which a multi-year sizable commitment can confer) might give you access to executive-level attention, which can be helpful if issues arise. The trade-off with multi-year is less ability to change course if you find better solutions or if your usage drops. Therefore, only commit to multi-year on products you are confident you will use long-term. Ensure the contract has termination clauses or escape hatches in case, for instance, SAP fails to deliver certain service levels or product capabilities.
• Engage in Give-and-Take Negotiation: Don’t hesitate to ask SAP for additional discounts or value-adds, but be prepared to give something in return that matters to them. This could be agreeing to serve as a reference account or press release, which SAP’s sales teams highly value. Or perhaps accelerating the signature to hit a quarter-end deadline (if you truly are ready) in exchange for an extra few points off. Another tactic is consolidating all SAP business (e.g., if you have some projects considering non-SAP solutions, agree to go with SAP in those if they meet a price target). This kind of holistic negotiation can improve the outcome. Always remember: what is low cost to you but high value to SAP? An offering that can unlock better pricing.

Negotiation Preparation, TCO Modeling, and License Optimization

Achieving a great deal with SAP isn’t just about haggling at the last minute – it requires thorough preparation and ongoing management.

CIOs and procurement leaders should approach SAP negotiations as a continuous optimization and relationship management process. Here’s how:

• Baseline Your Needs and Usage: Conduct an internal assessment of your current SAP licenses and actual usage before entering any negotiation. This includes on-premise license counts (and how many are in use) and cloud subscriptions (and current user counts or consumption levels). Identify any shelfware or under-utilized licenses – these are leverage points (e.g., you might threaten to drop maintenance on unused licenses in exchange for a better deal on something new or plan to reallocate them). Also, forecast your future needs: How many users or what volume will you need in 1 year or 3 years? Which new SAP modules or products are you considering? A clear picture of needs prevents overbuying and provides a credible story to SAP about why you’re asking for certain quantities and discounts.
• Understand SAP’s Position: Research SAP’s current strategic priorities. For instance, if SAP pushes RISE with SAP or a particular cloud product this year, they might give extra incentives. Conversely, you may not get as much flexibility if a product is a legacy or not a focus. Public earnings reports, SAP’s press releases, and independent analyst reports can give clues. Also, if possible, get insights on typical discount ranges – sometimes peer benchmarks (through networking or consultants) can inform you what discount percentage is realistic to aim for, so you don’t settle for less than the market norm.
• Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Modeling: During negotiations, come prepared with a 5-year (or 10-year) TCO model for each option you’re considering. For example, if you decide between staying on-premise vs. moving to RISE, have a detailed breakdown of costs for each path. This should include software license or subscription fees, hardware or cloud infrastructure costs, implementation and integration costs, support/maintenance fees, personnel costs to run the systems, and potential costs like energy (for a data center) or downtime risk. By laying this out, you can identify which elements drive cost and where negotiating can yield savings. Share a high-level version with SAP to justify your ask: if your model shows that over 5 years, the proposed pricing would make SAP 30% more expensive than a competitor or status quo, show that gap. It gives SAP’s team concrete reasoning to justify a discount to their approvals committees (“The customer has an ROI issue; we need to come in at X price to win”). TCO models also help you avoid getting blindsided by costs that aren’t in the quote (like increases in year 4 or necessary add-ons).
• License Optimization and Management: Negotiation doesn’t end at contract signature. To truly maximize value, implement ongoing license management practices. Assign someone or a team to regularly review SAP usage. For on-premises, run SAP’s License Audit Workbench or other tools periodically to see if users are allocated the right license types. You may find, for instance, that 100 users with professional licenses never do anything beyond read reports. Those could be downgraded to a cheaper license type if you have that flexibility, or at least it informs how you will purchase in the future. For cloud products, monitor active users – if adoption is lower than expected, consider that in renewal negotiations (“we bought 1000 seats but only 700 used; we need a price adjustment or flexibility to drop 300”). Also, monitor indirect usage; ensure integrations are accounted for in your licensing to avoid compliance issues.
• Negotiation Tactics and Execution: When it’s time to negotiate with SAP, come in with a unified front (IT, procurement, and finance are all aligned on goals and walk-away points). Start the conversations early – large SAP deals can take months of back-and-forth. By starting 6-12 months before a renewal or project go-live need, you have time to create competition, iterate on proposals, and escalate if needed. Be willing to engage SAP at multiple levels: work with the account executive on pricing and involve SAP executive sponsors for strategic relationships and SAP contract/legal teams to get terms right. Always document every promise and ensure it makes it into the contract. Verbal assurances (e.g., “We’ll give you more users at the same price next year”) mean nothing if not written. Use a checklist of key negotiation points (pricing, renewal terms, uplifts, service levels, support terms, etc.) and tick them off as you reach an agreement.
• Consider External Expertise: If your SAP estate is very large or complex, using third-party experts or advisors (such as SAP licensing consultants or negotiation specialists) can pay off. They often have up-to-date information on SAP’s discounting trends and can pinpoint weaknesses in proposals. They can also run license optimization analyses to find hidden savings. While this comes at a cost, the return can be high for multimillion-dollar contracts.
• Maintain Flexibility for Future Changes: Try to build in clauses that give you flexibility. For instance, the right to swap license types (upgrade or downgrade user types as needs change), the right to transfer cloud subscriptions to successor products if SAP rebrands or replaces offerings, and clarity on how mergers, divestitures, or reorganizations affect licensing (so you don’t pay double in those events). These considerations ensure that your SAP contract can adapt as your business changes without incurring huge new costs.

By diligently preparing, modeling scenarios, and continuously managing your SAP assets, you turn what is often a daunting negotiation into a well-informed business discussion. This saves money and establishes a more balanced long-term relationship with SAP, where you, as the customer, retain leverage and control over your IT strategy rather than feeling locked in or surprised by costs.

Conclusion

SAP’s pricing and licensing might seem like a maze, but with the right approach, CIOs and procurement leaders can navigate it successfully.

The key takeaways are: educate yourself on how each SAP product is priced and measured, anticipate the hidden costs that can accrue over time, and negotiate proactively and holistically, not just on price but on the entire contract structure and future terms.

Always remember that in SAP deals, everything is negotiable if you have the knowledge and leverage, from the discount percentages to the annual increase, from license bundle composition to future flexibility provisions.

By applying the outlined tactics—bundling volumes smartly, timing your deals, using competition, insisting on price protections, and thoroughly preparing—you can achieve substantial savings and avoid common traps.

Ultimately, the goal is to strike a deal where your enterprise gets the needed SAP capabilities at a fair cost, with predictable spending and the agility to adjust as business needs evolve.

With SAP being a critical backbone for operations, getting the commercial side right is as important as getting the technology right. Armed with these insights, CIOs and procurement leaders can confidently approach SAP negotiations and secure agreements that deliver value not just on day one but throughout the partnership’s lifecycle.